Psychosocial outcomes after varying risk management strategies in women at increased familial breast cancer risk: a mixed methods study of patient and partner outcomes

被引:2
|
作者
Morgan, J. [1 ]
MacInnes, E. [2 ]
Erskine, S. [3 ]
Walters, S. J. [1 ]
Cook, J. [4 ]
Collins, K. [5 ]
Wyld, L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Leeds Teaching Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[3] East England Sch Gen Practice, Norwich, Norfolk, England
[4] Sheffield Childrens NHS Fdn Trust, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[5] Sheffield Hallam Univ, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
BRCA gene carriers; Risk-reducing surgery; Surveillance; Screening; Decision making Psychosocial outcomes; BILATERAL PROPHYLACTIC MASTECTOMY; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER COHORT; BRCA2 MUTATION CARRIERS; BODY-IMAGE; PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS; FOLLOW-UP; SCREENING WOMEN; HEREDITARY RISK; MAMMOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1308/rcsann.2023.0042
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Female carriers of BRCA1/2 genes have an increased lifetime risk of breast cancer. Options for managing risk include imaging surveillance or risk-reducing surgery (RRS). This mixed methods study aimed to identify factors affecting risk-management decisions and the psychosocial outcomes of these decisions for high-risk women and their partners. Methods Semi-structured qualitative interviews were performed with women at high breast cancer risk who had faced these choices. Partners were also interviewed. Analysis used a framework approach. A bespoke questionnaire was developed to quantify and explore associations. Results A total of 32 women were interviewed. Of these, 27 had partners of whom 7 (26%) agreed to be interviewed. Four main themes arose: perception of risk and impact of increased risk; risk-management strategy decision-making; impact of risk-management strategy; support needs and partner relationship issues. The questionnaire response rate was 36/157 (23%). Decision satisfaction was high in both surveillance and RRS groups. Relationship changes were common but not universal. Common causes of distress following RRS included adverse body image changes. Both groups experienced generalised and cancer-specific anxiety. Drivers for surgery included having children, deaths of close family from breast cancer and higher levels of cancer anxiety. Conclusions Levels of psychosocial and decision satisfaction were high for women choosing both RRS and surveillance but, for a minority, risk-reducing measures result in long-term psychosocial morbidity. Efforts to recognise women at increased risk of psychological morbidity may allow targeted support.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 91
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Outcomes of Multimodality Breast Screening for Women at Increased Risk of Familial Breast Cancer
    Ian C. Bennett
    Jennifer Muller
    Linda Cockburn
    Helen Joshua
    Gillian Thorley
    Christine Baker
    Nili Wood
    Jane Brazier
    Mark Jones
    Nathan Dunn
    Michael Gattas
    World Journal of Surgery, 2010, 34 : 979 - 986
  • [2] Outcomes of Multimodality Breast Screening for Women at Increased Risk of Familial Breast Cancer
    Bennett, Ian C.
    Muller, Jennifer
    Cockburn, Linda
    Joshua, Helen
    Thorley, Gillian
    Baker, Christine
    Wood, Nili
    Brazier, Jane
    Jones, Mark
    Dunn, Nathan
    Gattas, Michael
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 34 (05) : 979 - 986
  • [3] Outcomes of Multimodality Breast Screening for Women at Increased Risk of Familial Breast Cancer: Reply to Letter
    Ian C. Bennett
    World Journal of Surgery, 2010, 34 : 2788 - 2789
  • [4] Outcomes of Multimodality Breast Screening for Women at Increased Risk of Familial Breast Cancer: Reply to Letter
    Bennett, Ian C.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 34 (11) : 2788 - 2789
  • [5] Guidelines for the management of women at increased familial risk of breast cancer
    Sauven, P
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 40 (05) : 653 - 665
  • [6] Recreational Physical Activity and Outcomes After Breast Cancer in Women at High Familial Risk
    Kehm, Rebecca D.
    MacInnis, Robert J.
    John, Esther M.
    Liao, Yuyan
    Kurian, Allison W.
    Genkinger, Jeanine M.
    Knight, Julia A.
    Colonna, Sarah, V
    Chung, Wendy K.
    Milne, Roger
    Zeinomar, Nur
    Dite, Gillian S.
    Southey, Melissa C.
    Giles, Graham G.
    Mclachlan, Sue-Anne
    Whitaker, Kristen D.
    Friedlander, Michael L.
    Weideman, Prue C.
    Glendon, Gord
    Nesci, Stephanie
    Investigators, KConFab
    Phillips, Kelly-Anne
    Andrulis, Irene L.
    Buys, Saundra S.
    Daly, Mary B.
    Hopper, John L.
    Terry, Mary Beth
    JNCI CANCER SPECTRUM, 2021, 5 (06)
  • [7] Long-term outcomes of risk-reducing surgery in unaffected women at increased familial risk of breast and/or ovarian cancer
    Louise Heiniger
    Phyllis N. Butow
    Joseph Coll
    Tracey Bullen
    Judy Wilson
    Brandi Baylock
    Bettina Meiser
    Melanie A. Price
    Familial Cancer, 2015, 14 : 105 - 115
  • [8] Long-term outcomes of risk-reducing surgery in unaffected women at increased familial risk of breast and/or ovarian cancer
    Heiniger, Louise
    Butow, Phyllis N.
    Coll, Joseph
    Bullen, Tracey
    Wilson, Judy
    Baylock, Brandi
    Meiser, Bettina
    Price, Melanie A.
    FAMILIAL CANCER, 2015, 14 (01) : 105 - 115
  • [9] LONG-TERM OUTCOMES OF RISK-REDUCING SURGERY IN UNAFFECTED WOMEN AT INCREASED FAMILIAL RISK OF BREAST AND/OR OVARIAN CANCER
    Heiniger, Louise
    Butow, Phyllis N.
    Coll, Joseph
    Bullen, Tracey
    Wilson, Judy
    Baylock, Brandi
    Meiser, Bettina
    Price, Melanie
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 10 : 116 - 116
  • [10] Breast cancer risk reduction: Strategies for women at increased risk
    Chlebowski, RT
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF MEDICINE, 2002, 53 : 519 - 540