Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography-Derived Radiomic Models in Prostate Cancer Prognostication

被引:0
|
作者
Huynh, Linda My [1 ,2 ]
Swanson, Shea [1 ]
Cima, Sophia [1 ]
Haddadin, Eliana [2 ]
Baine, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Omaha, NE 68105 USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Urol, Irvine, CA 92868 USA
关键词
prostate cancer; radiomics; personalized medicine; artificial intelligence; FEATURES;
D O I
10.3390/cancers16101897
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Simple Summary The contemporary development of radiomics offers an opportune methodology for the interpretation of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). While both technologies are relatively new for consideration of clinical integration, the present exploration seeks to review current literature on their intersection. Review of twenty-three peer-reviewed articles revealed promising results for the use of PSMA PET/CT-derived radiomics in the prediction of biopsy Gleason score, adverse pathology, and treatment outcomes for prostate cancer (PC). Clinical integration of these findings, however, are limited by lack of biologic validation and reproducible methodology.Abstract The clinical integration of prostate membrane specific antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) scans represents potential for advanced data analysis techniques in prostate cancer (PC) prognostication. Among these tools is the use of radiomics, a computer-based method of extracting and quantitatively analyzing subvisual features in medical imaging. Within this context, the present review seeks to summarize the current literature on the use of PSMA PET/CT-derived radiomics in PC risk stratification. A stepwise literature search of publications from 2017 to 2023 was performed. Of 23 articles on PSMA PET/CT-derived prostate radiomics, PC diagnosis, prediction of biopsy Gleason score (GS), prediction of adverse pathology, and treatment outcomes were the primary endpoints of 4 (17.4%), 5 (21.7%), 7 (30.4%), and 7 (30.4%) studies, respectively. In predicting PC diagnosis, PSMA PET/CT-derived models performed well, with receiver operator characteristic curve area under the curve (ROC-AUC) values of 0.85-0.925. Similarly, in the prediction of biopsy and surgical pathology results, ROC-AUC values had ranges of 0.719-0.84 and 0.84-0.95, respectively. Finally, prediction of recurrence, progression, or survival following treatment was explored in nine studies, with ROC-AUC ranging 0.698-0.90. Of the 23 studies included in this review, 2 (8.7%) included external validation. While explorations of PSMA PET/CT-derived radiomic models are immature in follow-up and experience, these results represent great potential for future investigation and exploration. Prior to consideration for clinical use, however, rigorous validation in feature reproducibility and biologic validation of radiomic signatures must be prioritized.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Microcosting Study of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Prostate Cancer
    Parkinson, Bonny
    Sharma, Rajan
    Jeet, Varinder
    Song, Rachel
    Hoyle, Martin
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH REGIONAL ISSUES, 2022, 32 : 17 - 22
  • [2] Case - Prostate-specific antigen bounce: A pitfall in prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography interpretation
    Pedro, Victor Polins
    Sistani, Golmehr
    Rachinsky, Irina
    Zukotynski, Katherine
    Bauman, Glenn
    Liu, Wei
    [J]. CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2021, 15 (11): : E620 - E621
  • [3] Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Locally Advanced, Recurrent, and Metastatic Prostate Cancer
    Perera, Marlon
    Murphy, Declan
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    [J]. JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2018, 4 (05) : 748 - +
  • [4] Positron Emission Tomography-computed Tomography with Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Ligands as a Promising Tool for Imaging of Prostate Cancer
    Haberkorn, Uwe
    Kopka, Klaus
    Hadaschik, Boris
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (03) : 397 - 399
  • [5] Making the case for prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted positron emission tomography/computed tomography in suspected prostate cancer
    Singh, Harmandeep
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2020, 35 (04): : 281 - 282
  • [6] Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Locally Advanced, Recurrent, and Metastatic Prostate Cancer Reply
    Lindenberg, Liza
    Turkbey, Baris
    Choyke, Peter
    [J]. JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2018, 4 (05) : 749 - 750
  • [7] Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography in the management of recurrent prostate cancer
    Afaq, Asim
    Bomanji, Jamshed
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN, 2018, 128 (01) : 37 - 48
  • [8] Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography compared with diagnostic computed tomography in relapsed prostate cancer
    Asokendaran, Marcus Edward
    Meyrick, Danielle P.
    Skelly, Laura A.
    Lenzo, Nat P.
    Henderson, Andrew
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2019, 18 (03) : 232 - 237
  • [9] The Role of Radiolabeled Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for the Evaluation of Renal Cancer
    Evangelista, Laura
    Basso, Umberto
    Maruzzo, Marco
    Novara, Giacomo
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2020, 6 (01): : 146 - 150
  • [10] The CONFIRM trial protocol: the utility of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography in active surveillance for prostate cancer
    Bagguley, Dominic
    Harewood, Laurence
    McKenzie, Dean
    Ptasznik, Gideon
    Ong, Sean
    Chengodu, Thilakavathi
    Woon, Dixon
    Sim, Kenneth
    Sheldon, James
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 133 : 27 - 36