Performance Evaluation of Biomedical Waste Incinerator: Environmental, Energy, and Economic Assessment

被引:0
|
作者
Rezaee, Arash [1 ]
Abyar, Hajar [2 ]
Farhadi, Naeemeh [3 ]
Keshavarz, Kazem [4 ]
机构
[1] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Secretariat Green Council Steering Comm, Tehran, Iran
[2] Gorgan Univ Agr Sci & Nat Resources, Fac Fisheries & Environm Sci, Dept Environm Sci, Gorgan, Golestan, Iran
[3] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Secretariat HSE Comm, Tehran, Iran
[4] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Maintenance Dept, Tehran, Iran
来源
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Bottom ash; Environmental impact assessment; Flue gas; Global warming; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; MSWI FLY-ASH; MEDICAL WASTE; BOTTOM ASH; HEAVY-METALS; MANAGEMENT; STABILIZATION; PARAMETERS; RECOVERY;
D O I
10.1007/s40710-024-00725-3
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Improper disposal of biomedical waste (BMW) poses significant threats to public health and ecosystems. Hence, this study was conducted to evaluate the environmental and economic impacts of BMW incineration. The performance of the incinerator, greenhouse gas emissions, and bottom ash (BA) disposal scenarios were investigated based on 1 kg of produced ash. The incinerator's flue gas emissions of SO2 and NOx met the EPA standard limits, unlike CO (83.72 mg/m3), which exceeded limits due to incomplete combustion. Natural gas and electricity consumption were major contributors to global warming, releasing 833.21 kg CO2 eq/ kg ash. Moreover, residual ash contained heavy metals (Zn, Cu, Ni, Cr, and As), posing significant human health toxicity (15.55 to 316.4 kg 1,4-DCB) and freshwater ecotoxicity (8.29 kg 1,4-DCB). The human health impact was 0.0036 DALY, primarily due to SO2 and CH4 emissions. Energy utilization in the incinerator was also dominated by fossil fuels (99.4%). Sensitivity analysis indicated a 17.3-19.91% reduction in impact categories with initial natural gas depletion. Regarding the BA disposal scenarios, BA solidification was less promising than BA landfill due to heavy metal release and CO2 emissions. Economic assessment revealed a 48.72% contribution of maintenance expenses to total operational costs, with the final BMW disposal cost estimated as 6 US$/kg. This study presents a detailed framework for assessing the eco-environmental burdens of BMW incinerators and identifies critical drawbacks. The findings highlight the need for improved incineration practices to achieve a cleaner environment. The biomedical waste incinerator was evaluated considering flue gas and bottom ash.Natural gas consumption mostly contributed to environmental impacts.Maintenance costs dominated the total operational costs of the waste incinerator.The landfill of bottom ash was a promisbiomedicaling disposal approach.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment of environmental and economic performance of Waste-to-Energy facilities in Thai cities
    Menikpura, S. N. M.
    Sang-Arun, Janya
    Bengtsson, Magnus
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2016, 86 : 576 - 584
  • [2] THERMAL ENERGY EVALUATION OF THE INCINERATOR MEDICAL WASTE
    Trebooniti, Kantayut
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMATE, 2021, 20 (81): : 112 - 117
  • [3] BIOMEDICAL WASTE INCINERATOR TESTING PROGRAM
    OZVACIC, V
    WONG, G
    MARSON, G
    CLEMENT, R
    ROKOSH, D
    SUTER, S
    HORSNELL, G
    HIPFNER, JC
    BURNS, S
    CORINTHIOS, H
    YOUNG, M
    BIRMINGHAM, B
    [J]. CHEMOSPHERE, 1990, 20 (10-12) : 1801 - 1808
  • [4] Energy, exergy, economic, and environmental analysis of an organic Rankine cycle integrating with infectious medical waste incinerator
    Chaiyat, Nattaporn
    [J]. THERMAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING PROGRESS, 2021, 22
  • [5] Environmental, Energy, and Techno-Economic Assessment of Waste-to-Energy Incineration
    Zeng, Jincan
    Mustafa, Ade Brian
    Liu, Minwei
    Huang, Guori
    Shang, Nan
    Liu, Xi
    Wei, Kexin
    Wang, Peng
    Dong, Huijuan
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (10)
  • [6] Environmental and economic performance assessment of alternative acid gas removal technologies for waste-to-energy plants
    Dal Pozzo, Alessandro
    Guglielmi, Daniele
    Antonioni, Giacomo
    Tugnoli, Alessandro
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2018, 16 : 202 - 215
  • [7] Spatial targeting evaluation of energy and environmental performance of waste-to-energy processing
    Petar S. Varbanov
    Timothy G. Walmsley
    Yee V. Fan
    Jiří J. Klemeš
    Simon J. Perry
    [J]. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2018, 12 : 731 - 744
  • [8] Spatial targeting evaluation of energy and environmental performance of waste-to-energy processing
    Varbanov, Petar S.
    Walmsley, Timothy G.
    Fan, Yee V.
    Klemes, Jiri J.
    Perry, Simon J.
    [J]. FRONTIERS OF CHEMICAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2018, 12 (04) : 731 - 744
  • [9] Conversion of food waste to renewable energy: A techno-economic and environmental assessment
    Chen, Yunzhi
    Pinegar, Lizzie
    Immonen, Jake
    Powell, Kody M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 385
  • [10] Techno-economic assessment of energy and environmental impact of waste-to-energy electricity generation
    Asim, Muhammad
    Kumar, Rohan
    Kanwal, Ammara
    Shahzad, Amir
    Ahmad, Ashfaq
    Farooq, Muhammad
    [J]. Energy Reports, 2023, 9 : 1087 - 1097