Effects of Maize/Peanut Intercropping and Nitrogen Fertilizer Application on Soil Fungal Community Structure

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Yongyong [1 ]
Zhao, Fengyan [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Feng, Chen [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Bai, Wei [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zhang, Zhe [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Cai, Qian [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Sun, Zhanxiang [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Feng, Liangshan [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Shenyang Agr Univ, Coll Land & Environm, Shenyang 110866, Peoples R China
[2] Liaoning Acad Agr Sci, Tillage & Cultivat Res Inst, Shenyang 110161, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Agr Expt Stn Agr Environm, Fuxin 123102, Peoples R China
[4] Minist Agr & Rural Affairs, Key Lab Water Saving Agr Northeast, Shenyang 110161, Peoples R China
来源
AGRONOMY-BASEL | 2024年 / 14卷 / 05期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
maize/peanut intercropping; nitrogen fertilizer application; soil fungal community structure; Illumina MiSeq sequencing; RHIZOSPHERES; DIVERSITY; MAIZE;
D O I
10.3390/agronomy14051053
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Maize/peanut intercropping may improve soil health through reducing nitrogen (N) fertilization. However, the effects of maize/peanut intercropping combined with reduced N fertilization on the soil fungal community structure have not been well reported. Using a long-term localized micro-zone experiment, we investigated the combined effects of intercropping and N fertilizer application on soil fungal community diversity and composition. Three cropping patterns (maize/peanut intercropping, maize monoculture, and peanut monoculture) and three N application levels (0 kg<middle dot>hm-2, 150 kg<middle dot>hm-2, and 300 kg<middle dot>hm-2) were assessed. The results showed that the total numbers of fungal species and unique species (operational taxonomic units, OTUs) in both maize and peanut soils tended to first increase and then decrease with increasing N application. Compared with monoculture, the numbers of total OTUs and unique OTUs in intercropped maize soil decreased by 4.14% and 12.79%, respectively, but the total numbers of OTUs and unique OTUs in peanut soil increased by 1.08% and 3.78%, respectively. With increasing N application, the soil fungal Ace and Chao indices of maize soil first increased and then decreased, while the fungal Shannon, Ace, and Chao indices of peanut soil decreased. Compared with the monoculture system, intercropping significantly reduced the maize soil fungal Ace and Chao indices but increased the peanut soil fungal Shannon, Ace, and Chao indices. Nitrogen application and intercropping significantly altered the fungal community structure of maize soil, while N application had no significant effect on the fungal community structure of peanut soil, though intercropping significantly changed the fungal community structure of peanut soil. At the phylum level, Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, Mortierellomycota, unclassified_k_Fungi, and Chytridiomycota were the dominant taxa. Redundancy analysis (RDA) showed that soil nitrate (NO3-) content was the main environmental factor shaping the soil fungal community. In conclusion, excessive N fertilization (300 kg<middle dot>hm-2) can reduce soil fungal community diversity; maize/peanut intercropping reversed the negative effect of N application on fungal community of peanut soil, but not that of maize soil. Soil NO3- content is the primary environmental driver of soil fungal communities.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of tobacco–peanut relay intercropping on soil bacteria community structure
    Lin Gao
    Xin-min Liu
    Yong-mei Du
    Hao Zong
    Guo-ming Shen
    [J]. Annals of Microbiology, 2019, 69 : 1531 - 1536
  • [2] Effects of Intercropping and Nitrogen Application on Soil Fertility and Microbial Communities in Peanut Rhizosphere Soil
    Wu, Haining
    Chen, Shufang
    Huang, Zhipeng
    Huang, Tangwei
    Tang, Xiumei
    He, Liangqiong
    Li, Zhong
    Xiong, Jun
    Zhong, Ruichun
    Jiang, Jing
    Han, Zhuqiang
    Tang, Ronghua
    [J]. AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2024, 14 (03):
  • [3] Effects of Maize/Peanut Intercropping on Yield and Nitrogen Uptake and Utilization under Different Nitrogen Application Rates
    Zhang, Yongyong
    Zhao, Fengyan
    Sun, Zhanxiang
    Bai, Wei
    Zhang, Zhe
    Feng, Chen
    Cai, Qian
    [J]. AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2024, 14 (06):
  • [4] Effects of tobacco-peanut relay intercropping on soil bacteria community structure
    Gao, Lin
    Liu, Xin-min
    Du, Yong-mei
    Zong, Hao
    Shen, Guo-ming
    [J]. ANNALS OF MICROBIOLOGY, 2019, 69 (13) : 1531 - 1536
  • [5] Shifts in soil microbial community, soil enzymes and crop yield under peanut/maize intercropping with reduced nitrogen levels
    Chen, Jun
    Arafat, Yasir
    Wu, Linkun
    Xiao, Zhigang
    Li, Qisong
    Khan, Muhammad Azam
    Khan, Muhammad Umar
    Lin, Sheng
    Lin, Wenxiong
    [J]. APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY, 2018, 124 : 327 - 334
  • [6] FORMS OF FERTILIZER NITROGEN RESIDUES IN SOIL AFTER INTERCROPPING OF MAIZE-COWPEA
    PATRA, DD
    SACHDEV, MS
    SUBBIAH, BV
    [J]. BIOLOGY AND FERTILITY OF SOILS, 1987, 4 (03) : 155 - 161
  • [7] Rotation of planting strips and reduction in nitrogen fertilizer application can reduce nitrogen loss and optimize its balance in maize-peanut intercropping
    Han, Fei
    Guo, Ru
    Hussain, Sadam
    Guo, Shuqing
    Cai, Tie
    Zhang, Peng
    Jia, Zhikuan
    Naseer, Muhammad Asad
    Saqib, Muhammad
    Chen, Xiaoli
    Ren, Xiaolong
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2023, 143
  • [8] Evaluation of maize/peanut intercropping effects on microbial assembly, root exudates and peanut nitrogen uptake
    Jiang, Yuhang
    Khan, Muhammad Umar
    Lin, Xiaoqin
    Lin, Zhimin
    Lin, Sheng
    Lin, Wenxiong
    [J]. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY, 2022, 171 : 75 - 83
  • [9] Effects of Combined Application of Biological Agent and Fertilizer on Fungal Community Structure in Rhizosphere Soil of Panax notoginseng
    Liu, Yanwei
    Zhou, Yingjie
    Zhang, Xiaofan
    Cao, Ni
    Li, Bin
    Liang, Jiaping
    Yang, Qiliang
    [J]. AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2023, 13 (08):
  • [10] INTERCROPPING PIGEONPEA TO CONSERVE FERTILIZER NITROGEN IN MAIZE AND PRODUCE RESIDUAL EFFECTS ON SUGARCANE
    YADAV, RL
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 1981, 17 (03) : 311 - 315