“Fuzzy” estimating of the in-flight geometric calibration parameters

被引:0
|
作者
Tkachenko A.I. [1 ]
机构
[1] International Research and Training Center of Information Technologies and Systems, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, Kiev
来源
关键词
Fuzzy observer; Geo-referencing; Imaging camera; In-flight geometric calibration; Known and unknown landmarks; Spacecraft; Star tracker;
D O I
10.1615/JAutomatInfScien.v51.i3.50
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The goal of this work is to study opportunities to improve an accuracy and reliability of in-flight geometric calibration of the spacecraft imaging complex using known and unknown landmarks. Here calibration is interpreted as making more precise the mutual angular position of onboard imaging camera and a star tracker in a spacecraft body. It is an obligatory part of an optical-electronic complex preparation for imaging and geo-referencing of ground objects. The received snapshots, the readings of star tracker and GPS are processed on the ground. In calibration the use is made of known and unknown landmarks. There exist methods of in-flight geometric calibration based on forming measuring equations of various physical origin. These equations are solved by the least square method. Usually snapshots of known landmarks are used but there could be problem solutions with unknown landmarks involved. This work suggests the approach to solving the in-flight geometric calibration problem using formulas of fuzzy observer rather than the least square method. In many cases such approach allows one to weaken the negative impact of disturbances and sensor errors onto accuracy of estimating calibration parameters. The essential feature of the observer realization process is its recursive character. The obtained estimates are made more precise not by a manifold of received snapshots at once, but by each snapshot successively. Such approach allows us to improve convergence of estimates. As in this case the estimated parameters of calibration are constant there is no need for a stage of prognosis peculiar for such algorithm and only update procedure is used. Presentation and arguments are provided with a sufficient volume of computer simulation and analysis of its results. They confirm the above mentioned advantages of fuzzy observer as compared with the least square method for in-flight geometric calibration. © 2019 by Begell House Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 55
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Removal of anomalous errors of in-flight geometric calibration
    Tkachenko A.I.
    [J]. Journal of Automation and Information Sciences, 2019, 51 (11) : 14 - 21
  • [2] STRENGTHENED CONVERGENCE OF ESTIMATIONS IN THE IN-FLIGHT GEOMETRIC CALIBRATION
    Tkachenko, A., I
    [J]. SPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-KOSMICNA NAUKA I TEHNOLOGIA, 2019, 25 (04): : 41 - 47
  • [3] IN-FLIGHT GEOMETRIC CALIBRATION OF THE LUNAR RECONNAISSANCE ORBITER CAMERA
    Speyerer, E. J.
    Wagner, R. V.
    Robinson, M. S.
    Humm, D. C.
    Becker, K.
    Anderson, J.
    Thomas, P.
    [J]. XXII ISPRS CONGRESS, TECHNICAL COMMISSION IV, 2012, 39-B4 : 511 - 516
  • [4] On the problem of in-flight geometric calibration using unknown landmarks
    Tkachenko, A.I.
    [J]. Journal of Automation and Information Sciences, 2014, 46 (01) : 42 - 52
  • [5] MISR in-flight camera geometric model calibration and georectification performance
    Jovanovic, VM
    Bull, MA
    Smyth, MM
    Zong, J
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2002, 40 (07): : 1512 - 1519
  • [6] A combined algorithm of the in-flight geometric calibration using unknown landmarks
    Tkachenko A.I.
    [J]. Journal of Automation and Information Sciences, 2019, 51 (01) : 41 - 48
  • [7] ANALYTICAL IN-FLIGHT CALIBRATION
    ANDERSON, JM
    LEE, C
    [J]. PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 1975, 41 (11): : 1337 - 1348
  • [8] SWS in-flight calibration
    Shipman, RF
    Morris, PW
    Beintema, DA
    Boxhoorn, DR
    Feuchtgruber, H
    Heras, AM
    Huygen, R
    Kester, DJM
    Lahuis, F
    Leech, K
    Lorente, R
    Lutz, D
    Roelfsema, PR
    Salama, A
    Schaeidt, SG
    Valentijn, EA
    Vandenbussche, B
    Wieprecht, E
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE CONFERENCE ON THE CALIBRATION LEGACY OF THE ISO MISSION, 2003, 481 : 107 - 111
  • [9] PRE- AND IN-FLIGHT GEOMETRIC CHARACTERIZATION AND CALIBRATION CONCEPTS FOR THE ENMAP MISSION
    Storch, Tobias
    Lenfert, Kai
    Schneider, Mathias
    Mogulski, Valery
    Bachmann, Martin
    Sang, Bernhard
    Mueller, Rupert
    Hofer, Stefan
    Chlebek, Christian
    [J]. 2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2012, : 5021 - 5024
  • [10] In-flight Geometric Calibration and Orientation of ALOS/PRISM Imagery with a Generic Sensor Model
    Radhadevi, P. V.
    Mueller, Rupert
    d'Angelo, Pablo
    Reinartz, Peter
    [J]. PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 2011, 77 (05): : 531 - 538