PHA and EPS production from industrial wastewater by conventional activated sludge, membrane bioreactor and aerobic granular sludge technologies: A comprehensive comparison

被引:2
|
作者
Traina, Francesco [1 ]
Capodici, Marco [1 ]
Torregrossa, Michele [1 ]
Viviani, Gaspare [1 ]
Corsino, Santo Fabio [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Engineering, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Ed. 8, Palermo, 90128, Italy
关键词
Activated sludge process - Batch reactors - Bioconversion - Biological water treatment - Biopolymers - Effluents - Granular materials - Organic carbon - Wastewater treatment - Water quality;
D O I
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.141768
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The present study has focused on the mainstream integration of polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) production with industrial wastewater treatment by exploiting three different technologies all operating in sequencing batch reactors (SBR): conventional activated sludge (AS-SBR), membrane bioreactor (AS-MBR) and aerobic granular sludge (AGS). A full aerobic feast/famine strategy was adopted to obtain enrichment of biomass with PHA-storing bacteria. All the systems were operated at different organic loading (OLR) rate equal to 1-2-3 kgCOD/m3∙d in three respective experimental periods. The AS-MBR showed the better and stable carbon removal performance, whereas the effluent quality of the AS-SBR and AGS deteriorated at high OLR. Biomass enrichment with PHA-storing bacteria was successfully obtained in all the systems. The AS-MBR improved the PHA productivity with increasing OLR (max 35% w/w), whereas the AS-SBR reduced the PHA content (max 20% w/w) above an OLR threshold of 2 kgCOD/m3∙d. In contrast, in the AGS the increase of OLR resulted in a significant decrease in PHA productivity (max 14% w/w) and a concomitant increase of extracellular polymers (EPS) production (max 75% w/w). Results demonstrated that organic carbon was mainly driven towards the intracellular storage pathway in the AS-SBR (max yield 51%) and MBR (max yield 61%), whereas additional stressors in AGS (e.g., hydraulic selection pressure, shear forces) induced bacteria to channel the COD into extracellular storage compounds (max yield 50%) necessary to maintain the granule's structure. The results of the present study indicated that full-aerobic feast/famine strategy was more suitable for flocculent sludge-based technologies, although biofilm-like systems could open new scenarios for other biopolymers recovery (e.g., EPS). Moreover, the AS-MBR resulted the most suitable technology for the integration of PHA production in a mainstream industrial wastewater treatment plant, considering the greater process stability and the potential reclamation of the treated wastewater. © 2024 Elsevier Ltd
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative performance between a novel aerobic granular sludge membrane bioreactor and a conventional activated floc sludge membrane bioreactor
    Wang, Yu-Lan
    Yu, Shui-Li
    [J]. 2009 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, VOLS 1-11, 2009, : 5009 - 5012
  • [2] Removal of organic micropollutants from municipal wastewater by aerobic granular sludge and conventional activated sludge
    Burzio, Cecilia
    Ekholm, Jennifer
    Modin, Oskar
    Falas, Per
    Svahn, Ola
    Persson, Frank
    van Erp, Tim
    Gustavsson, David J. I.
    Wilen, Britt -Marie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2022, 438
  • [3] Occurrence of EPS in activated sludge from a membrane bioreactor treating municipal wastewater
    Evenblij, H
    van der Graaf, JHJM
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 50 (12) : 293 - 300
  • [4] Potential of aerobic granular sludge membrane bioreactor (AGMBR) in wastewater treatment
    Truong, Hong Thi Bich
    Bui, Ha Manh
    [J]. BIOENGINEERED, 2023, 14 (01)
  • [5] Occurrence of Microplastics in Waste Sludge of Wastewater Treatment Plants: Comparison between Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) and Conventional Activated Sludge (CAS) Technologies
    Di Bella, Gaetano
    Corsino, Santo Fabio
    De Marines, Federica
    Lopresti, Francesco
    La Carrubba, Vincenzo
    Torregrossa, Michele
    Viviani, Gaspare
    [J]. MEMBRANES, 2022, 12 (04)
  • [6] The EPS characteristics of sludge in an aerobic granule membrane bioreactor
    Wang Xuan
    Zhang Bin
    Shen Zhiqiang
    Qiu Zhigang
    Chen Zhaoli
    Jin Min
    Li Junwen
    Wang Jingfeng
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 101 (21) : 8046 - 8050
  • [7] Aerobic granular sludge membrane bioreactor (AGMBR): Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) analysis
    Iorhemen, Oliver Terna
    Hamza, Rania Ahmed
    Zaghloul, Mohamed Sherif
    Tay, Joo Hwa
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2019, 156 : 305 - 314
  • [8] A comparison of aerobic granular sludge with conventional and compact biological treatment technologies
    Bengtsson, Simon
    de Blois, Mark
    Wilen, Britt-Marie
    Gustavsson, David
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 40 (21) : 2769 - 2778
  • [9] Removal of pharmaceuticals from synthetic wastewater in an aerobic granular sludge membrane bioreactor and determination of the bioreactor microbial diversity
    Xiao-chun Wang
    Ji-min Shen
    Zhong-lin Chen
    Xia Zhao
    Hao Xu
    [J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2016, 100 : 8213 - 8223
  • [10] PPCPs removal by aerobic granular sludge membrane bioreactor
    Zhao, Xia
    Chen, Zhong-lin
    Wang, Xiao-chun
    Shen, Ji-min
    Xu, Hao
    [J]. APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2014, 98 (23) : 9843 - 9848