Quantitative analysis of spatiotemporal coverage and uncertainty decomposition in OCO-2/3 XCO2 across China

被引:1
|
作者
Zhang, Lili [1 ]
Cheng, Tianhai [1 ]
Yue, Tianxiang [2 ]
Li, Shenshen [1 ]
Wilson, John Peter [3 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Aerosp Informat Res Inst, Beijing 100094, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, State Key Lab Resources & Environm Informat Syst, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Southern Calif, Spatial Sci Inst, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
关键词
OCO-2/3; Quantitative assessment; Spatiotemporal coverage; XCO2 uncertainty decomposition; Regional scale; NEAR-INFRARED SENSOR; RETRIEVAL ALGORITHM; CO2; VALIDATION; SPECTROMETER; PERFORMANCE; OBJECTIVES; SCIAMACHY;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120636
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2/3 (OCO-2/3) employs a full-physics inversion algorithm and estimates the column-averaged dry air mole fraction of carbon dioxide (XCO2). This research focuses on the spatiotemporal coverage and associated uncertainties of OCO-2/3's XCO2 measurements within the Chinese region. We undertook an extensive statistical examination of the daily, weekly, 16-day, and monthly spatiotemporal coverage of XCO2 across China, employing data from both OCO-2 and OCO-3 and their amalgamated datasets. Additionally, we used a posterior error analysis method to rigorously evaluate the uncertainties induced by various input parameters in the XCO2 inversion model across different regions in China. Our findings reveal that OCO-2's spatial coverage spans 2.3-53.8% in China at a spatial resolution of 1 degrees x 1 degrees, and OCO-3's spatial coverage spans 3.3 and 47.4% across these time scales in China. Notably, the combined coverage rates of both satellites are significantly higher, ranging from 5.4 to 72.6%. Our analysis also reveals a gradual decrease in XCO2 coverage and inversion rates from north to south and west to east across China. A significant portion of the uncertainties in OCO-2/3 XCO2 measurements, over 90%, were attributed to primary error sources such as instrument, aerosol, and CO2 prior profile. Aerosol-induced errors show regional variations, with higher levels observed in Southeast China. Compared to TCCON data, the accuracy of XCO2 measurements in the two Chinese sites was lower than the global average. Our research identifies the spatiotemporal distribution and uncertainty decomposition of carbon satellites at a regional scale in China, providing an essential reference for future research.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Spectroscopic uncertainty impacts on OCO-2/3 retrievals of XCO2
    Hobbs, Jonathan M.
    Drouin, Brian J.
    Oyafuso, Fabiano
    Payne, Vivienne H.
    Gunson, Michael R.
    McDuffie, James
    Mlawer, Eli J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE SPECTROSCOPY & RADIATIVE TRANSFER, 2020, 257
  • [2] Evaluation and attribution of OCO-2 XCO2 uncertainties
    Worden, John R.
    Doran, Gary
    Kulawik, Susan
    Eldering, Annmarie
    Crisp, David
    Frankenberg, Christian
    O'Dell, Chris
    Bowman, Kevin
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2017, 10 (07) : 2759 - 2771
  • [3] Analysis of 3D cloud effects in OCO-2 XCO2 retrievals
    Massie, Steven T.
    Cronk, Heather
    Merrelli, Aronne
    O'Dell, Christopher
    Schmidt, K. Sebastian
    Chen, Hong
    Baker, David
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2021, 14 (02) : 1475 - 1499
  • [4] OCO-2 XCO2 VALIDATION USING TCCON DATA
    Liang, Ailin
    Gong, Wei
    Han, Ge
    [J]. 2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2016, : 830 - 833
  • [5] Deriving Full-Coverage and Fine-Scale XCO2 Across China Based on OCO-2 Satellite Retrievals and CarbonTracker Output
    He, Changpei
    Ji, Mingrui
    Li, Tao
    Liu, Xinyi
    Tang, Die
    Zhang, Shifu
    Luo, Yuzhou
    Grieneisen, Michael L.
    Zhou, Zihang
    Zhan, Yu
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 49 (12)
  • [6] Quantification of uncertainties in OCO-2 measurements of XCO2: simulations and linear error analysis
    Connor, Brian
    Bosch, Hartmut
    McDuffie, James
    Taylor, Tommy
    Fu, Dejian
    Frankenberg, Christian
    O'Dell, Chris
    Payne, Vivienne H.
    Gunson, Michael
    Pollock, Randy
    Hobbs, Jonathan
    Oyafuso, Fabiano
    Jiang, Yibo
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2016, 9 (10) : 5227 - 5238
  • [7] Aerosols in OCO-2/GOSAT retrievals of XCO2: An information content and error analysis
    Sanghavi, Suniti
    Nelson, Robert
    Frankenberg, Christian
    Gunson, Michael
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 251
  • [8] IMPROVED ACCURACY OF XCO2 RETRIEVAL BASED ON OCO-2 RTRETRIEVALFRAMEWORK MODEL
    Yuan, Tao
    Xue, Yong
    Zhao, Liang
    Jin, Chunlin
    Li, Shengwei
    Li, Pei
    [J]. IGARSS 2023 - 2023 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, 2023, : 2109 - 2112
  • [9] Spatial distribution of XCO2 using OCO-2 data in growing seasons
    Siabi, Zhaleh
    Falahatkar, Samereh
    Alavi, Seyed Jalil
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 244 : 110 - 118
  • [10] Generating daily high-resolution and full-coverage XCO2 across China from 2015 to 2020 based on OCO-2 and CAMS data
    Li, Tongwen
    Wu, Jingan
    Wang, Tianxing
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 893