Effects of alternate wetting and drying irrigation on yield, water-saving, and emission reduction in rice fields: A global meta-analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Gao, Rong [1 ]
Zhuo, La [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Duan, Yiduo [1 ]
Yan, Chenjian [1 ]
Yue, Zhiwei [1 ]
Zhao, Zikun [3 ,4 ]
Wu, Pute [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Northwest A&F Univ, Coll Water Resources & Architectural Engn, Yangling 712100, Peoples R China
[2] Northwest A&F Univ, Coll Soil & Water Conservat Sci & Engn, Yangling 712100, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Soil & Water Conservat, Yangling 712100, Peoples R China
[4] Minist Water Resources, Yangling 712100, Peoples R China
关键词
Trade-offs; Statistic analysis; Water conservation; Greenhouse gas mitigation; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; DIRECT-SEEDED RICE; METHANE EMISSION; CARBON DYNAMICS; USE EFFICIENCY; PADDY FIELDS; MANAGEMENT; SOIL; PRODUCTIVITY; MITIGATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110075
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
With limited natural resources and uncertain climate, increasing food production must mitigate the environmental impacts. Rice, a water-intensive grain crop, contributes significantly to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in agricultural systems. Alternate Wetting and Drying (AWD) Irrigation stands out as the prevailing water-saving irrigation technique in rice fields worldwide. Nonetheless, the effects of AWD on yield variation, water conservation, and emissions reduction as well as the synergies and trade-offs between the effects remain unclear. Here a global meta-analysis of 437 literature sources covering 93 % of global rice production was conducted to quantify changes in yield, water utilization, and GHG emissions following AWD implementation. Results show that, on a global scale, AWD reduces irrigation water usage by 33.88 % and enhances water use efficiency, irrigation water use efficiency, and water productivity by 20.27 %, 47.58 %, and 29.63 %, respectively. However, there is a minor decrease in yield by 1.56 %. Notably, AWD leads to a noteworthy 47.47 % reduction in methane emissions, counterbalanced by a 52.20 % rise in N2O emissions, ultimately resulting in a decrease in global warming potential (GWP) and greenhouse gas intensity (GHGI) by 39.38 % and 38.06 %, respectively. The AWD threshold is the most significant predictive factor, adopting a suitable threshold can greatly improve the accuracy of AWD implementation. Soil properties also play a pivotal role, with pH levels > 7 or soil organic carbon (SOC) < 12 g/kg correlating to more pronounced yield losses. Implementing reasonable field management measures, such as suitable rice varieties and straw incorporation can effectively increase rice productivity. Approximately 60.36 % of the data falls within the "win-win" zone, demonstrating simultaneous in yield increases, water conservation, and emissions reduction. AWD is more suitable for acidic soils with high SOC (>12 g/kg) and a light texture. This study introduces novel insights for analyzing the synergies and trade-offs within the food-water-climate nexus.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Alternate wetting and drying: A water-saving and ecofriendly rice production system
    Ishfaq, Muhammad
    Farooq, Muhammad
    Zulfiqar, Usman
    Hussain, Saddam
    Akbar, Nadeem
    Nawaz, Ahmad
    Anjum, Shakeel Ahmad
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2020, 241
  • [2] Rice yields and water use under alternate wetting and drying irrigation: A meta-analysis
    Carrijo, Daniela R.
    Lundy, Mark E.
    Linquist, Bruce A.
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2017, 203 : 173 - 180
  • [3] Rice yield and water productivity in response to water-saving irrigation practices in China: A meta-analysis
    Yu, Qian
    Dai, Yulong
    Wei, Jun
    Wang, Jiaer
    Liao, Bin
    Cui, Yuanlai
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2024, 302
  • [4] Impact of the alternate wetting and drying (AWD) water-saving irrigation technique: Evidence from rice producers in the Philippines
    Rejesus, Roderick M.
    Palis, Florencia G.
    Rodriguez, Divina Gracia P.
    Lampayan, Ruben M.
    Bouman, Bas A. M.
    FOOD POLICY, 2011, 36 (02) : 280 - 288
  • [5] Rodent damage to rice crops is not affected by the water-saving technique, alternate wetting and drying
    Renee P. Lorica
    Grant R. Singleton
    Alexander M. Stuart
    Steven R. Belmain
    Journal of Pest Science, 2020, 93 : 1431 - 1442
  • [6] Alternate wetting and drying: a water-saving technology for sustainable rice production in Burkina Faso?
    Johnson, Jean-Martial
    Becker, Mathias
    Kabore, Jean Eric P.
    Dossou-Yovo, Elliott Ronald
    Saito, Kazuki
    NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS, 2024, 129 (01) : 93 - 111
  • [7] Rodent damage to rice crops is not affected by the water-saving technique, alternate wetting and drying
    Lorica, Renee P.
    Singleton, Grant R.
    Stuart, Alexander M.
    Belmain, Steven R.
    JOURNAL OF PEST SCIENCE, 2020, 93 (04) : 1431 - 1442
  • [8] Effects of alternate wetting and drying irrigation on yield, water and nitrogen use, and greenhouse gas emissions in rice paddy fields
    Cheng, Haomiao
    Shu, Kexin
    Zhu, Tengyi
    Wang, Liang
    Liu, Xiang
    Cai, Wei
    Qi, Zhiming
    Feng, Shaoyuan
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 349
  • [9] Adoption of alternate wetting and drying (AWD) irrigation as a water-saving technology in Bangladesh: Economic and environmental considerations
    Alauddin, Mohammad
    Sarker, Md. Abdur Rashid
    Islam, Zeenatul
    Tisdell, Clement
    LAND USE POLICY, 2020, 91
  • [10] Effects of straw returning on rice growth and yield under water-saving irrigation
    Wei, Qi
    Xu, Junzeng
    Sun, Lu
    Wang, Haiyu
    Lv, Yuping
    Li, Yawei
    Hammed, Fazli
    CHILEAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2019, 79 (01): : 66 - 74