SoK: quantum computing methods for machine learning optimization

被引:2
|
作者
Baniata, Hamza [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Szeged, Dept Software Engn, Szeged, Hungary
关键词
Hyperparameter optimization; Neural architecture search; Quantum architecture search; Machine learning; Quantum computing; SEARCH;
D O I
10.1007/s42484-024-00180-1
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Hyperparameter optimization (HPO) and neural architecture search (NAS) of machine learning (ML) models are in the core implementation steps of AI-enabled systems. With multi-objective and multi-level optimization of complex ML models, it is agreed-on that HPO and NAS are NP-hard problems. That is, the size of the search space grows exponentially with the number of hyperparameters, possible architecture elements, and configurations. In 2017, the first proposal of QC-enabled HPO and NAS optimization was proposed. Simultaneously, advancements related to quantum neural networks (QNNs) resulted in more powerful ML due to their deployment on QC infrastructure. For such, quantum architecture search (QAS) problem arose as a similar problem, aiming to achieve optimal configuration of quantum circuits. Although classical approaches to solve these problems were thoroughly studied in the literature, a systematic overview that summarizes quantum-based methods is still missing. Our work addresses this gap and provides the first Systemization of Knowledge (SoK) to differentiate, and bridge the gap between the utilization of QC for optimizing ML rather than learning. Specifically, we provide qualitative and empirical analysis of related works, and we classify the properties of QC-based HPO, NAS, and QAS optimization systems. Additionally, we present a taxonomy of studied works, and identify four main types of quantum methods used to address the aforementioned problems. Finally, we set the agenda for this new field by identifying promising directions and open issues for future research.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Machine learning methods in quantum computing theory
    Fastovets, D., V
    Bogdanov, Yu, I
    Bantysh, B., I
    Lukichev, V. F.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MICRO- AND NANO-ELECTRONICS 2018, 2019, 11022
  • [2] Applying machine learning optimization methods to the production of a quantum gas
    Barker, A. J.
    Style, H.
    Luksch, K.
    Sunami, S.
    Garrick, D.
    Hill, F.
    Foot, C. J.
    Bentine, E.
    MACHINE LEARNING-SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 1 (01):
  • [3] Quantum Computing for Optimization With Ising Machine
    Chang, Yen-Jui
    Nien, Chin-Fu
    Huang, Kuei-Po
    Zhang, Yun-Ting
    Cho, Chien-Hung
    Chang, Ching-Ray
    IEEE NANOTECHNOLOGY MAGAZINE, 2024, 18 (03) : 15 - 22
  • [4] SoK: Security and Privacy in Machine Learning
    Papernot, Nicolas
    McDaniel, Patrick
    Sinha, Arunesh
    Wellman, Michael P.
    2018 3RD IEEE EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON SECURITY AND PRIVACY (EUROS&P 2018), 2018, : 399 - 414
  • [5] Probabilistic Computing with p-bits: Optimization, Machine Learning and Quantum Simulation
    Camsari, Kerem Y.
    2024 IEEE INTERNATIONAL MAGNETIC CONFERENCE-SHORT PAPERS, INTERMAG SHORT PAPERS, 2024,
  • [6] Energy-Efficient Optimization for Mobile Edge Computing With Quantum Machine Learning
    Adu Ansere, James
    Tran, Dung T.
    Dobre, Octavia A.
    Shin, Hyundong
    Karagiannidis, George K.
    Duong, Trung Q.
    IEEE WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS LETTERS, 2024, 13 (03) : 661 - 665
  • [7] Quantum computing methods for supervised learning
    Kulkarni, Viraj
    Kulkarni, Milind
    Pant, Aniruddha
    QUANTUM MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2021, 3 (02)
  • [8] Quantum computing methods for supervised learning
    Viraj Kulkarni
    Milind Kulkarni
    Aniruddha Pant
    Quantum Machine Intelligence, 2021, 3
  • [9] Machine learning, quantum computing speed ahead
    Kwan, Rick
    AEROSPACE AMERICA, 2016, 54 (11) : 39 - 39
  • [10] MACHINE LEARNING AND QUANTUM COMPUTING BECOME BFFS
    Anderson, Mark
    IEEE SPECTRUM, 2017, 54 (08) : 14 - 14