A systematic review of technology in the after-action review (or debrief)

被引:0
|
作者
Keiser, Nathanael L. [1 ]
机构
[1] US Army Res Inst Behav & Social Sci, 36000 Shoemaker Lane, Ft Cavazos, TX 76544 USA
关键词
after-action review; debrief; technology; recommendations; HIGH-FIDELITY SIMULATION; EVENT REVIEWS; TEAM PERFORMANCE; MODERATING ROLE; VIRTUAL TEAMS; OUTCOMES; SCIENCE; METAANALYSIS; INSTRUCTION; FEEDBACK;
D O I
10.1177/20413866241245314
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The after-action review (AAR), also termed debrief, is a training approach that commonly encompasses some form of technology, but technology is largely a tangential consideration, which serves as the impetus for this review. Based on a systematic review of 91 empirical studies (113 AARs), a variety of nuances are identified about (1) where in the AAR technology is used, and the (2) users, (3) type, and (4) use of that technology. Technology is indeed common to AARs, but typically relegated to either aid in the task performance episode (92%) or in the provision of task feedback (52%). More broadly, the findings from the present review reflect the inherent complexity of determining how best to use technology in AARs with little extant guidance. These findings are followed by a set of six recommendations that will ideally spur greater use of technology in AARs to address longstanding issues that attenuate its effectiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 477
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of the After-Action Review (or Debrief) and Factors That Influence Its Effectiveness
    Keiser, Nathanael L.
    Arthur, Winfred, Jr.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 106 (07) : 1007 - 1032
  • [2] A Meta-Analysis of Task and Training Characteristics that Contribute to or Attenuate the Effectiveness of the After-Action Review (or Debrief)
    Nathanael L. Keiser
    Winfred Arthur,
    [J]. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2022, 37 : 953 - 976
  • [3] A Meta-Analysis of Task and Training Characteristics that Contribute to or Attenuate the Effectiveness of the After-Action Review (or Debrief)
    Keiser, Nathanael L.
    Arthur, Winfred, Jr.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 37 (05) : 953 - 976
  • [4] After-Action Review for AI (AAR/AI)
    Dodge, Jonathan
    Khanna, Roli
    Irvine, Jed
    Lam, Kin-ho
    Mai, Theresa
    Lin, Zhengxian
    Kiddle, Nicholas
    Newman, Evan
    Anderson, Andrew
    Raja, Sai
    Matthews, Caleb
    Perdriau, Christopher
    Burnett, Margaret
    Fern, Alan
    [J]. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2021, 11 (3-4)
  • [5] Boston Marathon bombings: An after-action review
    Millham, Frederick Heaton
    Burke, Peter
    Gates, Jonathan
    Gupta, Alok
    Mooney, David
    Rabinovici, Reuven
    Yaffe, Michael B.
    Velmahos, George C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2014, 77 (03): : 501 - 503
  • [6] Trainee Evaluation Through After-action Review by Comparison
    Fernlund, Hans
    Gonzalez, Avelino J.
    Ekblad, Joakim
    Rodriguez, Adelein
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEFENSE MODELING AND SIMULATION-APPLICATIONS METHODOLOGY TECHNOLOGY-JDMS, 2009, 6 (03): : 135 - 150
  • [7] Assessment of Manned-Unmanned Team Performance: Comprehensive After-Action Review Technology Development
    Brewer, Ralph W., II
    Walker, Anthony J.
    Pursel, E. Ray
    Cerame, Eduardo J.
    Baker, Anthony L.
    Schaefer, Kristin E.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN HUMAN FACTORS IN ROBOTS AND UNMANNED SYSTEMS, 2020, 962 : 119 - 130
  • [8] Leadership During the Boston Marathon Bombings: A Qualitative After-Action Review
    Goralnick, Eric
    Halpern, Pinchas
    Loo, Stephanie
    Gates, Jonathan
    Biddinger, Paul
    Fisher, John
    Velmahos, George
    Chung, Sarita
    Mooney, David
    Brown, Calvin
    Barnewolt, Brien
    Burke, Peter
    Gupta, Alok
    Ulrich, Andrew
    Hojman, Horacio
    McNulty, Eric
    Dorn, Barry
    Marcus, Leonard
    Peleg, Kobi
    [J]. DISASTER MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH PREPAREDNESS, 2015, 9 (05) : 489 - 495
  • [9] Keeping It "Organized and Logical": After-Action Review for AI (AAR/AI)
    Mai, Theresa
    Khanna, Roli
    Dodge, Jonathan
    Irvine, Jed
    Lam, Kin-Ho
    Lin, Zhengxian
    Kiddle, Nicholas
    Newman, Evan
    Raja, Sai
    Matthews, Caleb
    Perdriau, Christopher
    Burnett, Margaret
    Fern, Alan
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 25TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT USER INTERFACES, IUI 2020, 2020, : 465 - 476
  • [10] An after-action review tool for EDs: learning from mass casualty incidents
    Tami, Greenberg
    Bruria, Adini
    Fabiana, Eden
    Tami, Chen
    Tali, Ankri
    Limor, Aharonson-Daniel
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2013, 31 (05): : 798 - 802