Review of the progress of geological research on coalbed methane co-production

被引:0
|
作者
Guo C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Qin Y. [4 ]
Yi T. [5 ]
Ma D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Shi Q. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bao Y. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chen Y. [1 ,2 ]
Qiao J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lu L. [6 ]
机构
[1] College of Geology and Environment, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an
[2] Shaanxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Geological Support for Coal Green Exploitation, Xi’an
[3] Geological Research Institute for Coal Green Mining, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an
[4] Key Laboratory of CBM Resources and Reservoir Formation Process, Ministry of Education, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou
[5] Guizhou Bureau of Coal Geological Exploration, Guiyang
[6] Aerophoto Grammetry and Remote Sensing Bureau, China National Administration of Coal Geology, Xi’an
关键词
CBM co-production; coal-measure gas; geological research progress; interference discrimination; produced-water; reservoir damage; stacked gas-bearing system;
D O I
10.12363/issn.1001-1986.21.10.0573
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Coalbed methane (CBM) co-production is an important way to improve the efficiency of CBM development in multi-seam areas, but the special nature of reservoir formation makes the co-mining method and production effect complex and variable, which presents challenges for efficient development. Experts in the field of CBM from China have carried out a lot of basic research and engineering practice on CBM reservoir formation and the feasibility of co-production in multiple seams, which have gained fruitful results, providing strong support for deepening the CBM geological theory and promoting industrial development. To provide reference for subsequent research, engineering implementation and industrial construction, this paper systematically analyzes and reviews the latest research progress in the field of CBM co-production geology in China from four aspects: reservoir formation theory of stacked CBM systems; co-production geological constraints; co-production feasibility identification method; and co-production reservoir damage. The main understandings can be summarized as follows. (1) The sequence gas control mechanism of the accumulation of the stacked CBM systems and the later modification effect of rock formation and ground stress are deepened. The hydro-geochemical closed index of coal-measure groundwater environment is constructed, which provides a new parameter to identify the stacked gas-bearing systems and hydrodynamic conditions, and three types of stacked geological patterns of gas-bearing systems (growth type, decay type and stable type) are identified by using fluid pressure profiles. The concept of stacked CBM system is further extended to the category of coal measure gas, and the theory and method system of “co-mining compatibility” of stacked gas-bearing systems based on coal-measure composite reservoirs is proposed and applied to the pilot demonstration project of coal-measure gas co-production, which has a chieved preliminary results. (2) The Carboniferous-Permian (Taiyuan-Shanxi Formation) in North China and Late Permian (Changxing-Longtan Formation) in Western Guizhou and Eastern Yunnan are the hotspot areas for CBM co-production research and engineering practice, and the fluid pressure system and permeability differences are the most concerned geological factors in co-production. The difference in hydrodynamic conditions and fluid supply capacity of Shanxi Formation and Taiyuan Formation is an important factor limiting the CBM co-production in North China. The maximum inter-seam span, cumulative thickness, coal body structure of the coal seam in co-production in Western Guizhou and Eastern Yunnan have received more attention, and interference from shallow groundwater is the key restricting the efficiency of CBM co-production in the Zhijin Block. (3) Productivity analysis, physical simulation, numerical simulation, and geochemical analysis of produced water are important methods to identify the feasibility and interference of CBM co-production. The basic idea, technical template and evaluation process for analyzing the produced water source and identifying the degree of fluid interference in the co-production wells based on the geochemistry of produced water, as well as the production layer contribution analysis method based on the peaking and identification of the gas-production curve, have been proposed. The continuous maturity and innovation of technical methods provide strong support for the optimization and efficiency improvement of CBM co-production engineering. (4) CBM co-production is more sensitive to geological conditions and engineering disturbances, and is prone to induce reservoir damage, involving Jamin effect and airlock damage induced by production layer exposure, as well as stress-sensitive and velocity-sensitive damage induced by the pressure system and permeability differences. Homogenized reservoir reconstruction, separated-pressure system development (separated-time or separated-space), and refined drainage design and control are effective ways to reduce reservoir damage. © 2022 Science Press.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 57
页数:15
相关论文
共 119 条
  • [1] QIN Yong, XIONG Menghui, YI Tongsheng, Et al., On unattached multiple superposed coalbed-methane system:In a case of the Shuigonghe syncline, Zhijin-Nayong coalfield,Guizhou[J], Geological Review, 54, 1, pp. 65-70, (2008)
  • [2] QIN Yong, SHEN Jian, SHEN Yulin, Joint mining compatibility of superposed gas-bearing systems: A general geological problem for extraction of three natural gases and deep CBM in coal series[J], Journal of China Coal Society, 41, 1, pp. 14-23, (2016)
  • [3] MENG Zhaoping, LIU Cuili, JI Yiming, Geological conditions of coalbed methane and shale gas exploitation and their comparison analysis[J], Journal of China Coal Society, 38, 5, pp. 728-736, (2013)
  • [4] CAO Daiyong, YAO Zheng, Jing LI, Evaluation status and development trend of unconventional gas in coal measure[J], Coal Science and Technology, 42, 1, pp. 89-92, (2014)
  • [5] FU Xuehai, JIANATAYI D, ZHU Yanming, Et al., Resources characteristics and separated reservoirs drainage of unconventional gas in coal measures[J], Earth Science Frontiers, 23, 3, pp. 36-40, (2016)
  • [6] LIANG Bing, SHI Yingshuang, SUN Weiji, Et al., Reservoir forming characteristics of “the three gases” in coal measure and the possibility of commingling in China[J], Journal of China Coal Society, 41, 1, pp. 167-173, (2016)
  • [7] ZOU Caineng, YANG Zhi, HUANG Shipeng, Et al., Resource types, formation, distribution and prospects of coal-measure gas[J], Petroleum Exploration and Development, 46, 3, pp. 451-462, (2019)
  • [8] NI Xiaoming, SU Xianbo, LI Guangsheng, Feasibility of multi–layer drainage for No.3 and No.15 coal seams in the Fanzhuang area[J], Natural Gas Geoscience, 21, 1, pp. 144-149, (2010)
  • [9] LI Guobiao, LI Guofu, Study on the differences and main controlling factors of the coalbed methane wells between single layer and multi-layer drainage[J], Journal of China Coal Society, 37, 8, pp. 1354-1358, (2012)
  • [10] WANG Wanhong, ZHENG Yuzhu, Combination of gas-producing layers of CBM wells in Wubu mining area[J], Coal Geology & Exploration, 40, 5, pp. 31-33, (2012)