General practitioners' risk literacy and real-world prescribing of potentially hazardous drugs: a cross-sectional study

被引:1
|
作者
Wegwarth, Odette [1 ,2 ]
Hoffmann, Tammy C. [3 ]
Goldacre, Ben [4 ]
Spies, Claudia [5 ,6 ]
Giese, Helge A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Campus Charite Mitte, Heisenberg Chair Med Risk Literacy & Evidence Base, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[2] Max Planck Inst Human Dev, Adpat Rat, Berlin, Germany
[3] Bond Univ, Inst Evidence Based Healthcare, Fac Hlth Sci & Med, Gold Coast, Qld, Australia
[4] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Primary Care Hlth Sci, Oxford, England
[5] Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care Med, Campus Charite Mitte & Campus Virchow Klinikum, Campus Charite Mitte, Berlin, Germany
[6] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
关键词
Evidence-based medicine; Decision making; Healthcare quality improvement; Medical education; Patient safety; RESPIRATORY-INFECTIONS; PRIMARY-CARE; PHYSICIANS; BENEFITS; HARMS; NUMERACY; DOCTORS; NUMBERS; RATES; BOX;
D O I
10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016979
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Overuse of medical care is a pervasive problem. Studies using hypothetical scenarios suggest that physicians' risk literacy influences medical decisions; real-world correlations, however, are lacking. We sought to determine the association between physicians' risk literacy and their real-world prescriptions of potentially hazardous drugs, accounting for conflicts of interest and perceptions of benefit-harm ratios in low-value prescribing scenarios. Setting and sample Cross-sectional study-conducted online between June and October 2023 via field panels of Sermo (Hamburg, Germany)-with a convenience sample of 304 English general practitioners (GPs). Methods GPs' survey responses on their treatment-related risk literacy, conflicts of interest and perceptions of the benefit-harm ratio in low-value prescribing scenarios were matched to their UK National Health Service records of prescribing volumes for antibiotics, opioids, gabapentin and benzodiazepines and analysed for differences. Results 204 GPs (67.1%) worked in practices with >= 6 practising GPs and 226 (76.0%) reported 10-39 years of experience. Compared with GPs demonstrating low risk literacy, GPs with high literacy prescribed fewer opioids (mean (M): 60.60 vs 43.88 prescribed volumes/1000 patients/6 months, p=0.016), less gabapentin (M: 23.84 vs 18.34 prescribed volumes/1000 patients/6 months, p=0.023), and fewer benzodiazepines (M: 17.23 vs 13.58 prescribed volumes/1000 patients/6 months, p=0.037), but comparable volumes of antibiotics (M: 48.84 vs 40.61 prescribed volumes/1000 patients/6 months, p=0.076). High-risk literacy was associated with lower conflicts of interest (phi = 0.12, p=0.031) and higher perception of harms outweighing benefits in low-value prescribing scenarios (p=0.007). Conflicts of interest and benefit-harm perceptions were not independently associated with prescribing behaviour (all ps >0.05). Conclusions and relevance The observed association between GPs with higher risk literacy and the prescription of fewer hazardous drugs suggests the importance of risk literacy in enhancing patient safety and quality of care.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] General practitioners' knowledge of and attitudes towards prescribing psychoactive drugs in dementia care: a cross-sectional questionnaire study
    Dhuny, Sheefah
    Foley, Tony
    Jennings, Aisling
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 190 (02) : 667 - 675
  • [2] General practitioners’ knowledge of and attitudes towards prescribing psychoactive drugs in dementia care: a cross-sectional questionnaire study
    Sheefah Dhuny
    Tony Foley
    Aisling Jennings
    Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -), 2021, 190 : 667 - 675
  • [3] Burden of migraine in Brazil: A cross-sectional real-world study
    Souza, Marcio Nattan Portes
    Cohen, Joshua M. M.
    Piha, Tony
    Ribalov, Rinat
    Lengil, Tamar
    van der Laan, Andressa
    Calderaro, Marcelo
    Lee, Lulu K. K.
    HEADACHE, 2022, 62 (10): : 1302 - 1311
  • [4] General practitioners' predictions of their own patients' health literacy: a cross-sectional study in Belgium
    Storms, Hannelore
    Aertgeerts, Bert
    Vandenabeele, Frank
    Claes, Neree
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (09):
  • [5] Real-World Prescribing Patterns for Hypertensive Children in China from 2018 to 2021: A Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study
    Qian, Qin
    Wang, Yu-Zhen
    Kan, Lian-Di
    Chen, Jie
    Wang, Chen
    Han, Gang
    Li, Liu-Cheng
    Lou, Wei-Jian
    RISK MANAGEMENT AND HEALTHCARE POLICY, 2023, 16 : 287 - 299
  • [6] Prescription of Benzodiazepines and Z-Drugs by German General Practitioners: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Mosshammer, Dirk
    Haumann, Hannah
    Muche, Rainer
    Scheub, David
    Joos, Stefanie
    Laux, Gunter
    GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2018, 80 (10) : 916 - 922
  • [7] Statin prescribing in Nottingham general practices: a cross-sectional study
    Packham, C
    Robinson, J
    Morris, J
    Richards, C
    Marks, P
    Gray, D
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MEDICINE, 1999, 21 (01): : 60 - 64
  • [8] A retrospective, cross-sectional study of real-world values of cardiovascular risk factors using a healthcare database in Japan
    Shima, Daisuke
    Ii, Yoichi
    Yamamoto, Yuji
    Nagayasu, Satoshi
    Ikeda, Yumiko
    Fujimoto, Yoko
    BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, 2014, 14
  • [9] A retrospective, cross-sectional study of real-world values of cardiovascular risk factors using a healthcare database in Japan
    Daisuke Shima
    Yoichi Ii
    Yuji Yamamoto
    Satoshi Nagayasu
    Yumiko Ikeda
    Yoko Fujimoto
    BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 14
  • [10] eHealth literacy in the general population: a cross-sectional study in China
    Chao Sun
    Eline Meijer
    Niels H. Chavannes
    Huohuo Dai
    Xiao Li
    Yue Wang
    Liangqiuhe Wu
    Qing Zhang
    Marise J. Kasteleyn
    BMC Public Health, 25 (1)