Day-to-day associations between mindfulness and perceived stress: insights from random intercept cross-lagged panel modeling

被引:0
|
作者
Borghi, Olaf [1 ]
Voracek, Martin [1 ,2 ]
Tran, Ulrich S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vienna, Fac Psychol, Dept Cognit Emot & Methods Psychol, Vienna, Austria
[2] Univ Vienna, Univ Res Platform Stress Life SOLE Proc & Mech Und, Vienna, Austria
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2024年 / 15卷
关键词
mindfulness; daily hassles; stress; random intercept cross-lagged panel model (RI-CLPM); longitudinal; structural equation modeling (SEM); daily diary study; CONDITIONAL PROCESS MODEL; 5 FACET MINDFULNESS; EMOTION REGULATION; SINGLE-ITEM; DISPOSITIONAL MINDFULNESS; HEALTH; QUESTIONNAIRE; ANXIETY; INTERVENTIONS; MEDITATION;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1272720
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Objective Mindfulness is frequently seen as a protective factor of stress, but self-report measures of mindfulness may overlap with other related constructs, such as mental health, and could thus not only be a predictor, but also an outcome of stress. This study thus aimed to examine the longitudinal bidirectional associations between the use and perceived helpfulness of the four mindfulness facets Observe, Describe, Nonjudge, and Nonreact with daily perceived stress.Methods Participants from a large (N = 1,276) mixed student and community group sample filled out a brief daily diary over the time span of 7 days. Bidirectional cross-lagged effects were investigated using the random-intercept cross-lagged panel model, an extension of the traditional cross-lagged panel model that allows to differentiate between stable between-unit differences and time-varying within-unit dynamics. In addition, we controlled for several baseline and sociodemographic confounders.Results At the within-subject level, the use of Actaware was associated with higher perceived stress on the next day (beta = 0.03, p = 0.029). The use (beta = -0.04, p = 0.025) and perceived helpfulness (beta = -0.05, p = 0.014) of Nonreact were associated with lower perceived stress on the next day. In turn, perceived stress was associated with lower perceived helpfulness of Describe (beta = -0.04, p = 0.037) and Nonreact (beta = -0.03, p = 0.038) on the next day. In addition, there were several residual correlations between mindfulness facets and perceived stress within days. At the between-subject level, there was a positive association between the random intercept of Describe and daily stress (r = 0.15, p = 0.003). In addition, while baseline perceived stress was negatively associated with the random intercepts of the mindfulness facets, two baseline components of mindfulness were not associated with the random intercept of perceived stress.Conclusion On the currently investigated time scale, our results challenge prior results and assumptions regarding mindfulness as a buffering and protective factor against daily stress. With the exception of Nonreact, mindfulness was either positively associated with perceived stress, or in turn perceived stress appeared to interfere with the ability to stay mindful in daily life.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] Three Extensions of the Random Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Model
    Mulder, Jeroen D.
    Hamaker, Ellen L.
    [J]. STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2021, 28 (04) : 638 - 648
  • [3] Stress and Perceived Partnership Quality of Parents to Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Random Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Approach
    Sartor, Teresa
    Lange, Sarah
    Kuhn, Joerg-Tobias
    Troester, Heinrich
    [J]. FAMILY JOURNAL, 2024, 32 (01): : 139 - 148
  • [4] Youth Perceived Social Support and Symptom Distress: A Random-Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Model
    Eline M. Meuleman
    William M. van der Veld
    Odilia M. Laceulle
    Paul T. van der Heijden
    Maaike Verhagen
    Elisa van Ee
    [J]. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2024, 53 : 117 - 129
  • [5] Feelings of not Mattering and Depressive Symptoms From a Temporal Perspective: A Comparison of the Cross-Lagged Panel Model and Random-Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Model
    Etherson, Marianne E.
    Smith, Martin M.
    Hill, Andrew P.
    Flett, Gordon L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT, 2022, 40 (01) : 60 - 76
  • [6] Youth Perceived Social Support and Symptom Distress: A Random-Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Model
    Meuleman, Eline M.
    van der Veld, William M.
    Laceulle, Odilia M.
    van der Heijden, Paul T.
    Verhagen, Maaike
    van Ee, Elisa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF YOUTH AND ADOLESCENCE, 2024, 53 (01) : 117 - 129
  • [7] Burnout as a State: Random-Intercept Cross-Lagged Relationship Between Exhaustion and Disengagement in a 10-Day Study
    Basinska, Beata A.
    Gruszczynska, Ewa
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY RESEARCH AND BEHAVIOR MANAGEMENT, 2020, 13 : 491 - 493
  • [8] Burnout as a State: Random-Intercept Cross-Lagged Relationship Between Exhaustion and Disengagement in a 10-Day Study
    Basinska, Beata A.
    Gruszczynska, Ewa
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY RESEARCH AND BEHAVIOR MANAGEMENT, 2020, 13 : 267 - 278
  • [9] Associations Between Interconnectedness, Compassion, and Participation in Collective Action for People With Mental Illness: A Random-Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Modeling Approach
    Yu, Ben C. L.
    Mak, Winnie W. S.
    Fu, Amanda C. M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPSYCHIATRY, 2024,
  • [10] The Relation Between Complement Understanding and Computational Skills: A Random Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Model
    Yip, Sai-Kit Eason
    Wong, Tin-Yau Terry
    Kwan, Kam-Tai
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 59 (03) : 431 - 441