The management of project management: A conceptual framework for project governance

被引:192
|
作者
Too, Eric G. [1 ]
Weaver, Patrick [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Queensland, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia
关键词
Project governance; Multi project environment; Strategic alignment; Enterprise project management; Business value; PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE; STRATEGY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.07.006
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
For an organization to create optimal value from its investment in projects there must be a clear link between the outputs created by the projects and the requirements of the organization's business strategy. This means that organizations that have a structure in place for aligning the project deliverables with their organizational goals will be better placed to realize their investment in projects, and achieve the value defined by their business strategies. This paper examines existing research, ideas and concepts of project governance and enterprise project management, and offers a framework to build on current theory development and practice. Synthesizing existing literature of project/program management, governance and portfolio management, this paper proposes four key elements to improve the performance of projects and hence create value for organizations. These four elements are (1) portfolio management: focused on selecting the right projects and programs to support the organization's strategy, and terminating ones that no longer contribute to the business success of the organization; (2) project sponsorship: providing the direct link between the executive and the project or program manager, focused on the whole project lifecycle; (3) Project Management Office (PMO): providing oversight and strategic reporting capabilities; (4) projects and program support: the effective support and management of projects and programs are the measures of an effective governance system. The purpose of the framework described in this paper is to provide guidance to organizations in the development of effective project governance to optimize the management of projects. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. APM and IPMA. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1382 / 1394
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] NATIONAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT MATURITY: A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
    Seelhofer, D.
    Graf, C. O.
    [J]. CENTRAL EUROPEAN BUSINESS REVIEW, 2018, 7 (02) : 1 - 20
  • [2] A POSSIBLE CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR AN INTELLIGENT PROJECT MANAGEMENT
    Balauscu, Reizvan
    Chitiga, Georgiana
    Dragoi, Catalin
    [J]. CRISES AFTER THE CRISIS: INQUIRIES FROM A NATIONAL, EUROPEAN AND GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE, VOL II, 2011, : 20 - 22
  • [3] Conceptual Framework of Construction Project Management Major Activities
    Kamal, M. F. Mustaffa
    Hassan, F.
    Ismail, Z.
    Affandi, H. Mohd
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY, MANAGEMENT AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2013, 15 : 165 - 170
  • [4] A Conceptual Information Technology Project Management Assurance Framework
    Mkoba, Elizabeth
    Marnewick, Carl
    [J]. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2020, 12 (01): : 44 - 75
  • [5] A Conceptual Framework for Applying Artificial Intelligence in Project Management
    Auth, Gunnar
    Joehnk, Jan
    Wiecha, Dennis A.
    [J]. 2021 IEEE 23RD CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS INFORMATICS, CBI 2021, VOL 1, 2021, : 161 - 170
  • [6] Project management for social good A conceptual framework and research agenda for socially sustainable construction project management
    Goel, Ashish
    Ganesh, L. S.
    Kaur, Arshinder
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGING PROJECTS IN BUSINESS, 2020, 13 (04) : 695 - 726
  • [7] The impact of project management (PM) and benefits management (BM) practices on project success: Towards developing a project benefits governance framework
    Badewi, Amgad
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2016, 34 (04) : 761 - 778
  • [9] A framework for project management
    Curtis, M
    [J]. SOFTWARE QUALITY MANAGEMENT IV - IMPROVING QUALITY, 1996, : 199 - 209
  • [10] A framework for project management
    Curtis, M
    [J]. SOFTWARE QUALITY JOURNAL, 1996, 5 (02) : 97 - 105