Patient-Friendly Discharge Summaries in Korea Based on ChatGPT: Software Development and Validation

被引:0
|
作者
Kim, Hanjae [1 ]
Jin, Hee Min [2 ]
Bin Jung, Yoon [3 ]
You, Seng Chan [2 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Nursing, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Dept Biomed Syst Informat, Coll Med, 50-1 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 03722, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
ChatGPT; Artificial Intelligence; Large Language Model; Patient Discharge Summaries; Patient-Centered Care; Documentation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Although discharge summaries in patient-friendly language can enhance patient comprehension and satisfaction, they can also increase medical staff workload. Using a large language model, we developed and validated software that generates a patient-friendly discharge summary. Methods: We developed and tested the software using 100 discharge summary documents, 50 for patients with myocardial infarction and 50 for patients treated in the Department of General Surgery. For each document, three new summaries were generated using three different prompting methods (Zero-shot, One-shot, and Few-shot) and graded using a 5-point Likert Scale regarding factuality, comprehensiveness, usability, ease, and fluency. We compared the effects of different prompting methods and assessed the relationship between input length and output quality. Results: The mean overall scores differed across prompting methods (4.19 +/- 0.36 in Few-shot, 4.11 +/- 0.36 in One-shot, and 3.73 +/- 0.44 in Zero-shot; P < 0.001). Post-hoc analysis indicated that the scores were higher with Few-shot and One-shot prompts than in zero-shot prompts, whereas there was no significant difference between Few-shot and One-shot prompts. The overall proportion of outputs that scored >= 4 was 77.0% (95% confidence interval: 68.8-85.3%), 70.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 61.0-79.0%), and 32.0% (95% CI, 22.9-41.1%) with Few-shot, One-shot, and Zero-shot prompts, respectively. The mean factuality score was 4.19 +/- 0.60 with Few-shot, 4.20 +/- 0.55 with One-shot, and 3.82 +/- 0.57 with Zero-shot prompts. Input length and the overall score showed negative correlations in the Zero-shot (r = -0.437, P < 0.001) and One-shot (r = -0.327, P < 0.001) tests but not in the Few-shot (r = -0.050, P = 0.625) tests. Conclusion: Large-language models utilizing Few-shot prompts generally produce acceptable discharge summaries without significant misinformation. Our research highlights the potential of such models in creating patient-friendly discharge summaries for Korean patients to support patient-centered care.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development and validation of patient-friendly medication plans
    Wuyts, Joke
    Brebels, An
    Demarsin, Lisse
    Foulon, Veerle
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2018, 40 (01) : 204 - 205
  • [2] Generative Artificial Intelligence to Transform Inpatient Discharge Summaries to Patient-Friendly Language and Format
    Zaretsky, Jonah
    Kim, Jeong Min
    Baskharoun, Samuel
    Zhao, Yunan
    Austrian, Jonathan
    Aphinyanaphongs, Yindalon
    Gupta, Ravi
    Blecker, Saul B.
    Feldman, Jonah
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2024, 7 (03) : E240357
  • [3] Translating musculoskeletal radiology reports into patient-friendly summaries using ChatGPT-4: additional considerations
    Arachchige, Arosh S. Perera Molligoda
    SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 53 (8) : 1625 - 1625
  • [4] Response to comment regarding "Translating musculoskeletal radiology reports into patient-friendly summaries using ChatGPT-4"
    Kuckelman, Ian J.
    Wetley, Karla
    Yi, Paul Hyunsoo
    Ross, Andrew Bailey
    SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 53 (08) : 1627 - 1627
  • [5] ACR Appropriateness Criteria Patient-Friendly Summaries and Patient-Friendly Animations: Initiatives to Engage Patients and Promote Shared Decision Making
    Kitts, Andrea Borondy
    Marquiss, Kelly
    Reuss, Ted
    Samples, Meg
    Waldrip, Christine
    Vincoff, Nina S.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 21 (01) : 34 - 39
  • [6] Development of a Patient-Friendly Lung Cancer Lexicon
    Feldman, J.
    Daaboul, N.
    Husain, H.
    Montague, D.
    Patil, T.
    Hull, M.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2024, 19 (10) : S287 - S288
  • [7] Development of a Surgeon and Patient-Friendly Orthopedic Surgical Robot
    Zhu, Shijie
    Zhao, Zhe
    Chen, Yu
    Deng, Jiuzheng
    Zhu, Jianjin
    Pan, Yongwei
    Zheng, Gangtie
    2021 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MEDICAL ROBOTICS (ISMR), 2021,
  • [8] Patient-Friendly Summary of the ACR Appropriateness Criteria: Evaluation of Nipple Discharge
    Quinlan, Casey
    Vincoff, Nina S.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 19 (11) : E57 - E57
  • [9] Diagnosis clarification by generalization to patient-friendly terms and definitions: Validation study
    van Mens, Hugo J. T.
    Martens, Savine S. M.
    Paiman, Elisabeth H. M.
    Mertens, Alexander C.
    Nienhuis, Remko
    de Keizer, Nicolette F.
    Cornet, Ronald
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2022, 129
  • [10] What Happened to Me while I Was in the Hospital? Challenges and Opportunities for Generating Patient-Friendly Hospitalization Summaries
    Sabita Acharya
    Andrew D. Boyd
    Richard Cameron
    Karen Dunn Lopez
    Pamela Martyn-Nemeth
    Carolyn Dickens
    Amer Ardati
    Jose D. Flores
    Matt Baumann
    Betty Welland
    Barbara Di Eugenio
    Journal of Healthcare Informatics Research, 2019, 3 : 107 - 123