Intercomparison of deep learning models in predicting streamflow patterns: insight from CMIP6

被引:0
|
作者
Anwar, Hamid [1 ]
Khan, Afed Ullah [1 ]
Ullah, Basir [1 ]
Taha, Abubakr Taha Bakheit [2 ,3 ]
Najeh, Taoufik [4 ]
Badshah, Muhammad Usman [5 ]
Ghanim, Abdulnoor A. J. [6 ]
Irfan, Muhammad [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Engn & Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Peshawar 25000, Pakistan
[2] Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz Univ, Coll Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Al Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia
[3] Red Sea Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Port 36481, Sudan
[4] Lulea Univ Technol, Dept Civil Environm & Nat Resources Engn, Operat & Maintenance, Operat Maintenance & Acoust, Lulea, Sweden
[5] Water & Power Div, Peshawar, Pakistan
[6] Najran Univ, Coll Engn, Civil Engn Dept, Najran 61441, Saudi Arabia
[7] Najran Univ Saudi Arabia, Coll Engn, Elect Engn Dept, Najran 61441, Saudi Arabia
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2024年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
Streamflow; Prediction; Deep learning; GCM; CMIP6;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-024-63989-7
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This research was carried out to predict daily streamflow for the Swat River Basin, Pakistan through four deep learning (DL) models: Feed Forward Artificial Neural Networks (FFANN), Seasonal Artificial Neural Networks (SANN), Time Lag Artificial Neural Networks (TLANN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) under two Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) 585 and 245. Taylor Diagram, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosting techniques were used to select the best combination of General Circulation Models (GCMs) for Multi-Model Ensemble (MME) computation. MME was computed via the Random Forest technique for Maximum Temperature (Tmax), Minimum Temperature (Tmin), and precipitation for the aforementioned three techniques. The best MME for Tmax, Tmin, and precipitation was rendered by Compromise Programming. The DL models were trained and tested using observed precipitation and temperature as independent variables and discharge as dependent variables. The results of deep learning models were evaluated using statistical performance indicators such as root mean square error (RMSE), mean square error (MSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and coefficient of determination (R2). The TLANN demonstrated superior performance compared to the other models based on RMSE, MSE, MAE, and R2 during training (65.25 m3/s, 4256.97 m3/s, 46.793 m3/s and 0.7978) and testing (72.06 m3/s, 5192.95 m3/s, 51.363 m3/s and 0.7443) respectively. Subsequently, TLANN was utilized to make predictions based on MME of SSP245 and SSP585 scenarios for future streamflow until the year 2100. These results can be used for planning, management, and policy-making regarding water resources projects in the study area.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Futuristic Streamflow Prediction Based on CMIP6 Scenarios Using Machine Learning Models
    Ullah, Basir
    Fawad, Muhammad
    Khan, Afed Ullah
    Mohamand, Sikander Khan
    Khan, Mehran
    Iqbal, Muhammad Junaid
    Khan, Jehanzeb
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2023, 37 (15) : 6089 - 6106
  • [2] Futuristic Streamflow Prediction Based on CMIP6 Scenarios Using Machine Learning Models
    Basir Ullah
    Muhammad Fawad
    Afed Ullah Khan
    Sikander Khan Mohamand
    Mehran Khan
    Muhammad Junaid Iqbal
    Jehanzeb Khan
    Water Resources Management, 2023, 37 : 6089 - 6106
  • [3] Machine Learning Approaches for Streamflow Modeling in the Godavari Basin with CMIP6 Dataset
    Saravanan, Subbarayan
    Reddy, Nagireddy Masthan
    Pham, Quoc Bao
    Alodah, Abdullah
    Abdo, Hazem Ghassan
    Almohamad, Hussein
    Al Dughairi, Ahmed Abdullah
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (16)
  • [4] The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6
    O'Neill, Brian C.
    Tebaldi, Claudia
    van Vuuren, Detlef P.
    Eyring, Veronika
    Friedlingstein, Pierre
    Hurtt, George
    Knutti, Reto
    Kriegler, Elmar
    Lamarque, Jean-Francois
    Lowe, Jason
    Meehl, Gerald A.
    Moss, Richard
    Riahi, Keywan
    Sanderson, Benjamin M.
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 9 (09) : 3461 - 3482
  • [5] Evaluating Future Streamflow Patterns under SSP245 Scenarios: Insights from CMIP6
    Haleem, Kashif
    Khan, Afed Ullah
    Khan, Jehanzeb
    Ghanim, Abdulnoor A. J.
    Al-Areeq, Ahmed M.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (22)
  • [6] The Deep Arctic Ocean and Fram Strait in CMIP6 Models
    Heuze, Celine
    Zanowski, Hannah
    Karam, Salar
    Muilwijk, Morven
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2023, 36 (08) : 2551 - 2584
  • [7] The Biophysical Impacts of Deforestation on Precipitation: Results from the CMIP6 Model Intercomparison
    Luo, Xing
    Ge, Jun
    Guo, Weidong
    Fan, Lei
    Chen, Chaorong
    Liu, Yu
    Yang, Limei
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2022, 35 (11) : 3293 - 3311
  • [8] Intercomparison of tropical Indian Ocean circulation in ocean reanalysis and evaluation in CMIP6 climate models
    Deepika, P. Bhanu
    Mohan, Soumya
    Srinivas, G.
    DYNAMICS OF ATMOSPHERES AND OCEANS, 2024, 106
  • [9] ENSO Asymmetry in CMIP6 Models
    Zhao, Yaodi
    Sun, De-Zheng
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2022, 35 (17) : 5555 - 5572
  • [10] Warming Patterns Affect El Nino Diversity in CMIP5 and CMIP6 Models
    Freund, Mandy B.
    Brown, Josephine R.
    Henley, Benjamin J.
    Karoly, David J.
    Brown, Jaclyn N.
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2020, 33 (19) : 8237 - 8260