Carbon Cycle Response to Stratospheric Aerosol Injection With Multiple Temperature Stabilization Targets and Strategies

被引:0
|
作者
Zhao, Mengying [1 ]
Cao, Long [1 ]
Visioni, Daniele [2 ]
MacMartin, Douglas G. [3 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Earth Sci, Dept Atmospher Sci, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Cornell Univ, Dept Earth & Atmospher Sci, Ithaca, NY USA
[3] Cornell Univ, Sibley Sch Mech & Aerosp Engn, Ithaca, NY USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
RADIATION MANAGEMENT; PERMAFROST; OCEAN; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1029/2024EF004474
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
We analyze the global carbon cycle response to a set of stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) simulations performed by the CESM2(WACCM6-MA) model. The simulations are performed under the specified SSP2-4.5 CO2 concentration pathway. It is found that both the temperature stabilization target and the SO2 injection strategy have important effects on the global carbon sink. Relative to the SSP2-4.5 scenario, averaged over the last 20 years of our simulations (year 2050-2069), simultaneous multi-location SO2 injection causes an increase in cumulative land carbon uptake of 45 and 23 PgC, and an increase in cumulative ocean carbon uptake of 6 and 2 PgC for temperature stabilization targets of 0.5 degrees C and 1.5 degrees C respectively. For a temperature stabilization target of 1.0 degrees C, SO2 injections increase land and ocean carbon sinks by 22-42 PgC and 4-7 PgC, respectively, depending on the strategies of SO2 injections (low latitude, mid-to-high latitude, and multi-objective injection). Relative to SSP2-4.5, by year 2069, SAI increases diagnosed cumulative CO2 emissions by 25-53 PgC (3%-6%), implying a decrease in atmospheric CO2 if SO2 injections were performed under a prescribed CO2 emission pathway. Stratospheric SO2 injections slow permafrost thaw, but do not restore permafrost to the previous extent at the same warming level for all injection strategies. An abrupt termination of SO2 injection weakens both the ocean and land carbon sink, and causes a rapid decline of permafrost extent. A gradual phaseout of SO2 injection slows sharp decline of permafrost and delays the rebound of carbon sink. Plain Language Summary Stratospheric SO2 injections are proposed as a possible additional tool to help counteract global warming. This method would affect aspects of the climate system such as temperature, precipitation, and ocean circulation, which would in turn alter the global carbon cycle. We use an Earth system model to examine how SO2 injections would affect the ability of land and ocean to absorb CO2. Under a moderate CO2 concentration increase scenario (SSP2-4.5), SO2 is injected into the stratosphere to maintain global temperature at the level of 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 degrees C above pre-industrial, respectively. Compared to the background scenario, SO2 injections increase the land and ocean CO2 sinks and reduce atmospheric CO2 (diagnosed here as 3%-6% increase in cumulative CO2 emissions that would lead to specific CO2 concentration). For the same 1 degrees C target, the location of SO2 injections (low-latitudes, high-latitudes, multilatitudes) could produce a range of response in land and ocean CO2 sinks that is as large as that caused by different cooling targets. Both land and ocean CO2 sinks are weakened in response to an abrupt or gradual termination of SO2 injection. SO2 injections slow permafrost thaw but do not entirely restore permafrost to past extents at the same warming level.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Hemispherically symmetric strategies for stratospheric aerosol injection
    Zhang, Yan
    Macmartin, Douglas G.
    Visioni, Daniele
    Bednarz, Ewa M.
    Kravitz, Ben
    [J]. EARTH SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 2024, 15 (02) : 191 - 213
  • [2] Seasonal Injection Strategies for Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering
    Visioni, Daniele
    MacMartin, Douglas G.
    Kravitz, Ben
    Tilmes, Simone
    Mills, Michael J.
    Richter, Jadwiga H.
    Boudreau, Matthew P.
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2019, 46 (13) : 7790 - 7799
  • [3] Carbon Emissions, Stratospheric Aerosol Injection, and Unintended Harms
    Preston, Christopher J.
    [J]. ETHICS & INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, 2017, 31 (04) : 479 - 493
  • [4] The Climate Response to Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering Can Be Tailored Using Multiple Injection Locations
    MacMartin, Douglas G.
    Kravitz, Ben
    Tilmes, Simone
    Richter, Jadwiga H.
    Mills, Michael J.
    Lamarque, Jean-Francois
    Tribbia, Joseph J.
    Vitt, Francis
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2017, 122 (23) : 12574 - 12590
  • [5] Climate response to aerosol injection at different stratospheric locations
    Volodin, Eugeny M.
    Kostrykin, Sergey V.
    Ryaboshapko, Alexey G.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCE LETTERS, 2011, 12 (04): : 381 - 385
  • [6] Global monsoon response to tropical and Arctic stratospheric aerosol injection
    Weiyi Sun
    Bin Wang
    Deliang Chen
    Chaochao Gao
    Guonian Lu
    Jian Liu
    [J]. Climate Dynamics, 2020, 55 : 2107 - 2121
  • [7] Global monsoon response to tropical and Arctic stratospheric aerosol injection
    Sun, Weiyi
    Wang, Bin
    Chen, Deliang
    Gao, Chaochao
    Lu, Guonian
    Liu, Jian
    [J]. CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2020, 55 (7-8) : 2107 - 2121
  • [8] Greenland Ice Sheet Response to Stratospheric Aerosol Injection Geoengineering
    Moore, John C.
    Yue, Chao
    Zhao, Liyun
    Guo, Xiaoran
    Watanabe, Shingo
    Ji, Duoying
    [J]. EARTHS FUTURE, 2019, 7 (12) : 1451 - 1463
  • [9] Assessing the consequences of including aerosol absorption in potential stratospheric aerosol injection climate intervention strategies
    Haywood, Jim M.
    Jones, Andy
    Johnson, Ben T.
    Smith, William McFarlane
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2022, 22 (09) : 6135 - 6150
  • [10] Sensitivity of stratospheric geoengineering with black carbon to aerosol size and altitude of injection
    Kravitz, Ben
    Robock, Alan
    Shindell, Drew T.
    Miller, Mark A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2012, 117