Endoscope channel drying, storage, and conditions after reprocessing: How safe are they in clinical practice?

被引:0
|
作者
Garcia, N. B. [1 ]
Oliveira, A. C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Escuela Enfermeria, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
来源
关键词
Gastrointestinal endoscopes; Equipment contamination; Storage; BIOFILM ACCUMULATION; CONTAMINATION; DISINFECTION; COLONOSCOPES; GUIDELINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.rgmx.2023.06.006
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction and aims: Adequate drying and proper storage of flexible endoscopes are essential for maintaining quality in their reprocessing. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the drying stages, storage, and channel conditions of endoscopes through borescope inspection. Material and methods: The personnel responsible for endoscope reprocessing were interviewed. Storage conditions at 10 endoscopy facilities were inspected and an internal examination of the channels and ports of the stored equipment was carried out, utilizing a borescope. A total of 74 stored endoscope channels were evaluated. Results: Only 10% of the facilities inspected utilized transport cases for storage and only 10% had rooms exclusively used for storage. Sixty percent of the facilities did not perform any shelf-life control. All the channels evaluated were scratched and fluids were present on 69% of them. Conclusions: Endoscope reprocessing can be improved through the implementation of drying and storage control and validation tools, as well as the use of borescopes and periodic clinical audits. (c) 2024 Asociacion Mexicana de Gastroenterolog & imath;a. Published by Masson Doyma Mexico S.A. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:332 / 339
页数:8
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Clinical Practice Guidelines for Endoscope Reprocessing
    Oh, Hyun Jin
    Kim, Jin Su
    [J]. CLINICAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 48 (05) : 364 - 368
  • [2] Endoscope reprocessing: How to perform an adequate air drying?
    Beilenhoff, Ulrike
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2023, 11 (04) : E440 - E442
  • [3] Comparison of automated and manual drying in the elimination of residual endoscope working channel fluid after reprocessing
    Barakat, Monique T.
    Huang, Robert J.
    Banerjee, Subhas
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 89 (01) : 124 - +
  • [4] Are current endoscope reprocessing procedures effective in clinical practice?
    Moses, FM
    Lee, J
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 51 (04) : AB60 - AB60
  • [5] Endoscope reprocessing: Comparison of drying effectiveness and microbial levels with an automated drying and storage cabinet with forced filtered air and a standard storage cabinet
    Perumpail, Ryan B.
    Marya, Neil B.
    McGinty, Betty L.
    Muthusamy, V. Raman
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2019, 47 (09) : 1083 - 1089
  • [6] Endoscope storage time: assessment of microbial colonization up to 21 days after reprocessing
    Brock, Andrew S.
    Steed, Lisa L.
    Freeman, Janice
    Garry, Bernadette
    Malpas, Phyllis
    Cotton, Peter
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 81 (05) : 1150 - 1154
  • [8] How safe is the use of thiazolidinediones in clinical practice?
    Rizos, C. V.
    Elisaf, M. S.
    Mikhailidis, D. P.
    Liberopoulos, E. N.
    [J]. EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY, 2009, 8 (01) : 15 - 32
  • [9] Evaluation of efficacy of an endoscope storage and drying chamber in an endoscopy unit and its impact on working practice
    Thomas, S.
    Watts, S.
    Saum, E.
    Chilton, A. P.
    [J]. GUT, 2007, 56 : A85 - A85
  • [10] A novel polytetrafluoroethylene-channel model, which simulates low levels of culturable bacteria in buildup biofilm after repeated endoscope reprocessing
    Alfa, Michelle J.
    Ribeiro, Maira M.
    Luciano, Cristiana da Costa
    Franca, Rodrigo
    Olson, Nancy
    DeGagne, Pat
    Singh, Harminder
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 86 (03) : 442 - U350