Efficacy of the posterior nasal nerve resection combined with hormone transnasal nebulization on difficult-to-treat rhinosinusitis: a retrospective analysis

被引：1

作者：

Wang, Xin-ke ^{[1
]}

Zheng, Qi-ling ^{[2
]}

Sun, Jia-ning ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Third Hosp Ninghai Cty, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Ningbo, Peoples R China

[2] Yuyao Peoples Hosp Zhejiang Prov, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Yuyao, Peoples R China

来源：

BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY | 2024年 / 90卷 / 04期

关键词：

Posterior nasal nerve (PNN) resection; Budesonide suspension; Transnasal nebulization; Difficult-to-treat rhinosinusitis (DTRS); ADULT CHRONIC RHINOSINUSITIS; ENDOSCOPIC SINUS; ALLERGIC RHINITIS;

D O I：

10.1016/j.bjorl.2024.101413

中图分类号：

R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];

学科分类号：

100213 ;

摘要：

Objective: A retrospective analysis was performed to explore the clinical effect of the Posterior Nasal Nerve (PNN) resection combined with hormone transnasal nebulization on Difficult -toTreat Rhinosinusitis (DTRS). Methods: A total of 120 DTRS patients were selected and divided into a control group ( n = 60) and a study group ( n = 60) according to different treatments. The control group patients were treated via PNN resection, followed by normal saline transnasal nebulization; the study group patients were given PNN resection and then treated with budesonide suspension transnasal nebulization. Subsequently, the comparison was performed between the two groups in terms of (1) Clinical baseline characteristics; (2) Sino-nasal Outcome Test (SNOT) -22 scores before treatment and after 3 -months, 6 -months and 12 -months of treatment; (3) Lund -MacKay scores before treatment and after 10, 30, 90, and 180 days of treatment; (4) Incidence of adverse reactions during treatment. Results: There was no significant difference in SNOT -22 or Lund -Kennedy scores between the two groups before treatment ( p > 0.05). After treatment, the SNOT -22 and Lund -Kennedy scores of the control and the study groups were decreased, and compared with the control group, the SNOT -22 and Lund -Kennedy scores in the study group improved more significantly ( p < 0.05). In addition, the study group and the control group presented with 1 and 4 cases of nasal adhesion, 2 and 3 cases of epistaxis, 1 and 4 cases of sinus orifice obstruction, 1 and 3 cases of lacrimal duct injuries, respectively. The incidence of adverse reactions in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group (8.3% vs. 23.3%) ( p < 0.05). Conclusion: PNN resection combined with hormone transnasal nebulization treatment can improve the symptoms and quality of life of DTRS patients, with good clinical efficacy but few adverse reactions. Therefore, such combination treatment deserves a promotion and application clinically. Level of Evidence: Level 3. (c) 2024 Associa & ccedil;ao Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cervico-Facial. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

引用

页数：8