Seismic system of long-span composite girder cable-stayed bridge

被引:0
|
作者
Jia Y. [1 ]
Zhao R.-D. [1 ]
Zhao C.-G. [1 ]
Li F.-H. [1 ,2 ]
Xu Z.-Q. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu
[2] National Engineering Laboratory for Technology of Geological Disaster Prevention in Land Transportation, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu
关键词
Bridge engineering; Cable-stayed bridges with composite beams; Ductility seismic system; Nonlinear time history analysis; Seismic mitigation and isolation system;
D O I
10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb20190752
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In order to study the seismic performance of long-span composite girder cable-stayed bridges with different seismic systems, a composite girder cable-stayed bridge with span (177+360+177) m is taken as the research object, and the dynamic analysis model of the whole bridge is established by using finite element software ANSYS. The structural seismic response analysis is carried out by using the non-linear dynamic time history analysis method. Based on the seismic response results of the traditional seismic system, the seismic responses of the bridge with ductile seismic system and isolation system are compared. The results show that under E2 earthquake, the ductile seismic system can form complete hysteretic loops in transition pier and auxiliary pier bottom unit, which can dissipate the seismic energy through plastic hinges. So ductile system can be used for seismic design of transition pier and auxiliary pier. However, the hysteretic curve formed by the plastic hinge at the bottom of the tower is not full hysteretic loop, which indicates that the seismic reduction effect of ductile seismic system at the bottom of the tower is poor and should be carefully adopted. In addition, through internal force analysis, it is found that the ductile system has the best effect on internal force limitation. Especially on the transition pier and auxiliary pier, the effects of the two systems at the bridge tower are similar. So seismic isolation system can be considered in addition to ductility system. Through displacement analysis, it is found that ductile system is the best for transition pier and auxiliary pier in terms of displacement limitation, and seismic isolation system is the best for the bridge tower girder connection. © 2020, Jilin University Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2167 / 2177
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] (2011)
  • [2] (2006)
  • [3] JTG/T B02-01-2008. 公路桥梁抗震设计细则
  • [4] (2001)
  • [5] Wang Hao, Wang Chun-feng, Li Ai-qun, Et al., Seismic performance of new isolated continuous bridge in high intensity region, Journal of Southeast University(Natural Science Edition), 44, 4, pp. 793-798, (2014)
  • [6] Xu Li, Qi Ai, Study of seismic isolation measures for multi-span concrete continuous girder bridge, Bridge Construction, 44, 2, pp. 32-37, (2014)
  • [7] Xia Xiu-shen, Cui Liang-bo, Chen Xing-chong, Et al., Study of application of seismic isolation techniques for long span and super long unit continuous beam bridge, Bridge Construction, 45, 4, pp. 39-45, (2015)
  • [8] Zhang Chang-yong, Wang Zhi-ying, Wang Hong-bo, Study on seismic mitigation and isolation design for a long-span continuous steel truss beam bridge, Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 32, 8, pp. 80-88, (2015)
  • [9] Mao Yu-dong, Li Jian-zhong, Ductility and seismic mitigation and isolation design of long span continuous girder bridges, Bridge Construction, 46, 3, pp. 92-97, (2016)
  • [10] Jia Yi, Zhao Ren-da, Liao Ping, Et al., Research of seismic systems for multi-span and long unit continuous girder bridges in high seismic intensity region, Bridge Construction, 47, 5, pp. 41-46, (2017)