Comparing the outcomes and costs of cardiac monitoring with implantable loop recorders and mobile cardiac outpatient telemetry following stroke using real-world evidence

被引:1
|
作者
Norlock, Vincent [1 ]
Vazquez, Reynaldo [2 ]
Dunn, Alexandria [2 ]
Siegfried, Christian [3 ]
Wadhwa, Manish [2 ]
Medic, Goran [4 ]
机构
[1] Philips, Rosemont, IL 60018 USA
[2] Philips, San Diego, CA 92130 USA
[3] Veranex Solut, Raleigh, NC 27607 USA
[4] Philips, Eindhoven, Netherlands
关键词
costs; cryptogenic stroke; healthcare costs; health economics; ICM; ILR; implantable loop recorder; ischemic stroke; MCOT; MCT; mobile cardiac outpatient telemetry; mortality; readmissions; real-world; evidence; stroke; ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION; COMORBIDITY MEASURES; PROPENSITY SCORE; ISCHEMIC-STROKE; ALGORITHMS; DIAGNOSIS; MODELS;
D O I
10.57264/cer-2024-0008
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aim: Patients with ischemic stroke (IS) commonly undergo monitoring to identify atrial fibrillation with mobile cardiac outpatient telemetry (MCOT) or implantable loop recorders (ILRs). The authors compared readmission, healthcare cost and survival in patients monitored post-stroke with either MCOT or ILR. Materials & methods: The authors used claims data from Optum's de-identified Clinformatics R Data Mart Database to identify patients with IS hospitalized from January 2017 to December 2020 who were prescribed ambulatory cardiac monitoring via MCOT or ILR. They compared the costs associated with the initial inpatient visit as well as the rate and causes of readmission, survival and healthcare costs over the following 18 months. Datasets were balanced using patient baseline and hospitalization characteristics. Multivariable generalized linear gamma regression was used for cost comparisons. Cox proportional hazard regression was used for survival and readmission analysis. Sub-cohorts were analyzed based on the severity of the index IS. Results: In 2244 patients, readmissions were significantly lower in the MCOT monitored group (30.2%) compared with the ILR group (35.4%) (hazard ratio [HR] 1.23; 95% CI: 1.04- 1.46). Average cost over 18 months starting with the index IS was $27,429 (USD) lower in the MCOT group (95% CI: $22,353-$32,633). Survival difference bordered on statistical significance and trended to lower mortality in MCOT (8.9%) versus ILR (11.3%) (HR 1.30; 95% CI: 1:00-1.69), led by significance in patients with complications or comorbidities with the index event (MCOT 7.5%, ILR 11.5%; HR 1.62; 95% CI: 1.11- 2.36). Conclusion: The use of MCOT versus ILR as the primary monitor following IS was associated with significant decreases in readmission, lower costs for the initial IS and total care over the next 18 months, significantly lower mortality for patients with complications and comorbidities at the index stroke, and a trend toward improved survival across all patients.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] REHOSPITALIZATION OCCURRENCES, DURATION, AND COSTS IN PATIENTS MONITORED WITH IMPLANTABLE LOOP RECORDERS OR MOBILE CARDIAC OUTPATIENT TELEMETRY POST-STROKE
    Vazquez, R.
    Dunn, A.
    Wadhwa, M.
    Medic, G.
    Norlock, V.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2024, 27 (12)
  • [2] IMPLANTABLE LOOP RECORDERS IN CRYPTOGENIC STROKE: A REAL-WORLD EXPERIENCE
    Scopelliti, G.
    Bertora, P.
    Cova, I.
    Mele, F.
    Rosa, S.
    Viecca, M.
    Forleo, G.
    Pantoni, L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2020, 15 (1_SUPPL) : 548 - 548
  • [3] Costs and outcomes of mobile cardiac outpatient telemetry monitoring post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement
    Mohr, Belinda A.
    Wadhwa, Manish
    Medic, Goran
    Lavelle, Jennifer
    Buchenberger, J. Daniel
    Norlock, Vincent
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2022, 11 (14) : 1045 - 1055
  • [4] The diagnosis of cardiac arrhythmias: A prospective multi-center randomized study comparing mobile cardiac outpatient telemetry versus standard loop event monitoring
    Rothman, Steven A.
    Laughlin, James C.
    Seltzer, Jonathan
    Walia, Jasjit S.
    Baman, Rakesh I.
    Siouffi, Samer Y.
    Sangrigoli, Robert M.
    Kowey, Peter R.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 18 (03) : 241 - 247
  • [5] Mobile Cardiac Outpatient Telemetry Patch vs Implantable Loop Recorder in Cryptogenic Stroke Patients in the US - Cost-Minimization Model
    Medic, Goran
    Kotsopoulos, Nikos
    Connolly, Mark P.
    Lavelle, Jennifer
    Norlock, Vincent
    Wadhwa, Manish
    Mohr, Belinda A.
    Derkac, Wayne M.
    MEDICAL DEVICES-EVIDENCE AND RESEARCH, 2021, 14 : 445 - 458
  • [6] SHOULD MOBILE TELEMETRY MONITORING OR IMPLANTABLE LOOP RECORDERS BE UTILIZED FOR EARLY DETECTION OF SILENT ATRIAL ARRHYTHMIAS IN PATIENTS WITH CRYPTOGENIC STROKE?
    Krathen, Jonathan
    Tan, Jian Liang
    Essilfie, Gilbert
    Ortman, Matthew
    Andriulli, John
    Russo, Andrea
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 77 (18) : 415 - 415
  • [7] High Rate of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source: Success Using Implantable Loop Recorders for Prolonged Cardiac Monitoring
    Muller, C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2022, 17 (2_SUPPL) : 29 - 29
  • [8] RISK FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH ATRIAL FIBRILLATION DETECTION BY MOBILE CARDIAC OUTPATIENT TELEMETRY FOLLOWING ACUTE ISCHEMIC STROKE
    Inamullah, O.
    Mcconnell, A.
    Al-Khalidi, H.
    Coyne, B.
    Bloomfield, G.
    Shah, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2020, 15 (1_SUPPL) : 552 - 553
  • [9] Cryptogenic stroke and asymptomatic atrial fibrillation in a real-world population: an implantable cardiac monitor study
    Faustino, Massimiliano
    Di Stefano, Vincenzo
    Franciotti, Raffaella
    Furia, Nanda
    Di Girolamo, Enrico
    Bonanni, Laura
    Onofrj, Marco
    De Angelis, Maria Vittoria
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL SUPPLEMENTS, 2019, 21 (0J) : J13 - J13
  • [10] Detection of malignant cardiac arrhythmias: A prospective multi-center randomized study comparing mobile cardiac outpatient telemetry versus standard loop event monitor
    Rothman, Steven
    Seltzer, Jonathon
    McNamara, Anna
    Kowey, Peter R.
    CIRCULATION, 2006, 114 (18) : 563 - 563