Capability-effectiveness evaluation of contribution ratio to system-of- systems based on QFD and combination weights TOPSIS

被引：2
|
作者：
Lin M. [1 ,2 ]
Li X. [1 ]
Wang Y. [1 ]
Zhu Y. [1 ]
机构：
[1] College of Systems Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha
[2] Unit 92941 of the PLA, Huludao
来源：
Xi Tong Gong Cheng Yu Dian Zi Ji Shu/Systems Engineering and Electronics | 2019年 / 41卷 / 08期
关键词：
Contribution ratio to system-of-systems (CRSoS); Equipment; Quality function deployment (QFD); System-of-systems (SoS); Technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS);
D O I：
10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2019.08.18
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
The contribution ratio to system-of-systems (CRSoS) of weapon equipment refers to the mea-surement of a single equipment contribution to the overall performance (such as capability or effectiveness) of system-of-systems (SoS), consistenting with the overall goal and rules of the SoS in a weapon equipment SoS or operation SoS. Firstly, a synthesized capability-effectiveness evaluation framework is proposed and a hierarchical evaluation methods of CRSoS is given based on the framework. Secondly, capacity/efficiency data of the simulation experiments is filled to requirements-metrics matrix by a relational-oriented systems engineering method using quantitative quality function deployment matrix. Thirdly, a combination weights vector according to the sensitivity and fitness of the measurement on demand is proposed. Finally, technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution is introduced to rank the SoS solutions. A joint fire mission using an unmanned swarm is introduced to illustrate the feasibility of this approach. © 2019, Editorial Office of Systems Engineering and Electronics. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：1802 / 1809
页数：7
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Defense Acquisition Guidebook, (2006)
  • [2] Hause M.C., SOS for SoS: a new paradigm for system of systems modeling, Proc.of the IEEE Aerospace Conference, (2014)
  • [3] Beach T., Dryer D., Sanchez S., Et al., Team 6: application of design of experiments & data farming techniques for planning tests in a joint mission environment, From Scythe Proceedings & Bulletin of the International Data Farming Community Issue Workshop, (2009)
  • [4] Holt J., Perry S., Brownsword M., Et al., Model-based requirements engineering for system of systems, Proc.of the International Conference on System of Systems Engineering, (2013)
  • [5] Holt J., Perry S., Payne R., Et al., A model-based approach for requirements engineering for systems of systems, IEEE Systems Journal, 9, 1, pp. 252-262, (2015)
  • [6] Deitz P.H., Bray B.E., Michaelis J.R., The missions and means framework as an ontology, Proc.of the SPIE, Ground/Air Multisensor Interoperability, Integration, and Networking for Persistent ISR VII, (2016)
  • [7] Luo X.M., Yang J., He R., Research and demonstration on contribution evaluation of weapon equipment system based on task-capability-structare-evolution, Journal of Equipment Academy, 27, 3, pp. 7-13, (2016)
  • [8] Chen X.W., Xie M.L., Zhang J.Q., Analysis on the contribution mechanism of new equipment system to the warfighting system, Journal of Equipment Academy, 27, 6, pp. 26-30, (2016)
  • [9] Guan Q.B., Yu X.H., Research on evaluation of equipment's contribution to system warfighting, Journal of Equipment Academy, 26, 3, pp. 1-5, (2015)
  • [10] Wang F., Si G.Y., Analysis and measurement method of weapon equipment system capability contribution degree, Military Operations Research and Systems Engineering, 30, 3, pp. 10-15, (2016)
123