Deep active learning for misinformation detection using geometric deep learning

被引:1
|
作者
Barnabo, Giorgio [1 ]
Siciliano, Federico [1 ]
Castillo, Carlos [2 ,3 ]
Leonardi, Stefano [1 ]
Nakov, Preslav [4 ]
Da San Martino, Giovanni [5 ]
Silvestri, Fabrizio [1 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept & Org, Rome, Italy
[2] ICREA, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Pompeu Fabra Univ, Dept & Org, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Qatar Comp Res Inst, Dept & Org, Doha, Qatar
[5] Univ Padua, Dept & Org, Padua, Italy
来源
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Active learning; Fake news; Misinformation; Disinformation; Neural networks; Graph neural; NEWS;
D O I
10.1016/j.osnem.2023.100244
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Human fact-checkers currently represent a key component of any semi-automatic misinformation detection pipeline. While current state-of-the-art systems are mostly based on geometric deep-learning models, these architectures still need human-labeled data to be trained and updated - due to shifting topic distributions and adversarial attacks. Most research on automatic misinformation detection, however, neither considers time budget constraints on the number of pieces of news that can be manually fact-checked, nor tries to reduce the burden of fact-checking on - mostly pro bono - annotators and journalists. The first contribution of this work is a thorough analysis of active learning (AL) strategies applied to Graph Neural Networks (GNN) for misinformation detection. Then, based on this analysis, we propose Deep Error Sampling (DES) - a new deep active learning architecture that, when coupled with uncertainty sampling, performs equally or better than the most common AL strategies and the only existing active learning procedure specifically targeting fake news detection. Overall, our experimental results on two benchmark datasets show that all AL strategies outperform random sampling, allowing - on average - to achieve a 2% increase in AUC for the same percentage of third-party fact-checked news and to save up to 25% of labeling effort for a desired level of classification performance. As for DES, while it does not always clearly outperform other strategies, it still reduces variance in the performance between rounds, resulting in a more reliable method. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to comprehensively study active learning in the context of misinformation detection and to show its potential to reduce the burden of third-party fact-checking without compromising classification performance.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Misinformation Detection Using Deep Learning
    Tsikerdekis, Michail
    Zeadally, Sherali
    [J]. IT PROFESSIONAL, 2023, 25 (05) : 57 - 63
  • [2] Solar Active Region Detection Using Deep Learning
    Quan, Lin
    Xu, Long
    Li, Ling
    Wang, Huaning
    Huang, Xin
    [J]. ELECTRONICS, 2021, 10 (18)
  • [3] Deep active learning for object detection
    Li, Ying
    Fan, Binbin
    Zhang, Weiping
    Ding, Weiping
    Yin, Jianwei
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2021, 579 : 418 - 433
  • [4] Active Learning for Deep Object Detection
    Brust, Clemens-Alexander
    Kaeding, Christoph
    Denzler, Joachim
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 14TH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION, IMAGING AND COMPUTER GRAPHICS THEORY AND APPLICATIONS (VISAPP), VOL 5, 2019, : 181 - 190
  • [5] Deep Active Learning for Anomaly Detection
    Pimentel, Tiago
    Monteiro, Marianne
    Veloso, Adriano
    Ziviani, Nivio
    [J]. 2020 INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON NEURAL NETWORKS (IJCNN), 2020,
  • [6] A Hybrid Deep Learning Architecture for Misinformation Detection on Social Media
    Alzahrani, Amani
    Baabdullah, Tahani
    Almotairi, Aeman
    Rawat, Danda B.
    [J]. 2023 IEEE 24TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION REUSE AND INTEGRATION FOR DATA SCIENCE, IRI, 2023, : 199 - 204
  • [7] Deep learning and geometric deep learning: An introduction for mathematicians and physicists
    Fioresi, R.
    Zanchetta, F.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMETRIC METHODS IN MODERN PHYSICS, 2023, 20 (12)
  • [8] Securing social platform from misinformation using deep learning
    Roy, Pradeep Kumar
    Tripathy, Asis Kumar
    Weng, Tien-Hsiung
    Li, Kuan-Ching
    [J]. COMPUTER STANDARDS & INTERFACES, 2023, 84
  • [9] Deep Active Learning for Surface Defect Detection
    Lv, Xiaoming
    Duan, Fajie
    Jiang, Jia-Jia
    Fu, Xiao
    Gan, Lin
    [J]. SENSORS, 2020, 20 (06)
  • [10] Active Learning for Deep Detection Neural Networks
    Aghdam, Hamed H.
    Gonzalez-Garcia, Abel
    van de Weijer, Joost
    Lopez, Antonio M.
    [J]. 2019 IEEE/CVF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION (ICCV 2019), 2019, : 3671 - 3679