Opportunity abandonment: Why are entrepreneurs vulnerable to type I and II errors?

被引:0
|
作者
Arshi, Tahseen Anwer [1 ]
Rao, Venkoba [2 ]
Butt, Atif Saleem [3 ]
机构
[1] Amer Univ Ras Al Khaimah, Associate Provost Res & Community Serv, Bldg 75,Sheikh Humaid Bin Mohammed Area, Seih Al Araibi 72603, Ras al Khaimah, U Arab Emirates
[2] Majan Univ Coll, Muscat, Oman
[3] Atif Saleem Butt Univ Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
关键词
Opportunity abandonment; Decision error; Reification fallacy; Construal mindsets; Stakeholders; CONSTRUAL-LEVEL THEORY; PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTANCE; DECISION-MAKING; BUSINESS MODELS; PERSPECTIVE; CAPACITY; JUDGMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30094
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Opportunity actualization is a critical competency attributed to entrepreneurs, which has received widespread attention in the entrepreneurship literature. However, the knowledge of Entrepreneurial Opportunity Abandonment (EOA) decisions is limited. We, therefore, explore the relatively under-studied EOA, analyzing why entrepreneurs commit decision errors, abandon potentially viable opportunities (type I error) or pursue non-opportunity spaces (type II error), and ultimately forsake them later. Through a scoping literature review, we highlight more profound psychological variables that shape entrepreneurial opportunity behavior triggering EOA decisions. We discuss entrepreneurial cognitive limitations in articulating, concretizing, and communicating the opportunity. We argue that varying construal mindsets cause reification fallacies and create perceptual blocks in enunciating an opportunity idea. Further, subjective stakeholder feedback and biased information exchange largely shape EOA decisions, which are mediated through the information processing capacity of entrepreneurs. Finally, we propose four entrepreneurial decision-limiting hypotheses which require an empirical investigation.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条