Identify the Nitrate Sources in Different Land Use Areas Based on Multiple Isotopes

被引:5
|
作者
Jin Z.-F. [1 ]
Hu J. [1 ]
Wu A.-J. [1 ]
Li G.-Y. [1 ]
Zhang W.-L. [1 ]
Li F.-L. [1 ]
机构
[1] College of Environment, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou
来源
Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science | 2021年 / 42卷 / 04期
关键词
Hydrogen and oxygen isotopes; Land use; Nitrate; Nitrogen and oxygen isotopes; SIAR model;
D O I
10.13227/j.hjkx.202009094
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Different land uses have different impacts on the water quality of the region. Multiple isotopes (δD-H2O, δ18O-H2O, δ15N-NO3-, and δ18O-NO3-) and the SIAR (stable isotope analysis in R) model were applied to identify the nitrate sources and estimate the proportional contributions of multiple nitrate sources in a river in a typical urban area (the Grand Canal, Hangzhou) and a river in a typical forest and agricultural area (Yuying Riveri). The results indicated that there were different degrees of nitrogen pollution in the Grand Canal and Yuying River; NO3--N and NH4+-N are the predominant forms of nitrogen in the Grand Canal, and the primary form of nitrogen in Yuying River was NO3--N. There was an obvious linear relationship between the hydrogen and oxygen isotopes (R2=0.78). The δD-H2O and δ18O-H2O values for the Grand Canal and Yuying River were distributed along the local meteoric waterline, indicating that precipitation served as the primary water source in these rivers. All of the δ18O-NO3- values of the Grand Canal and Yuying River were lower than 15 ‰. It was revealed that nitrification, rather than denitrification, was the primary N cycling process in the two rivers. The δ15N-NO3-/δ18O-NO3- ratios of some of the samples from the Grand Canal ranged from 1.3 to 2.1, accompanied by low concentrations of DO and NO2-, indicating that denitrification existed in some sections of the Grand Canal. The δ15N-NO3- values of the samples from the Grand Canal (average: 6.1‰) were higher than those from the Yuying River (average: 2.3‰). The NO3- source contributions differed significantly between the Grand Canal and Yuying River. The contributions of NO3- sources in the Grand Canal were sewage/manure (37.0%)>soil nitrogen (35.7%)>chemical fertilizer (19.1%)>precipitation (8.2%), and those in the Yuying River were chemical fertilizer (46.1%)>soil nitrogen (22.8%)>precipitation (17.3%)>sewage/manure (13.8%). The contribution of the sewage/manure was substantially increased in the Grand Canal in the urban area with stronger human activities primarily due to the sporadic discharge of domestic sewage and urban runoff. Chemical fertilizer is the main NO3- source in the Yuying River near the forest and agricultural area, suggesting that the nitrogen pollution caused by agricultural non-point sources was extremely serious. The contribution of precipitation decreased in the areas of substantial human activities. The isotopic fractionation produced by denitrification was affected by the contributions of the NO3- sources, which were calculated by SIAR model. Sewage/manure and chemical fertilizer produced significant impacts, followed by soil nitrogen and precipitation. © 2021, Science Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1696 / 1705
页数:9
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Li S L, Xu S, Wang T J, Et al., Effects of agricultural activities coupled with karst structures on riverine biogeochemical cycles and environmental quality in the karst region[J], Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 303, (2020)
  • [2] Haas M B, Guse B, Fohrer N., Assessing the impacts of Best Management Practices on nitrate pollution in an agricultural dominated lowland catchment considering environmental protection versus economic development, Journal of Environmental Management, 196, pp. 347-364, (2017)
  • [3] Zhang X, Zhang Y, Bi Z L, Et al., Distribution and source analysis of nitrate in surface waters of China, Environmental Science, 41, 4, pp. 1594-1606, (2020)
  • [4] Michener R, Lajtha K., Stable isotopes in ecology and environmental science, (2007)
  • [5] Zhang Y, Li F D, Zhang Q Y, Et al., Tracing nitrate pollution sources and transformation in surface-and ground-waters using environmental isotopes, Science of the Total Environment, 490, pp. 213-222, (2014)
  • [6] Gorski J, Dragon K, Kaczmarek P M J., Nitrate pollution in the Warta River (Poland) between 1958 and 2016: trends and causes, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 3, pp. 2038-2046, (2019)
  • [7] Boeykens S P, Piol M N, Legal L S, Et al., Eutrophication decrease: phosphate adsorption processes in presence of nitrates, Journal of Environmental Management, 203, pp. 888-895, (2017)
  • [8] Carey R O, Hochmuth G J, Martinez C J, Et al., Evaluating nutrient impacts in urban watersheds: challenges and research opportunities, Environmental Pollution, 173, pp. 138-149, (2013)
  • [9] Lin S S, Shen S L, Zhou A N, Et al., Assessment and management of lake eutrophication: a case study in Lake Erhai, China, Science of the Total Environment, 732, (2020)
  • [10] Funkey C P, Conley D J, Reuss N S, Et al., Hypoxia sustains cyanobacteria blooms in the Baltic Sea, Environmental Science & Technology, 48, 5, pp. 2598-2602, (2014)