Bioinformatics and machine learning to support nanomaterial grouping

被引:1
|
作者
Bahl, Aileen [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Halappanavar, Sabina [4 ]
Wohlleben, Wendel [5 ,6 ]
Nymark, Penny [7 ]
Kohonen, Pekka [7 ]
Wallin, Hakan [8 ,9 ]
Vogel, Ulla [10 ]
Haase, Andrea [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] German Fed Inst Risk Assessment BfR, Dept Chem & Prod Safety, Berlin, Germany
[2] German Fed Inst Risk Assessment BfR, Dept Biol Safety, Berlin, Germany
[3] Free Univ Berlin, Inst Pharm, Berlin, Germany
[4] Hlth Canada, Environm Hlth Sci & Res Bur, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[5] BASF SE, Dept Analyt & Mat Sci, Ludwigshafen, Germany
[6] BASF SE, Dept Expt Toxicol & Ecol, Ludwigshafen, Germany
[7] Karolinska Inst, Inst Environm Med, Stockholm, Sweden
[8] Natl Inst Occupat Hlth, Dept Chem & Biol Risk Factors, Oslo, Norway
[9] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Publ Hlth, Copenhagen, Denmark
[10] Natl Res Ctr Working Environm, Copenhagen, Denmark
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Nanomaterial grouping; machine learning; omics; artificial intelligence; new approach methodologies; ENHANCED MR CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; MANGANESE NEUROTOXICITY; GADOLINIUM TOXICITY; CONTRAST AGENT; SILVER NANOPARTICLES; CEREBROSPINAL-FLUID; BRAIN METASTASES; NEPHROTOXICITY; DISEASE; MNDPDP;
D O I
10.1080/17435390.2024.2368005
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ;
摘要
Nanomaterials (NMs) offer plenty of novel functionalities. Moreover, their physicochemical properties can be fine-tuned to meet the needs of specific applications, leading to virtually unlimited numbers of NM variants. Hence, efficient hazard and risk assessment strategies building on New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) become indispensable. Indeed, the design, the development and implementation of NAMs has been a major topic in a substantial number of research projects. One of the promising strategies that can help to deal with the high number of NMs variants is grouping and read-across. Based on demonstrated structural and physicochemical similarity, NMs can be grouped and assessed together. Within an established NM group, read-across may be performed to fill in data gaps for data-poor variants using existing data for NMs within the group. Establishing a group requires a sound justification, usually based on a grouping hypothesis that links specific physicochemical properties to well-defined hazard endpoints. However, for NMs these interrelationships are only beginning to be understood. The aim of this review is to demonstrate the power of bioinformatics with a specific focus on Machine Learning (ML) approaches to unravel the NM Modes-of-Action (MoA) and identify the properties that are relevant to specific hazards, in support of grouping strategies. This review emphasizes the following messages: 1) ML supports identification of the most relevant properties contributing to specific hazards; 2) ML supports analysis of large omics datasets and identification of MoA patterns in support of hypothesis formulation in grouping approaches; 3) omics approaches are useful for shifting away from consideration of single endpoints towards a more mechanistic understanding across multiple endpoints gained from one experiment; and 4) approaches from other fields of Artificial Intelligence (AI) like Natural Language Processing or image analysis may support automated extraction and interlinkage of information related to NM toxicity. Here, existing ML models for predicting NM toxicity and for analyzing omics data in support of NM grouping are reviewed. Various challenges related to building robust models in the field of nanotoxicology exist and are also discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 400
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Systems Biology to Support Nanomaterial Grouping
    Riebeling, Christian
    Jungnickel, Harald
    Luch, Andreas
    Haase, Andrea
    MODELLING THE TOXICITY OF NANOPARTICLES, 2017, 947 : 143 - 171
  • [2] Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
    Ramon, Jan
    Costa, Fabrizio
    Florencio, Christophe Costa
    Kok, Joost
    FUNDAMENTA INFORMATICAE, 2011, 113 (02) : I - II
  • [3] Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
    Zhaoli
    2011 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND NETWORK TECHNOLOGY (ICCSNT), VOLS 1-4, 2012, : 582 - 584
  • [4] Machine learning in bioinformatics
    Larranaga, Pedro
    Calvo, Borja
    Santana, Roberto
    Bielza, Concha
    Galdiano, Josu
    Inza, Inaki
    Lozano, Jose A.
    Armananzas, Ruben
    Santafe, Guzman
    Perez, Aritz
    Robles, Victor
    BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS, 2006, 7 (01) : 86 - 112
  • [5] Machine learning for bioinformatics and neuroimaging
    Serra, Angela
    Galdi, Paola
    Tagliaferri, Roberto
    WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-DATA MINING AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY, 2018, 8 (05)
  • [6] Machine Learning for Nanomaterial Toxicity Risk Assessment
    Gernand, Jeremy M.
    Casman, Elizabeth A.
    IEEE INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2014, 29 (03) : 84 - 88
  • [7] Application of Machine Learning Methods in Bioinformatics
    Yang, Haoyu
    An, Zheng
    Zhou, Haotian
    Hou, Yawen
    6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN, MANUFACTURING, MODELING AND SIMULATION (CDMMS 2018), 2018, 1967
  • [8] Machine Learning Models in Protein Bioinformatics
    Kurgan, Lukasz
    Zhou, Yaoqi
    CURRENT PROTEIN & PEPTIDE SCIENCE, 2011, 12 (06) : 455 - 455
  • [9] APPLICATION OF MACHINE LEARNING METHODS IN BIOINFORMATICS
    Wu, S. F.
    BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2016, 118 : 35 - 35
  • [10] Interpretable machine learning in bioinformatics Introduction
    Cho, Young-Rae
    Kang, Mingon
    METHODS, 2020, 179 : 1 - 2