Texas groundwater law and the Edwards Aquifer

被引:0
|
作者
Hardberger A. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Law, St. Mary’s University, 1 Camino Santa Maria, San Antonio, 78228, TX
关键词
Surface waters;
D O I
10.1130/2019.1215(15)
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In Texas, groundwater and surface water are managed differently. Surface water is state-owned and governed by the doctrine of prior appropriation. Groundwater law is evolving and based upon a combination of court cases and legislative actions. Like soil, groundwater is property of the surface landowner. The 1904 East case confirmed the absolute ownership of water or the “rule of capture” for beneficial use, limited only in that malicious use or willful waste and, later, subsidence of adjoining properties were not permitted. The Texas Supreme Court later indicated that rule of capture might not be appropriate doctrine, but it declined to replace it with an alternative management doctrine. In the 1990s, there were two major legal changes to the existing legal regime. First, groundwater conservation districts were designated as the preferred method for groundwater management, further emphasizing local control. Second, protection of endangered species in Edwards Aquifer springs necessitated pumping restrictions. More recently, the Day case determined that landowners had a vested property right in water below their land prior to its capture, and the Bragg case determined that, in the facts of that case, the restricting of pumping of groundwater was a taking requiring compensation. Legal constraints will be an important factor in determining the future development of the Edwards Aquifer and associated water resources. © 2019 The Geological Society of America. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 197
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An empirical investigation of institutional change in groundwater management in texas: The Edwards aquifer case
    Boadu, Fred O.
    Mccarl, Bruce M.
    Gillig, Dhazn
    [J]. NATURAL RESOURCES JOURNAL, 2007, 47 (01) : 117 - 163
  • [2] Stygobiont Diversity in the San Marcos Artesian Well and Edwards Aquifer Groundwater Ecosystem, Texas, USA
    Hutchins, Benjamin T.
    Gibson, J. Randy
    Diaz, Peter H.
    Schwartz, Benjamin F.
    [J]. DIVERSITY-BASEL, 2021, 13 (06):
  • [3] Edwards Aquifer evaluation: Kinney County,Texas
    Khorzad, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2003, 39 (05): : 1093 - 1107
  • [4] Aquifer storage and recovery in the Edwards Aquifers, Texas
    Deeds N.E.
    Blumberg F.
    [J]. Memoir of the Geological Society of America, 2019, 215 : 253 - 258
  • [5] STATE OF SATURATION OF GROUNDWATER WITH RESPECT TO DISSOLVED CARBONATES, EDWARDS ARTESIAN AQUIFER, SOUTH-CENTRAL TEXAS
    ABBOTT, PL
    [J]. TEXAS JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, 1977, 29 (3-4): : 159 - 167
  • [6] STOCHASTIC RECHARGE MODEL FOR EDWARDS AQUIFER IN CENTRAL TEXAS
    SCHULMAN, AE
    MCKINNEY, DC
    JOHN, PWM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 1995, 121 (06): : 479 - 489
  • [7] Hydrogeochemical Evaluation of Aquifer Storage and Recovery in Edwards Aquifer, New Braunfels, Texas
    Simbo, Christophe Wakamya
    [J]. GROUNDWATER, 2024, 62 (04) : 560 - 577
  • [8] Source, variability, and transformation of nitrate in a regional karst aquifer: Edwards aquifer, central Texas
    Musgrove, M.
    Opsahl, S. P.
    Mahler, B. J.
    Herrington, C.
    Sample, T. L.
    Banta, J. R.
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 568 : 457 - 469
  • [9] Edwards aquifer evaluation: Kinney County, Texas, by Kaveh Khorzad
    Mace, RE
    Anaya, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2004, 40 (04): : 1099 - 1100
  • [10] C Groundwater Model Provides Better Understanding of Edwards Aquifer
    不详
    [J]. GROUND WATER MONITORING AND REMEDIATION, 2015, 35 (04): : 19 - 19