Engagement in a pilot produce prescription program in rural and urban counties in the Southeast United States

被引:0
|
作者
Owens, Caroline E. [1 ,2 ]
Cook, Miranda [3 ]
Reasoner, Tammy [4 ,5 ]
McLean, Aleta [4 ]
Girard, Amy Webb [6 ]
机构
[1] Washington State Univ, Dept Anthropol, Pullman, WA 99163 USA
[2] Emory Univ, Dept Anthropol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[3] Emory Univ, Laney Grad Sch, Atlanta, GA USA
[4] Open Hand Atlanta, Atlanta, GA USA
[5] Emory Univ, Urban Hlth Inst, Atlanta, GA USA
[6] Emory Univ, Rollins Sch Publ Hlth, Hubert Dept Global Hlth, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
produce prescription; food security; hypertension; diabetes; rural health; food is medicine; FOOD INSECURITY; PERCEPTIONS; SECURITY; DISEASE;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2024.1390737
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction In the United States, over one in every ten households experiences food insecurity. Food insecurity is associated with often co-occurring adverse health consequences, including risk for obesity, type 2 diabetes, and hypertension. Within the "Food is Medicine" intervention space, Produce Prescription Programs (PRx) seek to alleviate food insecurity and improve diet and health outcomes by leveraging access to produce through healthcare organizations. Though these programs are burgeoning across the United States, research surrounding their implementation and outreach is limited.Methods This study evaluates the implementation, reach, engagement, and retention of a PRx program piloted in two regions of Georgia (US) from 2020 to 2022. The study included 170 people living with one or more cardiometabolic conditions recruited from clinical sites in metropolitan and rural areas. The program provided pre-packaged produce boxes and nutrition education over six months. We examine participants' baseline demographics, food security status, dietary patterns, and loss to follow-up across contexts (metropolitan and rural). We employ regression analyses and model comparison approaches to identify the strongest predictors of loss to follow-up during the pilot period.Results In the pilot period of this program, 170 participants enrolled across rural and metropolitan sites. Of these, 100 individuals (59%) remained engaged for the six-month program. While many individuals met the target criteria of living with or at-risk of food insecurity, not all lived with low or very low food security. Metropolitan participants, males, and those with children in the household had significantly higher odds of loss to follow-up compared to rural participants, females, and those without children in the household. No other significant demographic or household differences were observed.Discussion This study demonstrates the potential of PRx programs to enhance food and nutrition security and cardiometabolic health in metropolitan and rural clinical settings. Future research should focus on addressing barriers to engagement and expanding the reach, impact, and sustainability of PRx programs across diverse contexts.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Dermatologist Density Between Urban and Rural Counties in the United States
    Feng, Hao
    Berk-Krauss, Juliana
    Feng, Paula W.
    Stein, Jennifer A.
    [J]. JAMA DERMATOLOGY, 2018, 154 (11) : 1265 - 1271
  • [2] Suicides in Urban and Rural Counties in the United States, 2006-2008
    Searles, Veronica B.
    Valley, Morgan A.
    Hedegaard, Holly
    Betz, Marian E.
    [J]. CRISIS-THE JOURNAL OF CRISIS INTERVENTION AND SUICIDE PREVENTION, 2014, 35 (01) : 18 - 26
  • [3] Association Between Cardiologist Density and Mortality in Urban and Rural Counties in the United States
    Minhas, Abdul Mannan Khan
    Cullen, Michael W.
    Mamas, Mamas A.
    Fudim, Marat
    Virani, Salim S.
    Khan, Sadiya S.
    Misra, Arunima
    Ballantyne, Christie M.
    Nambi, Vijay
    Abramov, Dmitry
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 210 : 279 - 282
  • [4] Bridging the Gap in Potentially Excess Deaths Between Rural and Urban Counties in the United States
    Garcia, Macarena C.
    Faul, Mark
    Dowling, Nicole F.
    Thomas, Cheryll C.
    Iademarco, Michael F.
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTS, 2020, 135 (02) : 177 - 180
  • [5] A pilot study of an online produce market combined with a fruit and vegetable prescription program for rural families
    Burrington, Christine M.
    Hohensee, Thomas E.
    Tallman, Nancy
    Gadomski, Anne M.
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE REPORTS, 2020, 17
  • [6] Infant Mortality in Rural and Nonrural Counties in the United States
    Ehrenthal, Deborah B.
    Kuo, Hsiang-Hui Daphne
    Kirby, Russell S.
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2020, 146 (05)
  • [7] Food is medicine: pilot testing a 'Produce Prescription' program in Australia
    Wu, Jason
    Trieu, Kathy
    Coyle, Daisy
    Huang, Liping
    Mozaffarian, Dariush
    MacMillan, Freya
    Wu, Ted
    Twigg, Stephen
    Wong, Jencia
    Neal, Bruce
    [J]. ANNALS OF NUTRITION AND METABOLISM, 2023, 79 : 721 - 721
  • [8] Shifting of opioid prescription rate reporting impacts both rural and urban counties
    Hudnall, Matthew
    Parton, Jason
    Lewis, Dwight
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY, 2022, 104
  • [9] Understanding the Rural-Urban Differences in Nonmedical Prescription Opioid Use and Abuse in the United States
    Keyes, Katherine M.
    Cerda, Magdalena
    Brady, Joanne E.
    Havens, Jennifer R.
    Galea, Sandro
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 104 (02) : E52 - E59
  • [10] Fresh Start: A Comprehensive Pilot Produce Prescription Program to Improve Food Literacy and Glycemic Control in Rural, Uninsured Patients
    Sastre, Lauren R.
    Stroud, Brandon J.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LIFESTYLE MEDICINE, 2023,