A systematic review of machine learning models for management, prediction and classification of ARDS

被引:0
|
作者
Tran, Tu K. [2 ,3 ]
Tran, Minh C. [1 ]
Joseph, Arun [1 ]
Phan, Phi A. [1 ]
Grau, Vicente [2 ]
Farmery, Andrew D. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Div Anaesthet, Oxford, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Dept Engn & Sci, Oxford, England
[3] Univ Oxford, Oxford Inst Biomed Engn, Nuffield Dept Clin Neurosci, Oxford, England
关键词
AI; ARDS; Explainable AI; RESPIRATORY-DISTRESS-SYNDROME; VALIDATION; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1186/s12931-024-02834-x
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Aim Acute respiratory distress syndrome or ARDS is an acute, severe form of respiratory failure characterised by poor oxygenation and bilateral pulmonary infiltrates. Advancements in signal processing and machine learning have led to promising solutions for classification, event detection and predictive models in the management of ARDS.Method In this review, we provide systematic description of different studies in the application of Machine Learning (ML) and artificial intelligence for management, prediction, and classification of ARDS. We searched the following databases: Google Scholar, PubMed, and EBSCO from 2009 to 2023. A total of 243 studies was screened, in which, 52 studies were included for review and analysis. We integrated knowledge of previous work providing the state of art and overview of explainable decision models in machine learning and have identified areas for future research.Results Gradient boosting is the most common and successful method utilised in 12 (23.1%) of the studies. Due to limitation of data size available, neural network and its variation is used by only 8 (15.4%) studies. Whilst all studies used cross validating technique or separated database for validation, only 1 study validated the model with clinician input. Explainability methods were presented in 15 (28.8%) of studies with the most common method is feature importance which used 14 times.Conclusion For databases of 5000 or fewer samples, extreme gradient boosting has the highest probability of success. A large, multi-region, multi centre database is required to reduce bias and take advantage of neural network method. A framework for validating with and explaining ML model to clinicians involved in the management of ARDS would be very helpful for development and deployment of the ML model.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluating machine learning models for sepsis prediction: A systematic review of methodologies
    Deng, Hong-Fei
    Sun, Ming-Wei
    Wang, Yu
    Zeng, Jun
    Yuan, Ting
    Li, Ting
    Li, Di-Huan
    Chen, Wei
    Zhou, Ping
    Wang, Qi
    Jiang, Hua
    [J]. ISCIENCE, 2022, 25 (01)
  • [2] Opportunities and challenges of machine learning models for prediction and diagnosis of spondylolisthesis: A systematic review
    Saravagi, Deepika
    Agrawal, Shweta
    Saravagi, Manisha
    [J]. International Journal of Engineering Systems Modelling and Simulation, 2021, 12 (2-3): : 127 - 138
  • [3] Machine learning prediction models in orthopedic surgery: A systematic review in transparent reporting
    Groot, Olivier Q.
    Ogink, Paul T.
    Lans, Amanda
    Twining, Peter K.
    Kapoor, Neal D.
    DiGiovanni, William
    Bindels, Bas J. J.
    Bongers, Michiel E. R.
    Oosterhoff, Jacobien H. F.
    Karhade, Aditya, V
    Oner, F. C.
    Verlaan, Jorrit-Jan
    Schwab, Joseph H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2022, 40 (02) : 475 - 483
  • [4] Suicidal behaviour prediction models using machine learning techniques: A systematic review
    Nordin, Noratikah
    Zainol, Zurinahni
    Noor, Mohd Halim Mohd
    Chan, Lai Fong
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE, 2022, 132
  • [5] Opportunities and challenges of machine learning models for prediction and diagnosis of spondylolisthesis: a systematic review
    Saravagi, Deepika
    Agrawal, Shweta
    Saravagi, Manisha
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SYSTEMS MODELLING AND SIMULATION, 2021, 12 (2-3) : 127 - 138
  • [6] Exploring Machine Learning Models for Soil Nutrient Properties Prediction: A Systematic Review
    Folorunso, Olusegun
    Ojo, Oluwafolake
    Busari, Mutiu
    Adebayo, Muftau
    Joshua, Adejumobi
    Folorunso, Daniel
    Ugwunna, Charles Okechukwu
    Olabanjo, Olufemi
    Olabanjo, Olusola
    [J]. BIG DATA AND COGNITIVE COMPUTING, 2023, 7 (02)
  • [7] Social Determinants in Machine Learning Cardiovascular Disease Prediction Models: A Systematic Review
    Zhao, Yuan
    Wood, Erica P.
    Mirin, Nicholas
    Cook, Stephanie H.
    Chunara, Rumi
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 61 (04) : 596 - 605
  • [8] Machine Learning for Hypertension Prediction: a Systematic Review
    Gabriel F. S. Silva
    Thales P. Fagundes
    Bruno C. Teixeira
    Alexandre D. P. Chiavegatto Filho
    [J]. Current Hypertension Reports, 2022, 24 : 523 - 533
  • [9] Machine Learning for Hypertension Prediction: a Systematic Review
    Silva, Gabriel F. S.
    Fagundes, Thales P.
    Teixeira, Bruno C.
    Chiavegatto Filho, Alexandre D. P.
    [J]. CURRENT HYPERTENSION REPORTS, 2022, 24 (11) : 523 - 533
  • [10] Analysis of machine learning and deep learning prediction models for sepsis and neonatal sepsis: A systematic review
    Parvin, A. Safiya
    Saleena, B.
    [J]. ICT EXPRESS, 2023, 9 (06): : 1215 - 1225