A pilot randomized controlled trial of an online intervention for Hodgkin lymphoma survivors to increase knowledge about late effects and recommended screening

被引:1
|
作者
Rick, Tara J. [1 ,2 ]
Sagaram, Smitha [3 ]
Jewett, Patricia I. [1 ]
Lee, Hee Yun [4 ]
Sadak, Karim T. [2 ,5 ]
Turcotte, Lucie M. [2 ,5 ]
Vogel, Rachel I. [2 ,6 ]
Blaes, Anne [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Med, Div Hematol Oncol, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Masonic Canc Ctr, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[3] Banner MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Phoenix, AZ USA
[4] Univ Alabama, Sch Social Work, Tuscaloosa, AL USA
[5] Univ Minnesota, Dept Pediat, Div Pediat Hematol Oncol, Minneapolis, MN USA
[6] Univ Minnesota, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Womens Hlth, Minneapolis, MN USA
关键词
Breast cancer; Cancer screening; Chest radiation; Hodgkin lymphoma; Secondary cancer; Survivor; Online intervention; 2ND CANCER-RISK; BREAST-CANCER; CHEST RADIATION; WOMEN; DIAGNOSIS; HEALTH; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s11764-024-01587-2
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) survivors who received chest radiotherapy are at risk for breast cancer and cardiovascular disease, but screening adherence is low. We assessed the acceptability/feasibility of a web-based educational intervention and its impact on knowledge of health risks and screening.Methods HL survivors were randomized to either an interactive online educational intervention or handouts only. Surveys were completed at baseline and 3 months post-intervention. We described the acceptability/feasibility of the intervention and compared knowledge between groups.Results Fifty-two HL survivors participated; 27 in the intervention group and 25 in the control group. Eighteen (66%) intervention participants completed the intervention and reported high acceptability (89-100%). At baseline, adherence to breast cancer screening was low across all participants. Post-intervention, those in the intervention group more often than controls correctly identified breast cancer and echocardiogram screening guidelines (35% vs. 28%, P = 0.02 and 82% vs. 52%, P = 0.04) and reported knowing how to address potential complications from cancer treatments (87% vs. 64%, P = 0.03). We detected no increase in screening behavior post-intervention.Conclusion Online education modules for high-risk HL survivors are an acceptable method to improve knowledge of health risks and screening guidelines. Future interventions should focus on improving screening uptake in this population.Implications for Cancer Survivors Web-based learning can be useful in increasing cancer survivor knowledge of their unique risks and screening recommendations but does not necessarily change patient behavior. Involvement in a cancer survivorship program can help assess individual barriers and monitor uptake of screening.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Online Suicide Risk Screening and Intervention With College Students: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
    King, Cheryl A.
    Eisenberg, Daniel
    Zheng, Kai
    Czyz, Ewa
    Kramer, Anne
    Horwitz, Adam
    Chermack, Stephen
    JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 83 (03) : 630 - 636
  • [2] A Pilot Randomized, Controlled Trial of a Wall Climbing Intervention for Gynecologic Cancer Survivors
    Crawford, Jennifer J.
    Vallance, Jeff K.
    Holt, Nicholas L.
    Bell, Gordon J.
    Steed, Helen
    Courneya, Kerry S.
    ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2017, 44 (01) : 77 - 86
  • [3] Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy of an Online Intervention to Increase Physical Activity in Nova Scotian Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Forbes, Cynthia C.
    Blanchard, Chris M.
    Mummery, W. Kerry
    Courneya, Kerry S.
    JMIR CANCER, 2015, 1 (02):
  • [4] A Walking Intervention to Increase Weekly Steps in Dialysis Patients: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
    Sheshadri, Anoop
    Kittiskulnam, Piyawan
    Lazar, Ann A.
    Johansen, Kirsten L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2020, 75 (04) : 488 - 496
  • [5] An Online Mindfulness-Based Group Intervention for Tics: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
    Reese, Hannah E.
    Brown, William Alan
    Summers, Berta
    Hoeppner, Susanne
    Miller, Sarah B.
    Wilhelm, Sabine
    MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2024,
  • [6] The KinFact Intervention - A Randomized Controlled Trial to Increase Family Communication About Cancer History
    Bodurtha, Joann N.
    McClish, Donna
    Gyure, Maria
    Corona, Rosalie
    Krist, Alexander H.
    Rodriguez, Vivian M.
    Maibauer, Alisa M.
    Borzelleca, Joseph, Jr.
    Bowen, Deborah J.
    Quillin, John M.
    JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2014, 23 (10) : 806 - 816
  • [7] Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Testing a Minimal Intervention to Prepare Breast Cancer Survivors for Recovery
    Sterba, Katherine Regan
    Armeson, Kent
    Franco, Regina
    Harper, Jennifer
    Patten, Rebecca
    Kindall, Stacey
    Bearden, James
    Zapka, Jane
    CANCER NURSING, 2015, 38 (02) : E48 - E56
  • [8] A pilot randomized controlled trial of telephone intervention to increase Breast Cancer Screening uptake in socially deprived areas in Scotland (TELBRECS)
    Chambers, Julie A.
    Gracie, Kerry
    Millar, Rosemary
    Cavanagh, Julie
    Archibald, Debbie
    Cook, Alan
    O'Carroll, Ronan E.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2016, 23 (03) : 141 - 149
  • [9] HEALTH OUTCOMES IN HODGKIN'S LYMPHOMA SURVIVORS: INCIDENCE OF LATE COMPLICATIONS WITH A FOCUS ON CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE AND IMPACT OF SCREENING AND INTERVENTION
    Hahn, H. U.
    Keenan, A.
    Price, T.
    Borg, M.
    Thomas, H.
    Tucker, G.
    Bardy, P.
    HAEMATOLOGICA, 2012, 97 : 87 - 87
  • [10] Effects of a Randomized Controlled Trial to Increase Repeat Mammography Screening in Iranian Women
    Taymoori, Parvaneh
    Molina, Yamile
    Roshani, Daem
    CANCER NURSING, 2015, 38 (04) : 289 - 297