The Effectiveness of EduMind for Mental Health Promotion Among Youths

Introduction The global surge in mental health issues, particularly among the youth, is evident. Despite the proliferation of digital mental health services, their adoption remains limited, hindered by various barriers. To address this issue, an evidence-based, validated digital mental health intervention is necessary. Although much research has explored the effectiveness of such interventions, there was limited evidence supporting those within the youth population. The objective of this research is to assess the effects of an interventional module on depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms among youths. Methods The EduMind online mental health intervention contents were developed from a needs assessment and a scoping review of effective psychotherapies, achieving a high content validation index (CVI) of 0.96. The contents were integrated into a web application to assess its effectiveness among the target population which consisted of university students of a local institution. A quasi-experimental study compared the intervention group (n=264) to a waitlist-control group (n=200), evaluating changes in mental health status with the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale 21 (DASS-21) questionnaire using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to analyse mean differences. Results Participants in the intervention group indicated a significant decrease (p < 0.001) in depression, anxiety, and stress. The pre-test and post-test mean scores in the intervention group were 15.81 and 8.97 for depression, 11.46 and 7.02 for anxiety and 14.64 and 6.33 for stress, respectively. In the control group, there was no significant difference between the pre-test and post-test mean scores for depression. However, there was a slight significant reduction for anxiety with pre- and post-test scores of 13.31 and 12.95. Stress mean scores exhibited a slight increase, rising from 13.55 to 14.24. The final phase revealed significant improvements in mental health status between groups, with significant effect sizes for stress (eta(2)(p) = 0.57, p < 0.001), depression (eta(2)(p) = 0.71, p < 0.001), and anxiety (eta(2)(p) = 0.27, p < 0.001). Conclusion The findings contribute to the advancement of technology-assisted health services, facilitating greater uptake among the population. This study utilized a comprehensive module development framework and demonstrated the effectiveness of the expert-guided mental health intervention module. Furthermore, the study suggests potential integration with the National Strategic Plan for Mental Health 2020-2025 and the National Mental Health Policy, proposing the web application as a potential compulsory student screening tool administered by universities. The information gathered by this application could inform future research directions, propelling technological-assisted mental health services to new heights.