Preferences for Postacute Care at Home vs Facilities

被引:0
|
作者
Geng, Fangli [1 ,2 ,3 ]
McGarry, Brian E. [4 ]
Rosenthal, Meredith B. [5 ]
Zubizarreta, Jose R. [2 ]
Resch, Stephen C. [3 ,5 ]
Grabowski, David C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Grad Sch Arts & Sci, Boston, MA USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Hlth Care Policy, Boston, MA USA
[3] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Ctr Hlth Decis Sci, Boston, MA USA
[4] Univ Rochester, Dept Med, Rochester, NY USA
[5] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Boston, MA USA
来源
JAMA HEALTH FORUM | 2024年 / 5卷 / 04期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
DISCRETE-CHOICE EXPERIMENTS; MEDICARE ADVANTAGE;
D O I
10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.0678
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Importance Two in 5 US hospital stays result in rehabilitative postacute care, typically through skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) or home health agencies (HHAs). However, a lack of clear guidelines and understanding of patient and caregiver preferences make it challenging to promote high-value patient-centered care. Objective To assess preferences and willingness to pay for facility-based vs home-based postacute care among patients and caregivers, considering demographic variations. Design, Setting, and Participants In September 2022, a nationally representative survey was conducted with participants 45 years or older. Using a discrete choice experiment, participants acting as patients or caregivers chose between facility-based and home-based postacute care that best met their preferences, needs, and family conditions. Survey weights were applied to generate nationally representative estimates. Main Outcomes and Measures Preferences and willingness to pay for various attributes of postacute care settings were assessed, examining variation based on demographic factors, socioeconomic status, job security, and previous care experiences. Results A total of 2077 adults were invited to participate in the survey; 1555 (74.9%) completed the survey. In the weighted sample, 52.9% of participants were women, 6.5% were Asian or Pacific Islander, 1.7% were American Indian or Alaska Native, 11.2% were Black or African American, 78.4% were White; the mean (SD) age was 62.6 (9.6) years; and there was a survey completion rate of 74.9%. Patients and caregivers showed a substantial willingness to pay for home-based and high-quality care. Patients and caregivers were willing to pay an additional $58.08 per day (95% CI, 45.32-70.83) and $45.54 per day (95% CI, 31.09-59.99) for HHA care compared with a shared SNF room, respectively. However, increased demands on caregiver time within an HHA scenario and socioeconomic challenges, such as insecure employment, shifted caregivers' preferences toward facility-based care. There was a strong aversion to below average quality. To avoid below average SNF care, patients and caregivers were willing to pay $75.21 per day (95% CI, 61.68-88.75) and $79.10 per day (95% CI, 63.29-94.91) compared with average-quality care, respectively. Additionally, prior awareness and experience with postacute care was associated with willingness to pay for home-based care. No differences in preferences among patients and caregivers based on race, educational background, urban or rural residence, general health status, or housing type were observed. Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this survey study underscore a prevailing preference for home-based postacute care, aligning with current policy trends. However, attention is warranted for disadvantaged groups who are potentially overlooked during the shift toward home-based care, particularly those facing caregiver constraints and socioeconomic hardships. Ensuring equitable support and improved quality measure tools are crucial for promoting patient-centric postacute care, with emphasis on addressing the needs of marginalized groups.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Postacute care outcomes in home health or skilled nursing facilities in patients with a diagnosis of dementia
    Burke, Robert E.
    Xu, Yao
    Ritter, Ashley Z.
    Werner, Rachel M.
    [J]. HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2022, 57 (03) : 497 - 504
  • [2] Association of Discharge to Home vs Institutional Postacute Care With Outcomes After Lower Extremity Joint Replacement
    Burke, Robert E.
    Canamucio, Anne
    Medvedeva, Elina
    Hume, Eric L.
    Navathe, Amol S.
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2020, 3 (10)
  • [3] Medicare quality measure puts pressure on postacute care facilities
    Traynor, Kate
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2016, 73 (19) : 1485 - +
  • [4] Older persons' preferences for home vs hospital care in the treatment of acute illness
    Fried, TR
    van Doorn, C
    O'Leary, JR
    Tinetti, ME
    Drickamer, MA
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2000, 160 (10) : 1501 - 1506
  • [5] Institutional variations in frequency of discharge of elderly intensive care survivors to postacute care facilities
    Kramer, Andrew A.
    Zimmerman, Jack E.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2010, 38 (12) : 2319 - 2328
  • [6] Preferences for home vs hospital treatment
    Fried, T
    VanDoorn, C
    Tinetti, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1998, 46 (09) : S63 - S63
  • [7] Access to postacute nursing home care before and after the BBA
    Angelelli, J
    Gifford, D
    Intrator, O
    Gozalo, P
    Laliberte, L
    Mor, V
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2002, 21 (05) : 254 - 264
  • [8] HOME CARE VS HOSPITAL-CARE VS NURSING-HOME CARE VS HOSPICE CARE
    KLAGSBRUN, S
    DEBELLIS, R
    FENNELLY, J
    CHERICO, DJ
    OCONNOR, B
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF THE FOUNDATION OF THANATOLOGY, 1975, 5 (04): : 490 - 490
  • [9] Comparison of Functional Status Improvements Among Patients With Stroke Receiving Postacute Care in Inpatient Rehabilitation vs Skilled Nursing Facilities
    Hong, Ickpyo
    Goodwin, James S.
    Reistetter, Timothy A.
    Kuo, Yong-Fang
    Mallinson, Trudy
    Karmarkar, Amol
    Lin, Yu-Li
    Ottenbacher, Kenneth J.
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2019, 2 (12)
  • [10] Postacute care
    Admetlla Falgueras, Margarita
    Fuste Sugranes, Josep
    [J]. MEDICINA CLINICA, 2014, 143 (01): : 29 - 33