共 50 条
Clinical Outcomes and Survival Analysis of Remdesivir as a Treatment Option for Moderate to Severe COVID-19 Patients
被引:0
|作者:
Aboelsaad, Iman
[1
]
Ashmawy, Rasha
[1
,2
]
Mahrous, Doaa
[1
,2
]
Sharaf, Sandy
[1
,2
]
Aly, Shahinda
[1
,2
]
Abdullatif, Sara
[1
,3
]
Fakhry, Ayat
[2
]
Hassan, Basma
[2
]
Khamis, Dalia
[1
]
Aldakhs, Alaa
[4
]
Kamal, Ehab
[5
]
机构:
[1] Maamora Chest Hosp, MoHP, Dept Clin Res, Alexandria 21923, Egypt
[2] Maamora Chest Hosp, MoHP, Dept Clin Pharm, Alexandria 21923, Egypt
[3] Maamora Chest Hosp, MoHP, Dept Clin Pathol, Alexandria 21923, Egypt
[4] Maamora Chest Hosp, MoHP, Dept Chest Dis, Alexandria 21923, Egypt
[5] Natl Res Ctr, Med Res Div, Trop Med, Giza 12622, Egypt
来源:
关键词:
COVID-19;
Remdesivir;
antiviral treatment;
clinical outcome;
D O I:
10.3390/covid2120126
中图分类号:
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号:
1004 ;
120402 ;
摘要:
Background: Remdesivir is a broad-spectrum antiviral that has been approved as promising medicine worldwide for the fatal pandemic COVID-19 disease. There is a debate over its efficacy, with different studies taking into account a variety of factors. Therefore, we conducted this study to evaluate the primary composite outcome of mortality rate, need for mechanical ventilation (MV), and escalation of care among Remdesivir (RDV) and non-Remdesivir (NoRDV) groups. Methods: Patients with moderate and severe PCR-confirmed COVID-19 infection were observed retrospectively, before and after including RDV in the treatment protocol during the period from August 2020 to February 2021. Result: From the 509 hospitalized patients, 35% received Remdesivir, with 64% being severe patients. The median age in both groups was 59 years old, and there was no significant difference between the two groups regarding gender, baseline characteristics, and comorbidities. In contrast, the median hospital length of stay in the RDV group was lower (8 days) than the NoRDV (9 days), p = 0.004. The composite outcome was 17.7% in the RDV group and 22.2% in the NoRDV group, but the difference was statistically insignificant (p-value 0.289). Adjusted logistic regression demonstrated a non-significant lower association of the composite outcome with RDV use (OR 0.623, 95CI% 0.37-1.02), and a significant reduction occurred in patients <60 years old (OR 0.39, 95%CI 0.17-0.83). However, survival analysis for mortality, MV, and transfer to a higher level revealed insignificant differences in the median time between groups. Subgroup analyses showed that RDV utilization had a non-significant effect on the risk of all three outcomes across different groups. Conclusion: Despite controlling all patient characteristics, treatment with RDV did not improve patient outcomes over other antivirals and standard care. There is an urgent need for further studies to investigate and evaluate new therapeutic approaches or combinations.
引用
收藏
页码:1758 / 1767
页数:10
相关论文