Comparison of BlockBuster laryngeal mask with Air-Q intubating laryngeal airway as a conduit for fiber-optic guided intubation in children: A prospective randomized controlled study

被引:0
|
作者
Soni, Lipika [1 ]
Kumar, Kanil Ranjith [1 ]
Sinha, Renu [1 ]
Ayub, Arshad [1 ]
Patel, Nishant [1 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Anaesthesiol Pain Med & Crit Care, New Delhi, India
关键词
AGE; child; Airway; EQUIPMENT; airway devices; TRACHEAL INTUBATION; DIFFICULT AIRWAY; MANAGEMENT; INFANTS; LMA;
D O I
10.1111/pan.14906
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe pediatric sizes of BlockBuster supraglottic airway (SGA) have been introduced recently. Its efficacy as a conduit for endotracheal intubation in children has not been assessed. Newer devices are often compared with Air-Q SGA to assess their intubating capability. AimsThe primary objective was to compare the time taken for fiber-optic-guided intubation through the BlockBuster and the Air-Q SGAs. MethodsSixty children aged 6 months to 12 years with normal airways were randomized into two groups: Air-Q SGA (Group A) and Blockbuster SGA (Group B). After administration of general anesthesia, an appropriately sized SGA was inserted. The time taken for fiber-optic-guided intubation through the SGA, success, ease, and time for SGA insertion and removal were noted. The glottic view was graded by fiber-optic bronchoscopy. ResultsDemographic parameters were comparable. The time to intubate with the BlockBuster 62.40 +/- 17.2 s was comparable to the Air-Q 60.8 +/- 18.5 s (mean difference 1.6 s, 95% CI -7.65 to10.85; p = .73). The average time for SGA insertion in BlockBuster and Air-Q was 14.57 +/- 3.2 s and 16.67 +/- 5.39 s, respectively (mean difference -2.1, 95% CI -4.39 to 0.19 s; p = .07). The first-attempt intubation success and overall intubation success rates were comparable in both groups, 96.7% and 100%, respectively. In Group B, 25/3/1/1/0 cases had a glottic view grade of 1/2/3/4/5, respectively. In Group A, 23/3/2/2/0 cases had grade of 1/2/3/4/5 glottic views respectively. The average time to SGA removal was comparable between the BlockBuster (20.17 +/- 5.8 s) and the Air-Q (22.5 +/- 12.8 s) groups (mean difference -2.3 s, 95% CI -7.5 to 2.82 s; p = .37). None of the children had any perioperative complications. ConclusionBlockBuster SGA may be a useful alternative to Air-Q for SGA-assisted, fiber-optic-guided tracheal intubation in children.
引用
收藏
页码:671 / 677
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative study between Air-Q and Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway when used as conduit for fiber-optic
    Abdel-Halim, Talaat M.
    El Enin, Mostafa A. Abo
    Elgoushi, Mohsen M.
    Afifi, Mohammed G.
    Atwa, Hesham S.
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2014, 30 (02) : 107 - 113
  • [2] A randomized crossover comparison between the Laryngeal Mask Airway-Unique™ and the air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway in children*
    Jagannathan, Narasimhan
    Sohn, Lisa E.
    Mankoo, Ravinder
    Langen, Kenneth E.
    Mandler, Tessa
    PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2012, 22 (02) : 161 - 167
  • [3] Air-Q intubating laryngeal airway guided intubation in Morquio syndrome
    Mohammed, Sadik
    Gupta, Sunit Kumar
    Bhatia, Pradeep Kumar
    Chhabra, Swati
    Sethi, Priyanka
    Chouhan, Ravindra Singh
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 62 (06) : 473 - 474
  • [4] A randomized comparison the of the air-Q (R) intubating laryngeal airway and Ambu (R) AuraGain (TM) laryngeal mask for controlled ventilation in children
    Said, Nirawanti Mohamad
    Zaini, Rhendra Hardy Mohamad
    Hassan, Wan Mohd Nazaruddin Wan
    Iberahim, Mohamad Ibariyah
    Chong, Soon Eu
    ANAESTHESIA PAIN & INTENSIVE CARE, 2018, 22 (04) : 444 - 451
  • [5] Comparison of the air-Q intubating laryngeal airway and the cobra perilaryngeal airway as conduits for fiber optic-guided intubation in pediatric patients
    Girgis, Karim K.
    Youssef, Maha M. I.
    ElZayyat, Nashwa S.
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2014, 8 (04) : 470 - 476
  • [6] Comparison of the Air-Q intubating laryngeal mask airway and the Ambu AuraGain laryngeal mask airway as a conduit for fibreoptic assisted endotracheal intubation for simulated cervical spine injury
    Omar, Sanihah Che
    Zaini, Rhendra Hardy Mohamad
    Wong, Teck Fui
    Hassan, W. Mohd Nazaruddin W.
    ANAESTHESIOLOGY INTENSIVE THERAPY, 2021, 53 (03) : 241 - 245
  • [7] A study to evaluate and compare intubating laryngeal mask airway and air-Q intubating laryngeal airway for intubation using Parker Flex Tip tube
    Bansal, Teena
    Singhal, Suresh
    Mittal, Himani
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2020, 64 (02) : 97 - 102
  • [8] Comparison of blind tracheal intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask airway (LMA Fastrach™) and the Air-Q™
    Karim, Y. M.
    Swanson, D. E.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 66 (03) : 185 - 190
  • [9] Comparison of performance and efficacy of air-Q intubating laryngeal airway and flexible laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized and paralyzed infants and children
    Darlong, Vanlal
    Biyani, Ghansham
    Pandey, Ravindra
    Baidya, Dalim K.
    Chandralekha
    Punj, Jyotsna
    PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2014, 24 (10) : 1066 - 1071
  • [10] Evaluation of Ambu-Aura-i laryngeal mask as a conduit for endotracheal intubation. A comparison with Air-Q intubating laryngeal airway in adult surgical patients
    Soaida, Sherif M.
    Osman, Safinaz H.
    Ahmed, Abeer
    Saad, Dalia
    Selim, Mohamed A.
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2023, 39 (01): : 356 - 361