Evaluating Building Sustainability Rating Systems: Standards and Methodologies for Energy-Water Based Assessment Criteria

被引:0
|
作者
Mohammed, Yousif [1 ,2 ]
Hayder, Gasim [3 ]
Thiruchelvam, Sivadass [3 ]
Aziz, Hamidi Abdul [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tenaga Nas, Coll Grad Studies, Kajang 43000, Selangor Darul, Malaysia
[2] Univ Tenaga Nas, Inst Energy Infrastruct IEI, Kajang 43000, Selangor Darul, Malaysia
[3] Univ Tenaga Nas, Coll Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Kajang 43000, Selangor, Malaysia
[4] Univ Sains Malaysia, Sch Civil Engn, Engn Campus, Nibong 14300, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
[5] Univ Sains Malaysia, Waste Management Cluster, Engn Campus, Nibong Tebal 14300, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
关键词
Energy water assessment; Green building; Sustainability; Environmental assessment; Rating system; EFFICIENCY; INDICATOR; TOOLS;
D O I
10.1007/s11269-024-03890-0
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
To implement the principle of sustainable development worldwide, multiple sustainability criteria are utilized. The challenges that significantly impact quality of life and the environment are largely influenced by residential and service buildings, which rely heavily on energy and water demands, as well as the strategies and smart systems used for their optimization. This study aims to investigate the relationship between energy and water usage based on various building assessment standards. The research question explored is how extensively the Global Sustainability Systems approach energy-water assessments. The objectives of the study were to examine the weight and density valuations of six (6) notable global sustainable systems. The various stages of the study include defining the research question, categorizing the data, analyzing the data to generate reportable metrics, and providing an in-depth discussion of the findings. The findings of the study illustrate the strong influence of energy, with a maximum allocation of 55% for the Green Mark (GM) assessment. GM also recorded the highest allocation for the issue of Energy Optimization, at 22%. On the other hand, the maximum allocation for the Water category is 10% in both the Green Star (GS) and Green Building Index systems. Furthermore, GS has the highest allocation for the issue of Water Reduction, at 9%. When considering all the reviewed systems, GM demonstrates the highest share for assessment issue distribution and the highest assessment correlation with the other systems - with a significance of 0.999 at p < 0.01 with Pearson correlation. Further critical evaluation of new assessment methodologies launched by, for instance, GS and GM, was considered a limitation of the research and is recommended for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:4823 / 4850
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multi-criteria sustainability assessment of water desalination and energy systems - Kuwait case
    Afgan, Naim Hamdia
    Darwish, Mohammed
    [J]. DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2011, 25 (1-3) : 241 - 250
  • [2] Insights on Green Building Rating Systems for Housing in India and Their Assessment with Pillars of Sustainability
    Piparsania, Kratika
    Kalita, Pratul
    [J]. WITH DESIGN: REINVENTING DESIGN MODES, IASDR 2021, 2022, : 2464 - 2484
  • [3] Energy-water nexus analysis of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in China based on statistical methodologies
    Xu, Jin
    Luo, Pengzhou
    Lu, Bowen
    Wang, Hongtao
    Wang, Xin
    Wu, Jiang
    Yan, Jinyue
    [J]. CLEANER ENERGY FOR CLEANER CITIES, 2018, 152 : 259 - 264
  • [4] Water Efficiency and Management in Sustainable Building Rating Systems: Examining Variation in Criteria Usage
    Al-Qawasmi, Jamal
    Asif, Muhammad
    Abd El Fattah, Ahmed
    Babsail, Mohammad O.
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (08)
  • [5] A multi-criteria lifecycle assessment framework for evaluating building systems design
    BuHamdan, Samer
    Alwisy, Aladdin
    Barkokebas, Beda
    Bouferguene, Ahmed
    Al-Hussein, Mohamed
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2019, 23 : 388 - 402
  • [6] The Dialogue between Structural Interventions and Sustainability Criteria in Rating Systems for Cultural Heritage: The Experience of GBC Historic Building
    Bertagni, Stefano
    Boarin, Paola
    Zuppiroli, Marco
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE, 2020, 14 (01) : 139 - 161
  • [7] Comparison of two hybrid renewable energy systems for a residential building based on sustainability assessment and emergy analysis
    Deymi-Dashtebayaz, Mahdi
    Nikitin, Andrey
    Norani, Marziye
    Nikitina, Veronika
    Hekmatshoar, Maziyar
    Shein, Vladislav
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 379
  • [8] A review of renewable energy assessment methods in green building and green neighborhood rating systems
    Zhang, Chong
    Cui, Chengliao
    Zhang, Ying
    Yuan, Jiaqi
    Luo, Yimo
    Gang, Wenjie
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2019, 195 (68-81) : 68 - 81
  • [9] Integrated life cycle sustainability assessment with future energy mix: A review of methodologies for evaluating the sustainability of multiple power generation technologies development
    Hemmati, Mohammad
    Bayati, Navid
    Ebel, Thomas
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY FOCUS, 2024, 49
  • [10] Criteria-based ranking of green building design factors according to leading rating systems
    Alwisy, Aladdin
    BuHamdan, Samer
    Gul, Mustafa
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2018, 178 : 347 - 359