Uncertainty Quantification for Closed-Loop Dynamical Systems: An application-based comparison

被引:0
|
作者
Weber, Jakob [1 ]
Gurtner, Markus [1 ]
Zips, Patrik [1 ]
Kugi, Andreas [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] AIT Austrian Inst Technol GmbH, Ctr Vis Automat & Control, Vienna, Austria
[2] TU Wien, Automat & Control Inst, Vienna, Austria
关键词
D O I
10.1109/ITSC57777.2023.10422010
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
When developing safety-critical control applications such as autonomous driving, it is crucial to assess the impact of model uncertainties on the system's closed-loop behaviour. Various methods, referred to as uncertainty quantification, are available in the literature with different levels of accuracy and computational costs. This paper investigates and compares the application of different uncertainty quantification techniques based on the Unscented Transformation and the Polynomial Chaos Expansion to a highway lane change manoeuvre in a closed-loop setting. The resulting means and standard deviations of the trajectory error of the closedloop system are compared with the corresponding Monte-Carlo estimates, which serve as ground truth. It turns out that the Unscented Transformation provides accurate results at moderate computational costs and is best suitable for real-time deployment.
引用
收藏
页码:2163 / 2169
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A closed-loop identification protocol for nonlinear dynamical systems
    Feng, Xiao-jiang
    Rabitz, Herschel
    Turinici, Gabriel
    Le Bris, Claude
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A, 2006, 110 (25): : 7755 - 7762
  • [2] A Simple Framework for Identifying Dynamical Systems in Closed-Loop
    Maruta, Ichiro
    Sugie, Toshiharu
    IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 : 31441 - 31453
  • [3] Closed-Loop Variable Stiffness Control of Dynamical Systems
    Chen, Xiao
    Michel, Youssef
    Lee, Dongheui
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 IEEE-RAS 20TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMANOID ROBOTS (HUMANOIDS 2020), 2021, : 163 - 169
  • [4] A High-Performance Monte Carlo Simulation Toolbox for Uncertainty Quantification of Closed-loop Systems
    Wahlgreen, Morten Ryberg
    Reenberg, Asbjorn Thode
    Nielsen, Marcus Krogh
    Rydahl, Anton
    Ritschel, Tobias K. S.
    Dammann, Bernd
    Jorgensen, John Bagterp
    2021 60TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), 2021, : 6755 - 6761
  • [5] Application of ISFETs in closed-loop systems for greenhouses
    Gieling, TH
    vandenVlekkert, HH
    NATURAL AND ARTIFICIAL ECOSYSTEMS, 1996, 18 (4/5): : 135 - 138
  • [6] A COMPARISON OF CLOSED-LOOP AND OPEN-LOOP OPTIIMUM SYSTEMS
    THAU, FE
    WITSENHA.HS
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1966, AC11 (03) : 619 - &
  • [7] Constrained MPC under closed-loop uncertainty
    Warren, AL
    Marlin, TE
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2004 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-6, 2004, : 4607 - 4612
  • [8] COMPARISON OF OPEN-LOOP AND CLOSED-LOOP SENSITIVITIES FOR SYSTEMS WITH STOCHASTIC INPUTS
    SARMA, VVS
    SINGH, SN
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1970, AC15 (02) : 253 - &
  • [9] ON COMPARISON OF SENSITIVITIES OF OPEN-LOOP AND CLOSED-LOOP OPTIMAL CONTROL SYSTEMS
    YOULA, DC
    DORATO, P
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1968, AC13 (02) : 186 - &
  • [10] Closed-Loop Uncertainty Modeling for Visual Servoing
    Assa, Akbar
    Janabi-Sharifi, Farrokh
    2013 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION (ICRA), 2013, : 3089 - 3094