Comparative In Vitro Killing by Pradofloxacin in Comparison to Ceftiofur, Enrofloxacin, Florfenicol, Marbofloxacin, Tildipirosin, Tilmicosin and Tulathromycin against Bovine Respiratory Bacterial Pathogens

被引:1
|
作者
Blondeau, Joseph M. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Fitch, Shantelle D. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Microbiol, Saskatoon, SK S7N 0W8, Canada
[2] Saskatchewan Hlth Author, Saskatoon, SK S7N 0W8, Canada
[3] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Biochem, Pathol & Lab Med & Ophthalmol, Saskatoon, SK S7N 0W8, Canada
[4] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Microbiol & Immunol, Pathol & Lab Med & Ophthalmol, Saskatoon, SK S7N 0W8, Canada
关键词
killing; pradofloxacin; bovine respiratory disease; drug concentrations; antimicrobials; MPC; MUTANT PREVENTION CONCENTRATIONS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS-PSEUDINTERMEDIUS; ESCHERICHIA-COLI; CANINE STRAINS; FLUOROQUINOLONES; DOXYCYCLINE; CEFAZOLIN; SELECTION; CEFOVECIN; DISEASE;
D O I
10.3390/microorganisms12050996
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Pradofloxacin is the newest of the veterinary fluoroquinolones to be approved for use in animals-initially companion animals and most recently food animals. It has a broad spectrum of in vitro activity, working actively against Gram-positive/negative, atypical and some anaerobic microorganisms. It simultaneously targets DNA gyrase (topoisomerase type II) and topoisomerase type IV, suggesting a lower propensity to select for antimicrobial resistance. The purpose of this study was to determine the rate and extent of bacterial killing by pradofloxacin against bovine strains of Mannheimia haemolytica and Pasteurella multocida, in comparison with several other agents (ceftiofur, enrofloxacin, florfenicol, marbofloxacin, tildipirosin, tilmicosin and tulathromycin) using four clinically relevant drug concentrations: minimum inhibitory and mutant prevention drug concentration, maximum serum and maximum tissue drug concentrations. At the maximum serum and tissue drug concentrations, pradofloxacin killed 99.99% of M. haemolytica cells following 5 min of drug exposure (versus growth to 76% kill rate for the other agents) and 94.1-98.6% of P. multocida following 60-120 min of drug exposure (versus growth to 98.6% kill rate for the other agents). Statistically significant differences in kill rates were seen between the various drugs tested depending on drug concentration and time of sampling after drug exposure.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Comparative minimum inhibitory and mutant prevention drug concentrations of enrofloxacin, ceftiofur, florfenicol, tilmicosin and tulathromycin against bovine clinical isolates of Mannheimia haemolytica
    Blondeau, J. M.
    Borsos, S.
    Blondeau, L. D.
    Blondeau, B. J. J.
    Hesje, C. E.
    [J]. VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2012, 160 (1-2) : 85 - 90
  • [2] Comparative efficacy of tulathromycin versus florfenicol and tilmicosin against undifferentiated bovine respiratory disease in feedlot cattle
    Skogerboe, TL
    Rooney, KA
    Nutsch, RG
    Weigel, DJ
    Gajewski, K
    Kilgore, WR
    [J]. VETERINARY THERAPEUTICS, 2005, 6 (02) : 180 - 196
  • [3] Comparative efficacy of tulathromycin, tilmicosin, and florfenicol in the treatment of bovine respiratory disease in stocker cattle
    Nutsch, RG
    Skogerboe, TL
    Rooney, KA
    Weigel, DJ
    Gajewski, K
    Lechtenberg, KE
    [J]. VETERINARY THERAPEUTICS, 2005, 6 (02) : 167 - 179
  • [4] Mutant prevention and minimum inhibitory concentration drug values for enrofloxacin, ceftiofur, florfenicol, tilmicosin and tulathromycin tested against swine pathogens Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, Pasteurella multocida and Streptococcus suis
    Blondeau, Joseph M.
    Fitch, Shantelle D.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (01):
  • [5] In vitro activities of florfenicol against bovine and porcine respiratory tract pathogens
    Priebe, S
    Schwarz, S
    [J]. ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2003, 47 (08) : 2703 - 2705
  • [6] In vitro susceptibility of four antimicrobials against Riemerella anatipestifer isolates: a comparison of minimum inhibitory concentrations and mutant prevention concentrations for ceftiofur, cefquinome, florfenicol, and tilmicosin
    Li, Yafei
    Zhang, Yanan
    Ding, Huanzhong
    Mei, Xian
    Liu, Wei
    Zeng, Jiaxiong
    Zeng, Zhenling
    [J]. BMC VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2016, 12
  • [7] In vitro susceptibility of four antimicrobials against Riemerella anatipestifer isolates: a comparison of minimum inhibitory concentrations and mutant prevention concentrations for ceftiofur, cefquinome, florfenicol, and tilmicosin
    Yafei Li
    Yanan Zhang
    Huanzhong Ding
    Xian Mei
    Wei Liu
    Jiaxiong Zeng
    Zhenling Zeng
    [J]. BMC Veterinary Research, 12
  • [8] Comparative in vitro activity of ertapenem against bacterial pathogens isolated from patients with lower respiratory tract infections
    Hicks, PS
    Pelak, B
    Woods, GL
    Bartizal, KF
    Motyl, M
    [J]. CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2002, 8 (11) : 753 - 757
  • [9] Minimum inhibitory concentrations of tulathromycin against respiratory bacterial pathogens isolated from clinical cases in European cattle and swine and variability arising from changes in in vitro methodology
    Godinho, KS
    Jones, MA
    Keane, SG
    Weatherley, AJ
    Nanjiani, IA
    Gootz, TD
    Benchaoui, HA
    Rowan, TG
    Sunderland, SJ
    [J]. VETERINARY THERAPEUTICS, 2005, 6 (02) : 113 - 121
  • [10] Comparative in vitro activities of ceftaroline and ceftriaxone against bacterial pathogens associated with respiratory tract infections: results from the AWARE surveillance study
    Biedenbach, D. J.
    Iaconis, J. P.
    Sahm, D. F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2016, 71 (12) : 3459 - 3464