Genomic profiling of pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma reveals a genomic signature distinct from that of embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma

被引:0
|
作者
Saoud, Carla [1 ]
Dermawan, Josephine K. [2 ]
Sharma, Aarti E. [3 ]
Tap, William [4 ]
Wexler, Leonard H. [5 ]
Antonescu, Cristina R. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, New York, NY USA
[2] Cleveland Clin, Robert J Tomsich Pathol & Lab Med Inst, Cleveland, OH USA
[3] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Pathol, Boston, MA USA
[4] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Med, New York, NY USA
[5] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Pediat, New York, NY USA
[6] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065 USA
来源
GENES CHROMOSOMES & CANCER | 2024年 / 63卷 / 05期
关键词
embryonal; genomics; pleomorphic; rhabdomyosarcoma; SOFT-TISSUE SARCOMA; CHILDHOOD RHABDOMYOSARCOMA; ALVEOLAR RHABDOMYOSARCOMA; FUSION GENE; MUTATION; ADULT; CLASSIFICATION; IDENTIFICATION; DIAGNOSIS; ANAPLASIA;
D O I
10.1002/gcc.23238
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma (PRMS) is a rare and highly aggressive sarcoma, occurring mostly in the deep soft tissues of middle-aged adults and showing a variable degree of skeletal muscle differentiation. The diagnosis is challenging as pathologic features overlap with embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (ERMS), malignant Triton tumor, and other pleomorphic sarcomas. As recurrent genetic alterations underlying PRMS have not been described to date, ancillary molecular diagnostic testing is not useful in subclassification. Herein, we perform genomic profiling of a well-characterized cohort of 14 PRMS, compared to a control group of 23 ERMS and other pleomorphic sarcomas (undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma and pleomorphic liposarcoma) using clinically validated DNA-targeted Next generation sequencing (NGS) panels (MSK-IMPACT). The PRMS cohort included eight males and six females, with a median age of 53 years (range 31-76 years). Despite similar tumor mutation burdens, the genomic landscape of PRMS, with a high frequency of TP53 (79%) and RB1 (43%) alterations, stood in stark contrast to ERMS, with 4% and 0%, respectively. CDKN2A deletions were more common in PRMS (43%), compared to ERMS (13%). In contrast, ERMS harbored somatic driver mutations in the RAS pathway and loss of function mutations in BCOR, which were absent in PRMS. Copy number variations in PRMS showed multiple chromosomal arm-level changes, most commonly gains of chr17p and chr22q and loss of chr6q. Notably, gain of chr8, commonly seen in ERMS (61%) was conspicuously absent in PRMS. The genomic profiles of other pleomorphic sarcomas were overall analogous to PRMS, showing shared alterations in TP53, RB1, and CDKN2A. Overall survival and progression-free survival of PRMS were significantly worse (p < 0.0005) than that of ERMS. Our findings revealed that the molecular landscape of PRMS aligns with other adult pleomorphic sarcomas and is distinct from that of ERMS. Thus, NGS assays may be applied in select challenging cases toward a refined classification. Finally, our data corroborate the inclusion of PRMS in the therapeutic bracket of pleomorphic sarcomas, given that their clinical outcomes are comparable.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comprehensive Genomic Profiling of Pleomorphic Rhabdomyosarcoma Reveals a Genomic Signature Distinct from that of Embryonal Rhabdomyosarcoma
    Saoud, Carla
    Dermawan, Josephine
    Sharma, Aarti
    Wexler, Leonard
    Antonescu, Cristina
    [J]. LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2024, 104 (03) : S74 - S75
  • [2] Novel genomic imbalances in embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma revealed by comparative genomic hybridization and fluorescence in situ hybridization: An intergroup rhabdomyosarcoma study
    Bridge, JA
    Liu, J
    Weibolt, V
    Baker, KS
    Perry, D
    Kruger, R
    Qualman, S
    Barr, F
    Sorensen, P
    Triche, T
    Suijkerbuijk, R
    [J]. GENES CHROMOSOMES & CANCER, 2000, 27 (04): : 337 - 344
  • [3] Embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma of the cervix with focal pleomorphic areas
    Houghton, J. P.
    McCluggage, W. G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2007, 60 (01) : 88 - 89
  • [4] Single-cell transcriptional profiling reveals the heterogeneity in embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma
    Hong, Bo
    Xia, Tian
    Ye, Chun-Jing
    Zhan, Yong
    Yang, Ran
    Liu, Jia
    Li, Yi
    Chen, Zhi-Xue
    Yao, Wei
    Li, Kai
    Wang, Jia
    Dong, Kui-Ran
    Dong, Rui
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (31)
  • [5] Anaplastic (pleomorphic) subtype embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma of the cervix.
    Caruso R.A.
    Napoli P.
    Villari D.
    Starrantino M.
    [J]. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2004, 270 (4) : 278 - 280
  • [6] EXPRESSION AND GENOMIC STATUS OF ALK RECEPTOR TYROSINE KINASE IN ALVEOLAR AND EMBRYONAL RHABDOMYOSARCOMA
    Bonvini, Paolo
    Zin, Angelica
    Alaggio, Rita
    Pawel, Bruce
    Yamamoto, Tadashi
    Bisogno, Gianni
    Rosolen, Angelo
    [J]. PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2012, 59 (06) : 1065 - 1065
  • [7] Expression and genomic status of EGFR and ErbB-2 in alveolar and embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma
    Ganti, Ramapriya
    Skapek, Stephen X.
    Zhang, Jie
    Fuller, Christine E.
    Wu, Jianrong
    Billups, Catherine A.
    Breitfeld, Philip P.
    Dalton, James D.
    Meyer, William H.
    Khoury, Joseph D.
    [J]. MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2006, 19 (09) : 1213 - 1220
  • [8] Genomic Determinants of Clinical Outcomes in Rhabdomyosarcoma
    Casey, Dana L.
    Wexler, Leonard H.
    Pitter, Kenneth L.
    Samstein, Robert M.
    Slotkin, Emily K.
    Wolden, Suzanne L.
    [J]. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 26 (05) : 1135 - 1140
  • [9] Distinct clonal evolution in a case with anaplastic embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma
    Kato, Keisuke
    Yoshimi, Ai
    Noda, Asami
    Otani, Haruo
    Hojo, Hiroshi
    Tanaka, Mio
    Tanaka, Yukichi
    Ito, Yumi
    Nishimura, Riki
    Takita, Junko
    Yanai, Toshihiro
    Koike, Kazutoshi
    Tsuchida, Masahiro
    [J]. PEDIATRICS INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 63 (07) : 782 - 789
  • [10] Aberrant CDK4 Amplification in Refractory Rhabdomyosarcoma as Identified by Genomic Profiling
    Silvia Park
    Jeeyun Lee
    In-Gu Do
    Jiryeon Jang
    Kyoohyoung Rho
    Seonjoo Ahn
    Lira Maruja
    Sung Joo Kim
    Kyoung-Mee Kim
    Mao Mao
    Ensel Oh
    Yu Jin Kim
    Jhingook Kim
    Yoon-La Choi
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 4