Wearable Sensors for Athletic Performance: A Comparison of Discrete and Continuous Feature-Extraction Methods for Prediction Models

被引:0
|
作者
White, Mark [1 ]
De Lazzari, Beatrice [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Bezodis, Neil [1 ]
Camomilla, Valentina [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Swansea Univ, Fac Sci & Engn, Appl Sports Technol Exercise & Med A STEM Res Ctr, Swansea SA2 8PP, Wales
[2] Univ Rome Foro Italico, Dept Movement Human & Hlth Sci, I-00135 Rome, Italy
[3] GoSport S r l, Via Basento, I-00198 Rome, Italy
[4] Univ Rome Foro Ital, Interuniv Ctr Bioengn Human Neuromusculoskeletal S, Rome, Italy
关键词
accelerometer; countermovement jump; feature extraction; functional principal component analysis; inertial measurement units; jump power; signal alignment; smartphone; sport; wearables; FUNCTIONAL DATA-ANALYSIS; SELECTION; JUMP; KINEMATICS; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.3390/math12121853
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Wearable sensors have become increasingly popular for assessing athletic performance, but the optimal methods for processing and analyzing the data remain unclear. This study investigates the efficacy of discrete and continuous feature-extraction methods, separately and in combination, for modeling countermovement jump performance using wearable sensor data. We demonstrate that continuous features, particularly those derived from Functional Principal Component Analysis, outperform discrete features in terms of model performance, robustness to variations in data distribution and volume, and consistency across different datasets. Our findings underscore the importance of methodological choices, such as signal type, alignment methods, and model selection, in developing accurate and generalizable predictive models. We also highlight the potential pitfalls of relying solely on domain knowledge for feature selection and the benefits of data-driven approaches. Furthermore, we discuss the implications of our findings for the broader field of sports biomechanics and provide practical recommendations for researchers and practitioners aiming to leverage wearable sensor data for athletic performance assessment. Our results contribute to the development of more reliable and widely applicable predictive models, facilitating the use of wearable technology for optimizing training and enhancing athletic outcomes across various sports disciplines.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Singular-Value Decomposition Feature-Extraction Method for Cost-Performance Prediction
    He, Shiyuan
    Du, Jing
    Huang, Jianhua Z.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTING IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2017, 31 (05)
  • [2] Comparison of Feature Learning Methods for Human Activity Recognition Using Wearable Sensors
    Li, Frederic
    Shirahama, Kimiaki
    Nisar, Muhammad Adeel
    Koeping, Lukas
    Grzegorzek, Marcin
    SENSORS, 2018, 18 (02)
  • [3] A Performance Comparison of Feature Extraction Methods for Sentiment Analysis
    Hung, Lai Po
    Alfred, Rayner
    ADVANCED TOPICS IN INTELLIGENT INFORMATION AND DATABASE SYSTEMS, 2017, 710 : 379 - 390
  • [4] Human Activity Recognition: A Comparative Study of Validation Methods and Impact of Feature Extraction in Wearable Sensors
    Rehman, Saeed Ur
    Ali, Anwar
    Khan, Adil Mehmood
    Okpala, Cynthia
    Algorithms, 2024, 17 (12)
  • [5] Comparison of feature learning methods for non-invasive interstitial glucose prediction using wearable sensors in healthy cohorts: a pilot study
    Huang, Xinyu
    Schmelter, Franziska
    Uhlig, Annemarie
    Irshad, Muhammad Tausif
    Nisar, Muhammad Adeel
    Piet, Artur
    Jablonski, Lennart
    Witt, Oliver
    Schroeder, Torsten
    Sina, Christian
    Grzegorzek, Marcin
    INTELLIGENT MEDICINE, 2024, 4 (04): : 226 - 238
  • [6] Performance Comparison of Feature Selection Methods for Prediction in Medical Data
    Khalid, Nur Hidayah Mohd
    Ismail, Amelia Ritahani
    Aziz, Normaziah Abdul
    Hussin, Amir Aatieff Amir
    SOFT COMPUTING IN DATA SCIENCE, SCDS 2023, 2023, 1771 : 92 - 106
  • [7] Comparative analysis of feature selection and extraction methods for student performance prediction across different machine learning models
    Laakel Hemdanou, Abderrafik
    Lamarti Sefian, Mohammed
    Achtoun, Youssef
    Tahiri, Ismail
    Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2024, 7
  • [8] Performance comparison of feature selection and extraction methods with random instance selection
    Malekipirbazari, Milad
    Aksakalli, Vural
    Shafqat, Waleed
    Eberhard, Andrew
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2021, 179
  • [9] Performance comparison of feature selection and extraction methods with random instance selection
    Malekipirbazari, Milad
    Aksakalli, Vural
    Shafqat, Waleed
    Eberhard, Andrew
    Expert Systems with Applications, 2021, 179
  • [10] Liking Prediction Using fNIRS and Machine Learning: Comparison of Feature Extraction Methods
    Koksal, Mehmet Yigit
    Cakar, Tuna
    Tuna, Esin
    Girisken, Yener
    2022 30TH SIGNAL PROCESSING AND COMMUNICATIONS APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE, SIU, 2022,