Climate policy as social policy? A comprehensive assessment of the economic impact of climate action in the UK

被引:0
|
作者
Sudmant, Andrew [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Boyle, Dom [4 ]
Higgins-Lavery, Ruaidhri [1 ]
Gouldson, Andy [2 ]
Boyle, Andy [3 ]
Fulker, James [4 ]
Brogan, Jamie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Edinburgh Climate Change Inst, Edinburgh EH1 1LZ, Scotland
[2] Univ Leeds, Sustainabil Res Inst, Fac Environm, Leeds, England
[3] Your Climate Strategy, 3 Whiteley Croft Gardens, Otley LS21 3PF, England
[4] Price Waterhouse Coopers, 1 Embankment Pl, London WC2N 6RH, England
关键词
Climate change; Co-benefits; Urban climate action; Sixth Carbon Budget; MITIGATION;
D O I
10.1007/s13412-024-00955-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Co-benefits are central to the case for climate action but are side-lined in many economic analyses. This paper presents an evaluation of three dimensions of the costs and benefits of climate change interventions in six urban regions of the UK. Findings indicate that meeting the UK's 2033-2037 climate targets could yield 164 pound billion in total benefits. Notably, only 13% of these benefits are financial, in contrast to the 79% of which are social benefits. These social benefits include improvements in public health, reduced traffic congestion, and increased thermal comfort in homes. These results underscore the need for economic evaluations to expand their scope and move beyond the narrow financial cost-benefit analysis that predominates. Moreover, the magnitude of the social benefits underscores the need for integrating social and climate challenges in policymaking. Concurrently, the results demonstrate the sensitivity of the social benefits of climate actions to the normative aspects of empirical analysis. Determining whether emissions reductions in the transport sector, for example, should be achieved through the deployment of electric cars, expansion of public transport, and/or increases in walking and cycling requires both technical analysis and value-based decision making. Ensuring that decision-making processes are deliberate and transparent in empirical analysis is therefore critical. We conclude by suggesting that institutions such as the UK Climate Change Committee and Scottish Climate Intelligence Service should take the opportunity to be more explicit in the normative decisions embedded in their empirical work to demonstrate best practice for the wider research community.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Combining climate, economic, and social policy builds public support for climate action in the US
    Bergquist, Parrish
    Mildenberger, Matto
    Stokes, Leah C.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 15 (05)
  • [2] A comprehensive socio-economic assessment of EU climate policy pathways
    Weitzel, Matthias
    Vandyck, Toon
    Santos, Luis Rey Los
    Tamba, Marie
    Temursho, Umed
    Wojtowicz, Krzysztof
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2023, 204
  • [3] EU climate policy up to 2020: An economic impact assessment
    Boehringer, Christoph
    Loeschel, Andreas
    Moslener, Ulf
    Rutherford, Thomas F.
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2009, 31 : S295 - S305
  • [4] Assessment of the Climate Impact on the Economic Variables of Monetary Policy: Regional Approach
    Arzhenovskiya, S. V.
    Sinyavskayab, T. G.
    Nikoghosyanb, V. M.
    REGIONOLOGIYA-REGIONOLOGY RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF REGIONAL STUDIES, 2023, 31 (01): : 70 - 86
  • [5] Pledges, politics and performance: an assessment of UK climate policy
    Darkin, Beverley
    CLIMATE POLICY, 2006, 6 (03) : 257 - 274
  • [6] Policy transfer in the development of UK climate policy
    Smith, A
    POLICY AND POLITICS, 2004, 32 (01): : 79 - 93
  • [7] The Impact of Climate Change: Social Policy Initiatives
    Acharyulu, A.
    GLOBAL SOCIAL POLICY, 2010, 10 (01) : 21 - 23
  • [8] Climate policy planning and development impact assessment
    Scrieciu, S. Serban
    Chalabi, Zaid
    MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2014, 19 (03) : 255 - 260
  • [9] Climate policy planning and development impact assessment
    S. Şerban Scrieciu
    Zaid Chalabi
    Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2014, 19 : 255 - 260
  • [10] Climate Change, Climate Policy, and Economic Growth
    Stock, James H.
    NBER MACROECONOMICS ANNUAL, 2020, 34 (01) : 399 - 419