Peer assessment to promote self-regulated learning with technology in higher education: systematic review for improving course design

被引:0
|
作者
Ortega-Ruiperez, Beatriz [1 ]
Correa-Gorospe, Jose Miguel [2 ]
机构
[1] Rey Juan Carlos Univ, Innovat & Educ Improvement Res Grp, Madrid, Spain
[2] Univ Basque Country, Elkarrikertuz Res Grp, Donostia San Sebastian, Spain
关键词
peer assessment; self-regulated learning; higher education; Moodle; technology; FEEDBACK; MODEL;
D O I
10.3389/feduc.2024.1376505
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Peer assessment is one of the approaches to develop self-regulation of learning. When evaluating the work of peers, metacognitive strategies of critical reflection are employed. They improve their own learning especially if evaluative feedback and/or suggestions for modification are provided. The aim of this systematic review is to learn how technology can facilitate self-regulation of learning, using peer assessment activities. We focus on higher education. To achieve the objective, we searched WoS and Scopus, obtaining 15 publications that concatenate the four search terms: self-regulated learning, peer assessment, higher education, and technology. These four terms must appear in the title, abstract or keywords. In this way, we ensure that the topic to be reviewed is central to the publication. The results are analyzed using the model for systematic review, which has three phases: description, synthesis, and critique. A proposal has been made to improve the design of courses in virtual classrooms, focusing on Moodle, and to include peer evaluation to improve self-regulated learning. It highlights the possibility of virtual classrooms to configure a rubric to guide the evaluation, together with the request for mandatory comments to justify the evaluation. This helps the student reflect on what is wrong and why, and how to improve. It also highlights the facility to randomly assign a specific number of tasks per reviewer or per task, and to make the whole process completely anonymous. The technology allows short deadlines for submission and review times to be maintained for instant feedback, as it can be configured with a single click. Finally, and related to this, Moodle can reopen the submission phase, to send an improved version based on feedback, and the evaluation phase, to check that the proposed improvements have been made. This helps to a greater extent to apply metacognitive strategies.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Self-Regulated Feedback Processes Enhanced by Technology in Higher Education: a Systematic Review
    Gros Salvat, Begona
    Cano Garcia, Elena
    [J]. RIED-REVISTA IBEROAMERICANA DE EDUCACION A DISTANCIA, 2021, 24 (02): : 107 - 125
  • [2] Self-regulated learning in higher education in Latin-America: A systematic review
    Hernandez Barrios, Aldo
    Camargo Uribe, Angela
    [J]. REVISTA LATINOAMERICANA DE PSICOLOGIA, 2017, 49 (02): : 146 - 160
  • [3] Musical Education and self-regulated learning: a systematic review
    de Oliveira, Iuri Ozires Sobreira
    Silva, Joao Carlos Sedraz
    de Vasconcelos, Gibran Medeiros Chaves
    [J]. REVISTA ELETRONICA PESQUISEDUCA, 2021, 13 (32): : 12100 - 12116
  • [4] Self-Regulated Learning and Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments in Higher Education: A Scoping Review
    Urbina, Santos
    Villatoro, Sofia
    Salinas, Jesus
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (13)
  • [5] Instructional design with ICT for self-regulated learning in Higher Education
    Mauri Majos, Teresa
    Colomina Alvarez, Rosa
    de Gispert, Ines
    [J]. REVISTA DE EDUCACION, 2009, (348): : 263 - 264
  • [6] Assessing self-regulated learning in higher education: a systematic literature review of self-report instruments
    Anne Roth
    Sabine Ogrin
    Bernhard Schmitz
    [J]. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 2016, 28 : 225 - 250
  • [7] Assessing self-regulated learning in higher education: a systematic literature review of self-report instruments
    Roth, Anne
    Ogrin, Sabine
    Schmitz, Bernhard
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT EVALUATION AND ACCOUNTABILITY, 2016, 28 (03) : 225 - 250
  • [8] Using learning analytics to measure self-regulated learning: A systematic review of empirical studies in higher education
    Alhazbi, Saleh
    Al-ali, Afnan
    Tabassum, Aliya
    Al-Ali, Abdulla
    Al-Emadi, Ahmed
    Khattab, Tamer
    Hasan, Mahmood A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2024, 40 (04) : 1658 - 1674
  • [9] Supporting Self-Regulated Learning in Distance Learning Contexts at Higher Education Level: Systematic Literature Review
    Edisherashvili, Natalia
    Saks, Katrin
    Pedaste, Margus
    Leijen, Aeli
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [10] The effectiveness of self-regulated learning strategies in higher education blended learning: A five years systematic review
    Luo, Ren-Zhi
    Zhou, Yue-Liang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2024,