Chinese is a discourse-configurational language: Miyagawa's typology revisited

被引:0
|
作者
Zhao, Chen [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Foreign Languages, Off 203,1037 Luoyu Rd, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
关键词
Discourse-configurational language; Feature inheritance; Object preposing; Embedded root phenomenon; MOVEMENT; ENGLISH;
D O I
10.1016/j.lingua.2024.103716
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Assuming the Strong Uniformity Principle, Miyagawa recently proposed a typology of languages based on distinct patterns of Feature Inheritance at Phase C. In this typology, Chinese is identified as a Category II language (with the 6-feature on C and the u-feature on T). That is, Chinese is regarded as a non-discourse-configurational language similar to English. This paper aims to review Miyagawa's discussion of Chinese and argue for its reclassification as a Category III language, that is, a discourse-configurational language like Spanish. I contend that Miyagawa's discussion of Chinese only pertains to Aboutness-shift topic, a type of topic base-generated in the CP domain across languages; as a result, his conclusions are unsustainable. On the other hand, I show that phenomena like Object Preposing, forced A-focalization, and the distribution of Familiar and Contrastive topics in non-assertive embedded clauses provide compelling evidence that the 6-feature has lowered to T in Chinese. Finally, I address a potential counterargument presented by the Chinese wh-adverbial zenme 'how come'. I argue that zenme is not base-generated in the CP periphery, but rather inserted in the TP layer. (c) 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:35
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Negative sensitive items and the discourse-configurational nature of Japanese
    Miyagawa, Shigeru
    Nishioka, Nobuaki
    Zeijlstra, Hedde
    GLOSSA-A JOURNAL OF GENERAL LINGUISTICS, 2016, 1 (01):
  • [2] Is German discourse-configurational? Experimental evidence for a topic position
    Stoerzer, Melanie
    Stolterfoht, Britta
    GLOSSA-A JOURNAL OF GENERAL LINGUISTICS, 2018, 3 (01):
  • [3] Navajo as a discourse configurational language
    Willie, M
    Jelinek, E
    ATHABASKAN LANGUAGES: PERSPECTIVES ON A NATIVE AMERICAN LANGUAGE FAMILY, 2000, 24 : 252 - 287
  • [4] Why agree? Why move? Unifying agreement-based and discourse-configurational languages
    Holmberg, Anders
    LANGUAGE, 2011, 87 (01) : 218 - 221
  • [5] STUDIES IN JAPANESE LANGUAGE USE - MIYAGAWA,S, KITAGAWA,C
    ROSS, C
    MODERN LANGUAGE JOURNAL, 1985, 69 (02): : 192 - 193
  • [6] Jellinek's typology revisited
    HillerSturmhofel, S
    ALCOHOL HEALTH & RESEARCH WORLD, 1996, 20 (01): : 16 - 17
  • [7] Jung's Typology Revisited
    Andrews, Valerie
    JUNG JOURNAL-CULTURE & PSYCHE, 2014, 8 (04) : 92 - 98
  • [8] THE TYPOLOGY OF DIDACTEMS AS UNITS OF FOREIGN LANGUAGE LINGUODIDACTICAL DISCOURSE
    Kopylova, Victoriya Viktorovna
    VESTNIK VOLGOGRADSKOGO GOSUDARSTVENNOGO UNIVERSITETA-SERIYA 2-YAZYKOZNANIE, 2014, 13 (01): : 84 - 92
  • [9] Towards a typology of discourse-based approaches to language attitudes
    Rodgers, Elena
    LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION, 2017, 56 : 82 - 94
  • [10] Current studies in Chinese language and discourse
    Zhao, Ruihua
    LANGUAGE IN SOCIETY, 2020, 49 (01) : 167 - 169