Quantitative evaluation method of energy security under dual carbon target

被引:0
|
作者
Liang J. [1 ,2 ]
Liu D. [2 ,3 ]
Xu S. [2 ]
Ye M. [1 ,2 ]
Liu Z. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] School of Chemistry and Materials Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei
[2] Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian
[3] University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing
关键词
Dual carbon target; Energy; Environment; Renewable energy; Safety; Security evaluation;
D O I
10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2021-2255
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
China has put forward the ambitious goal of "carbon peak by 2030 and carbon neutral by 2060" in order to cope with global climate change. Under the dual carbon target, China's energy structure will transform from the traditional fossil energy to the renewable energy. The transformation of energy structure changes the connotation and evaluation methodology of energy security. The quantitative evaluation methods of energy security are summarized. The advantages and disadvantages of these quantitative methods are analyzed and the scope of their application is marked. The evaluation methods based on energy supply security and national and regional energy security are elaborated. Under the dual carbon target, the parameter of energy security index is different from the previous evaluation index of fossil energy supply security. In parameter selection, more attention is paid to environmental indicators such as emissions of carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide and particulate matter, and related water and food are also included in the quantitative evaluation system of energy security as important evaluation indicators. Under the dual carbon target, especially during the transition period of energy structure transformation, it is of great practical significance to establish a reasonable quantitative evaluation system of energy security. © 2022, Chemical Industry Press Co., Ltd. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1622 / 1633
页数:11
相关论文
共 89 条
  • [1] BIELECKI J., Energy security: Is the wolf at the door?, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 42, 2, pp. 235-250, (2002)
  • [2] GE Fenglong, FAN Ying, Quantifying the risk crude oil imports in China: an improved portfolio approach, Energy Economics, 40, pp. 72-80, (2013)
  • [3] BROWN M A, SOVACOOL B K., Climate change and global energy security: technology and policy options, pp. 910-912, (2011)
  • [4] CHESTER L., Conceptualising energy security and making explicit its polysemic nature, Energy Policy, 38, 2, pp. 887-895, (2010)
  • [5] SOVACOOL B K., The methodological challenges of creating a comprehensive energy security index, Energy Policy, 48, pp. 835-840, (2012)
  • [6] SOVACOOL B K, SAUNDERS H., Competing policy packages and the complexity of energy security, Energy, 67, pp. 641-651, (2014)
  • [7] YERGIN D., Ensuring energy security, Foreign Affairs, 85, 2, (2006)
  • [8] BATAILLE C, NILSSON L J, JOTZO F., Industry in a net-zero emissions world: new mitigation pathways, new supply chains, modelling needs and policy implications, Energy and Climate Change, 2, (2021)
  • [9] ZOU Caineng, PAN Songqi, HAO Qun, On the connotation, challenge and significance of China's "energy independence" strategy, Petroleum Exploration and Development, 47, 2, pp. 449-462, (2020)
  • [10] LI Zhenyu, HUANG Gesheng, Analysis on ways to promote energy production revolution in China, Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 34, 10, pp. 3521-3529, (2015)