Effectiveness and Safety of Left Distal Transradial Access in Coronary Procedures in the Caribbean

被引:1
|
作者
Seecheran, Naveen A. [1 ]
Quert, Abel Y. Leyva [2 ]
Seecheran, Valmiki K. [3 ]
Seecheran, Rajeev, V [4 ]
Katwaroo, Arun [5 ]
Jagdeo, Cathy-Lee [2 ]
Rafeeq, Salma [2 ]
Ramcharan, Priya [2 ]
Peram, Lakshmipathi [2 ]
Ramlal, Ravi [2 ]
Ramlackhansingh, Anil [1 ]
Giddings, Stanley [1 ]
Sandy, Sherry [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ West Indies, Clin Med Sci, St Augustine, Trinidad Tobago
[2] Eric Williams Med Sci Complex, Er Williams Med Sci Complex, Mt Hope, Trinidad Tobago
[3] Eric Williams Med Sci Complex, Er Williams Med Sci Complex, Mt Hope, Trinidad Tobago
[4] Univ Kansas, Internal Med, Med Ctr, Wichita, KS USA
[5] Trinidad Inst Med Technol, Internal Med, St Augustine, Trinidad Tobago
关键词
primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pci); radial artery occlusion (rao); snuffbox access; distal transradial access (dtra); transradial access (tra); RADIAL ARTERY-OCCLUSION; DUPLEX ULTRASOUND; ANGIOGRAPHY; INTERVENTION; PLETHYSMOGRAPHY; CATHETERIZATION; ASSOCIATION; PREVENTION; EFFICACY; PATENCY;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.54601
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: This retrospective study investigated the effectiveness and safety of left distal transradial access (LDTRA) in patients with cardiovascular disease in Trinidad undergoing coronary angiography (CAG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Method: Procedural parameters, including technical success and safety outcomes such as vascular complications and radial artery occlusion (RAO), were assessed in 111 consecutive patients undergoing CAG or PCI from January 2023 to June 2023 at the Eric Williams Medical Sciences Complex, Trinidad and Tobago. Eighty-eight patients underwent LDTRA, while 23 received left transradial access (LTRA). Results: There was no difference in procedural success with LDTRA compared to LTRA, 90.9% vs. 100%, p-value 0.202, non-significant (ns). LDTRA was associated with shorter fluoroscopy times (8.4 +/- 6.8 minutes vs. 12.4 +/- 7.7 minutes, p-value = 0.02), procedural duration (26.7 +/- 18 minutes vs. 35.8 +/- 20 minutes, p-value = 0.04), and hemostasis time (142 +/- 41 minutes vs. 186 +/- 44 minutes, p-value < 0.05). There were no significant differences in procedural-related complications (8% for LDTRA vs. 4.3% for LTRA, p-value = 0.476, ns). There were no reported cases of RAO. In the subgroup of patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), the fluoroscopy and procedure times were similar for both access sites; however, LDTRA was associated with a shorter hemostasis time (128 +/- 30 minutes vs. 194 +/- 39 minutes, p-value = 0.01). Conclusions: LDTRA is effective and safe for coronary procedures and is associated with a shorter hemostasis time. This study may prove clinically pertinent in a limited-resource Caribbean setting.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Left distal transradial access in the anatomical snuffbox for percutaneous coronary intervention
    Courtis, Javier
    Dimitroff, Magdalena
    Gonzalez, Analia
    REVISTA DE LA FEDERACION ARGENTINA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2019, 48 (01): : 30 - 34
  • [2] The Left Distal Transradial Artery Access for Coronary Angiography and Intervention: A US Experience
    Al-Azizi, Karim M.
    Grewal, Vikram
    Gobeil, Kyle
    Maqsood, Khawar
    Haider, Ali
    Mohani, Amir
    Giugliano, Gregory
    Lotfi, Amir S.
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2019, 20 (09) : 786 - 789
  • [3] Distal Transradial Access for Coronary Procedures Old Certainties, Novel Challenges, and Future Horizons
    Valgimigli, Marco
    Landi, Antonio
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2022, 15 (01) : 33 - 38
  • [4] Feasibility and Safety of Distal Transradial Access in the Anatomical Snuffbox for Coronary Angiography and Intervention
    Singha, Chayan
    Shahriar, Md Saqif
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 73 (15) : S11 - S12
  • [5] A Meta-Analysis of Traditional Radial Access and Distal Radial Access in Transradial Access for Percutaneous Coronary Procedures
    Isath, Ameesh
    Elson, David
    Kayani, Waleed
    Wang, Zhen
    Sharma, Samin
    Naidu, Srihari S.
    Jneid, Hani
    Krittanawong, Chayakrit
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2023, 46 : 21 - 26
  • [6] Distal Transradial Access for Coronary Angiography and Interventions
    Manolo, Rubio
    Shirwany, Hamid A. K.
    Monnin, Scott R.
    Khouzam, Rami N.
    CURRENT PROBLEMS IN CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 46 (03)
  • [7] Distal Transradial Access in the Anatomical Snuffbox for Interventional Coronary Procedures: Analysis of Access Site Pain and Complications
    Barbosa, Roberto R.
    De Barros, Lucas
    Sylvestre, Rodolfo C.
    Belloti, Vitor L.
    de Oliveira, Guilherme F.
    Ferraz, Rodrigo D.
    de Aragao, Bruno P.
    Calil, Osmar A.
    Serpa, Renato
    Barbosa, Luiz Fernando M.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (02)
  • [8] Comparison of Distal Transradial Access in Anatomic Snuffbox Versus Transradial Access for Coronary Angiography
    Lu, Hongjiang
    Wu, Danning
    Chen, Xiang
    HEART SURGERY FORUM, 2020, 23 (04): : E407 - E410
  • [9] Distal transradial versus conventional transradial access in acute coronary syndrome
    Erdem, Kenan
    Kurtoglu, Ertugrul
    Kucuk, Mehmet Alparslan
    Ilgenli, Tevfik Fikret
    Kizmaz, Muhammet
    TURK KARDIYOLOJI DERNEGI ARSIVI-ARCHIVES OF THE TURKISH SOCIETY OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 49 (04): : 257 - +
  • [10] Left distal transradial access in the anatomical snuffbox for coronary angiography (ldTRA) and interventions (ldTRI)
    Kiemeneij, Ferdinand
    EUROINTERVENTION, 2017, 13 (07) : 851 - 857