Challenges of sharing REDD+ benefits in the amazon region

被引:0
|
作者
Guerra R. [1 ]
Moutinho P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Amazon Environmental Research Institute (IPAM), Belem
来源
Forests | 2020年 / 11卷 / 09期
关键词
Benefit-sharing mechanisms; REDD+; Stock-and-flow approach;
D O I
10.3390/F11091012
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The success of jurisdictional reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) initiatives is entirely dependent on how the REDD+ benefits are distributed among the stakeholders seeking to preserve the native vegetation and is considered one of the main challenges of REDD+. Among the existing benefit-sharing options, the adoption of the stock-and-flow approach to share REDD+ benefits has afforded fair jurisdictional systems in the states of Acre and Mato Grosso in the Brazilian Amazon. This innovative perspective is also the dividing line between inequitable and socially balanced jurisdictional REDD+ initiatives. However, these jurisdictions present challenges to fully implementing a robust benefit-sharing mechanism including the stock-and-flow approach and guaranteeing that resources will be accessible to the relevant beneficiaries. To better understand these challenges, we applied the Options Assessment Framework (OAF), a methodology proposed by the World Bank to evaluate the capacity to implement an effective benefit-sharing mechanism for REDD+, in Acre and Mato Grosso. The results indicated that these jurisdictions need to strengthen their conditions to guarantee the multi-faceted functionality of this mechanism and determine what aspects need more attention and where resources should be invested. Additionally, the results indicated that an equitable benefit-sharing mechanism is, by far, the main challenge faced by jurisdictions. Despite being a more evolved state in its REDD+ policies, Acre still needs to improve its institutional capacities, particularly in its local civil society organizations, to help communities access these benefits. The state of Mato Grosso, on the other hand, is still engaging in its REDD+ initiative and needs its institutional capacities to further mature to better organize its monitoring mechanisms and governance. © 2020 by the authors.
引用
下载
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Challenges of Sharing REDD plus Benefits in the Amazon Region
    Guerra, Raissa
    Moutinho, Paulo
    FORESTS, 2020, 11 (09):
  • [2] Benefits and sharing: realizing rights in REDD+
    Birrell, Kathleen
    Godden, Lee
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 9 (01): : 6 - 31
  • [3] Post-conflict transition and REDD+ in Colombia: Challenges to reducing deforestation in the Amazon
    Rodríguez-de-Francisco, Jean Carlo
    del Cairo, Carlos
    Ortiz-Gallego, Daniel
    Velez-Triana, Juan Sebastian
    Vergara-Gutiérrez, Tomás
    Hein, Jonas
    Forest Policy and Economics, 2021, 127
  • [4] Clashing interpretations of REDD+ “results” in the Amazon Fund
    Richard van der Hoff
    Raoni Rajão
    Pieter Leroy
    Climatic Change, 2018, 150 : 433 - 445
  • [5] REDD+ and forest protection on indigenous lands in the Amazon
    Garcia, Beatriz
    Rimmer, Lawrence
    Vieira, Leticia Canal
    Mackey, Brendan
    REVIEW OF EUROPEAN COMPARATIVE & INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW, 2021, 30 (02) : 207 - 219
  • [6] Opportunities and Challenges to Capturing the Multiple Potential Benefits of REDD+ in a Traditional Transnational Savanna-Woodland Region in West Africa
    E. Gunilla A. Olsson
    Syna Ouattara
    AMBIO, 2013, 42 : 309 - 319
  • [7] The inclusion of Amazon mangroves in Brazil’s REDD+ program
    Angelo F. Bernardino
    Ana Carolina A. Mazzuco
    Rodolfo F. Costa
    Fernanda Souza
    Margaret A. Owuor
    Gabriel N. Nobrega
    Christian J. Sanders
    Tiago O. Ferreira
    J. Boone Kauffman
    Nature Communications, 15
  • [8] Opportunities and Challenges for Ecological Restoration within REDD+
    Alexander, Sasha
    Nelson, Cara R.
    Aronson, James
    Lamb, David
    Cliquet, An
    Erwin, Kevin L.
    Finlayson, C. Max
    de Groot, Rudolf S.
    Harris, Jim A.
    Higgs, Eric S.
    Hobbs, Richard J.
    Lewis, Roy R. Robin, III
    Martinez, Dennis
    Murcia, Carolina
    RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2011, 19 (06) : 683 - 689
  • [9] REDD+ AND PROTECTION OF FOREST ECOSYSTEMS: THE CASE OF THE AMAZON FUND IN BRAZIL
    Toledo, Andre de Paiva
    Di Benedetto, Saverio
    Bizawu, Kiwonghi
    VEREDAS DO DIREITO, 2022, 19 (43): : 345 - 379
  • [10] Challenges and lessons learned for REDD+ finance and its governance
    Kanako Morita
    Ken’ichi Matsumoto
    Carbon Balance and Management, 18