Localization Requirements for Autonomous Vehicles

被引:4
|
作者
Reid, Tyler G.R. [1 ]
Houts, Sarah E. [2 ]
Cammarata, Robert [2 ]
Mills, Graham [2 ]
Agarwal, Siddharth [2 ]
Vora, Ankit [2 ]
Pandey, Gaurav [1 ]
机构
[1] Ford Motor Company, United States
[2] Ford Autonomous Vehicles, LLC, United States
关键词
Motion planning - Motor transportation - Roads and streets - Failure analysis - Error analysis - Geometry;
D O I
10.4271/12-02-03-0012
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Autonomous vehicles require precise knowledge of their position and orientation in all weather and traffic conditions for path planning, perception, control, and general safe operation. Here we derive these requirements for autonomous vehicles based on first principles. We begin with the safety integrity level, defining the allowable probability of failure per hour of operation based on desired improvements on road safety today. This draws comparisons with the localization integrity levels required in aviation and rail where similar numbers are derived at 10-8 probability of failure per hour of operation. We then define the geometry of the problem where the aim is to maintain knowledge that the vehicle is within its lane and to determine what road level it is on. Longitudinal, lateral, and vertical localization error bounds (alert limits) and 95% accuracy requirements are derived based on the United States (US) road geometry standards (lane width, curvature, and vertical clearance) and allowable vehicle dimensions. For passenger vehicles operating on freeway roads, the result is a required lateral error bound of 0.57 m (0.20 m, 95%), a longitudinal bound of 1.40 m (0.48 m, 95%), a vertical bound of 1.30 m (0.43 m, 95%), and an attitude bound in each direction of 1.50° (0.51°, 95%). On local streets, the road geometry makes requirements more stringent where lateral and longitudinal error bounds of 0.29 m (0.10 m, 95%) are needed with an orientation requirement of 0.50° (0.17°, 95%). © 2019 SAE International.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Survey on Localization for Autonomous Vehicles
    Kumar, Debasis
    Muhammad, Naveed
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2023, 11 : 115865 - 115883
  • [2] From Neurorobotic Localization to Autonomous Vehicles
    Espada, Yoan
    Cuperlier, Nicolas
    Bresson, Guillaume
    Romain, Olivier
    [J]. UNMANNED SYSTEMS, 2019, 7 (03) : 183 - 194
  • [3] Cooperative Localization for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles
    Bahr, Alexander
    Leonard, John J.
    Fallon, Maurice F.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROBOTICS RESEARCH, 2009, 28 (06): : 714 - 728
  • [4] Cooperative localization for autonomous underwater vehicles
    Bahr, Alexander
    Leonard, John J.
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL ROBOTICS, 2008, 39 : 387 - 395
  • [5] Vehicular Teamwork: Collaborative localization of Autonomous Vehicles
    Hartzer, Jacob
    Saripalli, Srikanth
    [J]. 2021 IEEE INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (ITSC), 2021, : 1077 - 1082
  • [6] Hybrid Baseline Localization for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles
    Wolbrecht, Eric
    Gill, Bryce
    Borth, Ryan
    Canning, John
    Anderson, Michael
    Edwards, Dean
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & ROBOTIC SYSTEMS, 2015, 78 (3-4) : 593 - 611
  • [7] Road DNA Based Localization for Autonomous Vehicles
    Li, Liang
    Yang, Ming
    Wang, Chunxiang
    Wang, Bing
    [J]. 2016 IEEE INTELLIGENT VEHICLES SYMPOSIUM (IV), 2016, : 883 - 888
  • [8] Real Time Cooperative Localization for Autonomous Vehicles
    Bounini, Farid
    Gingras, Denis
    Pollart, Herve
    Gruyer, Dominique
    [J]. 2016 IEEE 19TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITSC), 2016, : 1186 - 1191
  • [9] Hybrid Baseline Localization for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles
    Eric Wolbrecht
    Bryce Gill
    Ryan Borth
    John Canning
    Michael Anderson
    Dean Edwards
    [J]. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 2015, 78 : 593 - 611
  • [10] Short Range Localization of Autonomous Underwater Vehicles
    Pelavas, Nicos
    Lucas, Carmen E.
    Heard, Garry J.
    [J]. OCEANS 2011, 2011,