Assessing the Ecological Quality Status in tropical Indian estuaries: testing the applicability of benthic foraminiferal indices

被引:0
|
作者
Punniyamoorthy, Rengasamy [1 ]
Murugesan, Perumal [1 ]
Sanchez, Alberto [2 ]
Francescangeli, Fabio [3 ]
Frontalini, Fabrizio [4 ]
机构
[1] Centre of Advanced Study in Marine Biology, Faculty of Marine Sciences, Annamalai University, Parangipettai, Tamilnadu, 608 502, India
[2] Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Av. IPN SN, Col. Playa Palo de Sta. Rita, B.C.S, La Paz, Mexico
[3] Department of Geosciences, University of Fribourg, Fribourg,1700, Switzerland
[4] Department of Pure and Applied Sciences, University of Urbino, Urbino,61029, Italy
关键词
Pollution; Biotic indices; Diversity; Foram stress index; Vellar and uppanar estuaries; India;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-024-34579-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The ecological quality status (EcoQS) of Vellar and Uppanar estuaries (Southeast coast of India) has been monitored monthly, using a combination of foraminiferal (Foram Stress Index: FSI and exp(H’bc) indices and abiotic (Pollution Load Index: PLI, Dissolved Oxygen: DO, and Total Organic Carbon: TOC) parameters. The Uppanar Estuary shows relatively higher values of PLI and TOC and lower DO values than Vellar Estuary. The highest value of TOC and PLI are recorded during the monsoon season. These variations are well mirrored by the change in exp(H’bc) and FSI. The lowest values of exp(H’bc) are observed with the monsoon season and could be ascribed by an overall reduction of salinity, and to the highest level of TOC and PLI in response to enhanced river discharge. The FSI also exhibits great variability with significant higher values in the Vellar Estuary than in the Uppanar Estuary. The EcoQS evaluated by a combination of pollution- (i.e., PLI, TOC and DO) and foraminiferal-based [i.e., FSI and exp(H’bc)] indices are highly consistent (73.4%). The most frequent disagreement among indices is mostly associated to Uppanar Estuary and, particularly, in the inner stations. This difference might be related to a time-lag response of benthic foraminifera in terms of diversity and assemblages’ compositions as well as of the pollution indicators in response to enhanced riverine input. This study further supports the application of foraminiferal-based indices in EcoQS assessment in transitional environments including tropical Indian estuaries. It also fills the gap of knowledge by providing a seasonal perspective on the variation of EcoQS based on a monthly-scale sampling. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024.
引用
收藏
页码:51604 / 51618
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Testing the efficiency of temperate benthic biotic indices in assessing the ecological status of a tropical ecosystem
    Sivadas, Sanitha K.
    Nagesh, Rahul
    Gupta, G. V. M.
    Gaonkar, Udaykumar
    Mukherjee, Indranil
    Ramteke, Darwin
    Ingole, Baban S.
    [J]. MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2016, 106 (1-2) : 62 - 76
  • [2] Ecological quality status assessment of tropical estuaries with benthic indices using differently derived reference conditions
    Dias, Heidy Q.
    Sukumaran, Soniya
    Mulik, Jyoti
    Janakiram, P.
    [J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2022, 177
  • [3] Ecological quality status assessment of tropical estuaries with benthic indices using differently derived reference conditions
    Dias, Heidy Q.
    Sukumaran, Soniya
    Mulik, Jyoti
    Janakiram, P.
    [J]. MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2022, 177
  • [4] Application of benthic foraminiferal indices to infer the ecological quality status in the Sepetiba Bay (SE Brazil)
    Alves Martins, Maria Virgínia
    Hohenegger, Johann
    Bouchet, Vincent M.P.
    Damasceno, Fabrício Leandro
    Costa Santos, Luiz Guilherme
    Mendonça Filho, João Graciano
    Pereira, Egberto
    Figueira, Rubens
    Senez-Mello, Thaise M.
    Castelo, Wellen Fernanda Louzada
    Sousa, Silvia Helena Mello
    Vilela, Claudia Gutterres
    Antonioli, Luzia
    Damasceno, Raimundo
    Ramos e Silva, Carlos Augusto
    Frontalini, Fabrizio
    [J]. Chemosphere, 2024, 366
  • [5] Assessing the ecological quality status of a temperate urban estuary by means of benthic biotic indices
    Hutton, M.
    Venturini, N.
    Garcia-Rodriguez, F.
    Brugnoli, E.
    Muniz, P.
    [J]. MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2015, 91 (02) : 441 - 453
  • [6] A benthic perspective in assessing the ecological status of estuaries: The case of the Mondego estuary (Portugal)
    Teixeira, H.
    Salas, F.
    Borja, A.
    Neto, J. M.
    Marques, J. C.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2008, 8 (04) : 404 - 416
  • [7] Inferring the ecological quality status based on living benthic foraminiferal indices in transitional areas of the Guanabara bay (SE Brazil)*
    Nunes, Marcia
    Martins, Maria Virginia Alves
    Frontalini, Fabrizio
    Bouchet, Vincent M. P.
    Francescangeli, Fabio
    Hohenegger, Johann
    Figueira, Rubens
    Senez-Mello, Thaise M.
    Castelo, Wellen Fernanda Louzada
    Damasceno, Fabricio Leandro
    Laut, Lazaro
    Duleba, Wania
    Sousa, Silvia Helena de Mello e
    Antonioli, Luzia
    Geraldes, Mauro Cesar
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2023, 320
  • [8] Ecological quality status evaluation of a monsoonal tropical estuary using benthic indices: comparison via a seasonal approach
    Dias, Heidy Q.
    Sukumaran, Soniya
    Srinivas, Tatiparthi
    Mulik, Jyoti
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2018, 25 (23) : 22672 - 22688
  • [9] Ecological quality status evaluation of a monsoonal tropical estuary using benthic indices: comparison via a seasonal approach
    Heidy Q. Dias
    Soniya Sukumaran
    Tatiparthi Srinivas
    Jyoti Mulik
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2018, 25 : 22672 - 22688
  • [10] Comparative efficacy of benthic biotic indices in assessing the Ecological Quality Status (EcoQS) of the stressed Ulhas estuary, India
    Mulik, Jyoti
    Sukumaran, Soniya
    Srinivas, Tatiparthi
    Vijapure, Tejal
    [J]. MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2017, 120 (1-2) : 192 - 202