River basin modelling for Shipra River using MIKE BASIN

被引:10
|
作者
Kumar K.S. [1 ]
Galkate R.V. [2 ]
Tiwari H.L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Civil Engineering, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal
[2] National Institute of Hydrology, Regional Centre
[3] Civil Engineering Department, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal
关键词
decision making; MIKE BASIN model; NAM rainfall-runoff model; scenario simulation; Shipra river;
D O I
10.1080/09715010.2018.1534219
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In present study, MIKE 11NAM rainfall runoff(R-R) and MIKE BASIN models were used to develop R–R relationship and to analyze the water availability status of the Shipra river basin under changing hydrological conditions. The model was developed using discharge data observed for 9 years at the Ujjain G/d site. The coefficient of determination(R 2) values for NAM R-R model calibration and validation were 0.685 and 0.642, respectively, indicating good agreement between the simulated and observed runoff. As the Shipra River is subjected to a number of hydrological interventions, the MIKE BASIN model was used to develop various scenarios to study the influence of river diversion, on-stream dam, river interlinking on water availability in different time-scale at desired locations. Scenario analysis of MIKEBASIN results indicated that the Khan diversion, which was executed to avoid entry of contaminated Khan river water into Shipra has reduced the water availability in the Shipra river. However, the simulation results indicated that the water availability in Shipra has been improved due to Narmada-Shipra link, a minimum of 1.7 m3/s flow is available at Ujjain even during the low-flow period. Gambhir reservoir was developed to evaluate how demand deficit can be fulfilled through proper reservoir operation during a drought period. © 2018 Indian Society for Hydraulics.
引用
收藏
页码:188 / 199
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Trend analysis of river flow and groundwater level for Shipra river basin in India
    Galkate, Ravi Venkatrao
    Yadav, Shalini
    Jaiswal, Rahul Kumar
    Yadava, Ram Narayan
    [J]. ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, 2020, 13 (03)
  • [2] Trend analysis of river flow and groundwater level for Shipra river basin in India
    Ravi Venkatrao Galkate
    Shalini Yadav
    Rahul Kumar Jaiswal
    Ram Narayan Yadava
    [J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2020, 13
  • [3] Hydrological assessment of the Teapa River basin, using the MIKE SHE model
    Antonio Torres, Marco
    Nikolskii, Iourii
    Eugenia Martinez-Miranda, Maria
    Martinez, Mario R.
    [J]. TECNOLOGIA Y CIENCIAS DEL AGUA, 2018, 9 (04) : 130 - 146
  • [4] Hydrological modelling of the Mekong River basin
    Kite, G.
    [J]. IAHS-AISH Publication, 2001, (270): : 99 - 102
  • [5] Environmental modelling in river basin management
    Falconer, Roger
    Lin, Binliang
    Harpin, Richard
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT, 2005, 3 (03) : 169 - 184
  • [6] Introduction to flooding and river basin modelling
    Knight, DW
    [J]. River Basin Modelling for Flood Risk Mitigation, 2006, : 1 - 19
  • [7] Hydrological modelling of the Mekong River basin
    Kite, G
    [J]. SOIL-VEGETATION-ATMOSPHERE TRANSFER SCHEMES AND LARGE-SCALE HYDROLOGICAL MODELS, 2001, (270): : 99 - 102
  • [8] Integrated river basin modelling including wetlands and riparian zones in the German Elbe River basin
    Hattermann, Fred F.
    Krysanova, Valentina
    Habeck, Anja
    [J]. Dynamics and Biogeochemistry of River Corridors and Wetlands, 2005, 294 : 93 - 101
  • [9] Analysis of efficiency of pollution reduction measures in rural basin using MIKE Basin model. Case study: Olsava River Basin
    Kaiglova, Jana
    Langhammer, Jakub
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY AND HYDROMECHANICS, 2014, 62 (01) : 43 - 54
  • [10] Flood modeling in the Ba River basin using a coupled hydrodynamic model—MIKE FLOOD
    Tuan L.A.
    Van C.T.
    Binh D.V.
    Kantoush S.A.
    Sumi T.
    Quyen L.V.
    Huong T.T.
    [J]. River, 2024, 3 (02): : 199 - 207