Comparison of outcomes from tunnelled femorally inserted central catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters: a propensity score-matched cohort study

被引:1
|
作者
Mcmanus, Craig [1 ]
Mifflin, Nicholas [1 ]
Rivera, Renz [2 ]
Vause, Sophie [1 ]
Tran, Ton [2 ]
Ostroff, Matthew [3 ]
Harrowell, Lorenza [2 ,4 ]
Frost, Steven [4 ]
Alexandrou, Evan [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Liverpool Hosp, Intens Care Unit, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
[2] Liverpool Hosp, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
[3] St Josephs Hlth & Med Ctr, Emerson, NJ USA
[4] Univ Wollongong, Fac Sci Med & Hlth, Sch Nursing, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 05期
关键词
intensive & critical care; internal medicine; vascular medicine; infection control; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER; INFECTION RISK; THROMBOSIS; THROMBOEMBOLISM; COMPLICATIONS; PICC;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081749
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To compare catheter-related outcomes of individuals who received a tunnelled femorally inserted central catheter (tFICC) with those who received a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) in the upper extremities. Design A propensity-score matched cohort study. Setting A 980-bed tertiary referral hospital in South West Sydney, Australia. Participants In-patients referred to the hospital central venous access service for the insertion of a central venous access device. Primary and secondary outcome measures The primary outcome of interest was the incidence of all-cause catheter failure. Secondary outcomes included the rates of catheters removed because of suspected or confirmed catheter-associated infection, catheter dwell and confirmed upper or lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Results The overall rate of all-cause catheter failure in the matched tFICC and PICC cohort was 2.4/1000 catheter days (95% CI 1.1 to 4.4) and 3.0/1000 catheter days (95% CI 2.3 to 3.9), respectively, and when compared, no difference was observed (difference -0.63/1000 catheter days, 95% CI -2.32 to 1.06). We found no differences in catheter dwell (mean difference of 14.2 days, 95% CI -6.6 to 35.0, p=0.910); or in the cumulative probability of failure between the two groups within the first month of dwell (p=0.358). No significant differences were observed in the rate of catheters requiring removal for confirmed central line-associated bloodstream infection (difference 0.13/1000 catheter day, 95% CI -0.36 to 0.63, p=0.896). Similarly, no significant differences were found between the groups for confirmed catheter-related DVT (difference -0.11 per 1000 catheter days, 95% CI -0.26 to 0.04, p=1.00). Conclusion There were no differences in catheter-related outcomes between the matched cohort of tFICC and PICC patients, suggesting that tFICCs are a possible alternative for vascular access when the veins of the upper extremities or thoracic region are not viable for catheterisation.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Tunnelled peripherally Inserted Central Catheters
    Grassi, O.
    Mordenti, P.
    Oleari, F.
    Bontini, S.
    Carini, S.
    Castellani, S.
    Gozzo, C.
    Muroni, M.
    Cordani, M. R.
    Cremona, G.
    Cavanna, L.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2015, 26 : 107 - 107
  • [2] Peripherally inserted central catheters for parenteral nutrition: A comparison with centrally inserted catheters
    Duerksen, DR
    Papineau, N
    Siemens, J
    Yaffe, C
    JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND ENTERAL NUTRITION, 1999, 23 (02) : 85 - 89
  • [3] Peripherally inserted central catheters
    Yaghmai, B
    Owens, CA
    Warner, D
    SEMINARS IN INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 1998, 15 (03) : 305 - 314
  • [4] Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters
    Bourgeois, Fabienne C.
    Lamagna, Paula
    Chiang, Vincent W.
    PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2011, 27 (06) : 556 - 561
  • [5] Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters and Hemodialysis Outcomes
    McGill, Rita L.
    Ruthazer, Robin
    Meyer, Klemens B.
    Miskulin, Dana C.
    Weiner, Daniel E.
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2016, 11 (08): : 1434 - 1440
  • [6] Central venous pressure from peripherally inserted central catheters correlates well with that of centrally inserted central catheters
    Alansari, M
    Hijazi, M
    CHEST, 2004, 126 (04) : 873S - 873S
  • [7] The Problem With Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters
    Chopra, Vineet
    Flanders, Scott A.
    Saint, Sanjay
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 308 (15): : 1527 - 1528
  • [8] PERIPHERALLY INSERTED CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERS
    RYDER, MA
    NURSING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1993, 28 (04) : 937 - 971
  • [9] Peripherally inserted central catheters revisited
    Smith, JR
    Friedell, ML
    Cheatham, ML
    Martin, SP
    Cohen, MJ
    Horowitz, JD
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1998, 176 (02): : 208 - 211
  • [10] PERIPHERALLY INSERTED CENTRAL CATHETERS IN CHILDREN
    CHAIT, PG
    INGRAM, J
    PHILLIPSGORDON, C
    FARRELL, H
    KUHN, C
    RADIOLOGY, 1995, 197 (03) : 775 - 778