The impact of assisted reproductive technology treatments on maternal and offspring outcomes in singleton pregnancies: a review of systematic reviews

被引:4
|
作者
Melville, Joanna [1 ]
Stringer, Aisling [1 ]
Black, Naomi [1 ,2 ]
Quenby, Siobhan [1 ,2 ]
Keay, Stephen D. [2 ]
David, Anna L. [3 ,4 ]
Yasmin, Ephia [3 ,4 ]
Al Wattar, Bassel H. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Warwick Med Sch, Life Sci Bldg, Coventry CV4 7HL, England
[2] Univ Hosp Coventry & Warwickshire, Ctr Reprod Med, Coventry, England
[3] UCL, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Inst Womens Hlth, London, England
[4] Univ Coll London Hosp, Reprod Med Unit, London, England
来源
F&S REVIEWS | 2021年 / 2卷 / 04期
关键词
Invitro fertilization; pregnancy; assisted conception; offspring; systematic review; VITRO FERTILIZATION TREATMENT; FUTURE INFERTILITY RESEARCH; JAPAN JAPAN SOCIETY; PERINATAL OUTCOMES; OBSTETRICAL PRACTICE; GYNECOLOGY [!text type='JS']JS[!/text]OG; CLEAVAGE-STAGE; ANTENATAL CARE; GUIDELINES; PRECONCEPTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.xfnr.2021.09.003
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: Assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatments are commonly used to aid conception in subfertile couples. This study aimed to evaluate the risks of adverse maternal and offspring outcomes in singleton pregnancy conceived with different ART treatments and techniques. Evidence Review: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and HTA until December 2020 for all systematic reviews evaluating adverse outcomes in pregnancies conceived with various ART techniques, autologous or donor gametes, and embryo development stages. We assessed review quality using the AMSTAR 2 tool risk ratio (RR) or odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from the top quality reviews for each of the outcomes of interest across the identified ART treatments and population subgroups. Results: We included 24 systematic reviews, which mostly reported on observational studies. Compared with spontaneous conception, ART pregnancies had a higher risk of placenta previa (RR, 3.71; 95% CI, 2.67-5.16), antepartum hemorrhage (RR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.86-2.38), preterm birth (PTB) (RR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.59-1.83), very preterm birth (RR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.73-2.59), small for gestational age (SGA) (RR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.20-1.52), low birth weight (LBW) (RR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.49-1.75), and very low birth weight (VLBW) (RR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.84-2.43). Frozen vs. fresh embryo transfer was associated with a lower risk of PTB (RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.84-0.97), SGA (RR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.56-0.67), LBW (RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.67-0.77), and VLBW (RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.69-0.82). Embryo transfer at blastocyst vs. cleavage showed a higher risk of PTB (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.01-1.20) and large for gestational age (RR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.03-1.21) with a lower risk of SGA (RR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.76-0.92). Using donor vs. autologous oocytes increased the odds of PTB (OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.33-1.86), LBW (OR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.10-3.41), and VLBW (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.22-1.54) as well as maternal complications, including postpartum hemorrhage (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.20-3.20), gestational diabetes (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.03-1.56), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (OR, 2.63; 95% CI, 2.17-3.18), and cesarean section (OR, 2.28; 95% CI, 2.14-2.42). Conclusions: Assisted reproductive technology treatments are associated with increased risks of adverse maternal and offspring outcomes, especially with donor oocytes. The characteristics of ART treatment should be incorporated into prenatal care planning to mitigate those risks. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42020182612, registered March 9, 2020. (c) 2021 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)
引用
收藏
页码:287 / 301
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Maternal and perinatal outcomes in primiparous singleton pregnancies conceived with assisted reproductive technology in British Columbia
    Eckler, Rebecca
    Liu, Yang Doris
    Pooni, Amrita
    Yong, Paul J.
    Lisonkova, Sarka
    Bedaiwy, Mohamed A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2023, 291 : 106 - 111
  • [2] Impact of paternal age on assisted reproductive technology outcomes and offspring health: a systematic review
    Gourinat, Annabelle
    Mazeaud, Charles
    Hubert, Jacques
    Eschwege, Pascal
    Koscinski, Isabelle
    [J]. ANDROLOGY, 2023, 11 (06) : 973 - 986
  • [3] Maternal and perinatal outcomes in assisted reproductive technology (ART) singleton and twin pregnancies stratified by increasing maternal age.
    Chinea, E.
    Hernandez, J.
    Sanabria, V.
    Gonzalez, L.
    Martin-Casanas, F.
    Palumbo, A.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2007, 88 : S112 - S113
  • [4] Assisted reproductive technology, risk of gestational diabetes, and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies
    Bianchi, Cristina
    Brocchi, Alex
    Baronti, Walter
    Nicoli, Francesca
    Citro, Fabrizia
    Aragona, Michele
    Cela, Vito
    Del Prato, Stefano
    Bertolotto, Alessandra
    [J]. DIABETES-METABOLISM RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2023, 39 (05)
  • [5] Pregnancy outcomes in very advanced maternal age pregnancies: the impact of assisted reproductive technology
    Jackson, Sherri
    Hong, Connie
    Wang, Erica T.
    Alexander, Carolyn
    Gregory, Kimberly D.
    Pisarska, Margareta D.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2015, 103 (01) : 76 - 80
  • [6] Are singleton assisted reproductive technology pregnancies at risk of prematurity?
    Perri, T
    Chen, R
    Yoeli, R
    Merlob, P
    Orvieto, R
    Shalev, Y
    Ben-Rafael, Z
    Bar-Hava, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2001, 18 (05) : 245 - 249
  • [7] The Impact of Bariatric Surgery on Assisted Reproductive Technology Outcomes: A Systematic Review
    Alibhai, Kameela Miriam
    Churchill, Isabella F.
    Vause, Tannys
    Lochnan, Heather Anne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2022, 44 (08) : 915 - 923
  • [8] Effect of advanced maternal age on maternal and neonatal outcomes in assisted reproductive technology pregnancies
    Moaddab, Amirhossein
    Chervenak, Frank A.
    Mccullough, Laurence B.
    Sangi-Haghpeykar, Haleh
    Shamshirsaz, Amir A.
    Schutt, Amy
    Arian, Sara E.
    Fox, Karin A.
    Dildy, Gary A.
    Shamshirsaz, Alireza A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2017, 216 : 178 - 183
  • [9] Clinical Assisted Reproduction: Are Singleton Assisted Reproductive Technology Pregnancies at Risk of Prematurity?
    T. Perri
    R. Chen
    R. Yoeli
    P. Merlob
    R. Orvieto
    Y. Shalev
    Z. Ben-Rafael
    I. Bar-Hava
    [J]. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2001, 18 : 245 - 249
  • [10] Is there a relationship between assisted reproductive technology and maternal outcomes? A systematic review of cohort studies
    Heshmatnia, Fatemeh
    Jafari, Maryam
    Bozorgian, Leila
    Yadollahi, Parvin
    Khalajinia, Zohre
    Azizi, Marzieh
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE, 2023, 21 (11) : 861 - 880